Jump to content

Elgin balance staff 857, old style vs new style, long hub vs short hub, not sure which I need


Recommended Posts

I purchased an Elgin grade 288 pocket watch with a broken balance.  After looking up the balance staff number, it is part #857, but there is a footnote to look up what's in the special information section.

Here is a link to that section: https://pocketwatchdatabase.com/guide/company/elgin/catalogs/elgin-watch-co-material-catalog-c.1927/294.

It says for part #857, it comes in four varieties, old or new style with a short or long hub.  It also says a few lines down that the old style was used in most watches with serial numbers below 3,000,000.  My serial number is 12,375,905. 

I also saw this thread, and from the illustrations of the ends of the balance staff (and the attached pictures here), I'm guessing I have either the old style long hub or new style long hub.  Given that my serial number is well above 3,000,000 (meaning I have a new style), and my screenshots match the long hub, is it safe to say I have the new style long hub?

Thanks

Greg

IMG_20230403_214503.jpg

Screenshot_20230403-214039.png

Screenshot_20230403-214216.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/3/2023 at 7:42 PM, GregG said:

I also saw this thread,

seeing as how you posted that link I don't have to post the pictures again. then you did notice that there is a pivots size difference but the staffs not that you're going to have a lot of choice today possibly.

usually when I just do is measure the old staff and then figure out what I have.

Oh and another place to get Elgin part numbers is the site

http://www.elginwatchparts.com/

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, JohnR725 said:

usually when I just do is measure the old staff and then figure out what I have.

What do I measure if the staff is broken?  I could try to estimate, but the 0.005" difference between the two styles is well within the margin of error for an estimate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/3/2023 at 7:42 PM, GregG said:

is it safe to say I have the new style long hub?

yes you probably do. But no matter what when you remove the old staff and you get your new staff you want to measure all dimensions to make sure they're the same to avoid unpleasant surprises. In other words a new staff for some unknown reason is physically bigger than the old staff you can break things. Or things won't fit and they'll be loose it's nice to know before you try to put it together. Ideally a micrometer works really well here much better than a veneer caliper. Just be careful with a micrometer and the pivots it's easy to damage them. Then for a micrometer you typically want metric because everything in watch repair almost is done in metric.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks.  The upper and lower hole jewel on this particular watch are both cracked, so I want to get replacements for them.  Someone on eBay makes new hole jewels, so I figure I will purchase them, but I need to pick the hole jewel size.  Is the current recommendation for total side shake (both sides combined) ¹⁄₁₀₀ mm or ²⁄₁₀₀ mm?

The pivot size on the replacement is 12, so I'd need to buy either a 13 or 14 size jewel.

Edited by GregG
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, GregG said:

The upper and lower hole jewel on this particular watch are both cracked, so I want to get replacements for them

then you're lucky according to the parts listing both upper and whole jewels for the balance of the same part number 443

14 minutes ago, GregG said:

so I figure I will purchase them, but I need to know the hole jewel size. 

as the availability of staffs in all different pivot sizes is not what it once was I would find a suitable staff contact the seller of the jewels and ask what size they recommend. Typically the higher the jewel count the smaller the pivot.

 

 

Elgin balance hole jewel 443.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If it's a push on back then it could have a notch in it for the stem which would mean the wording position would stay the same across all watches no matter how many times the back was removed. I've never seen a watch of this era, even a front loader, that doesn't have a removable back.  
    • Rule of thumb I have is that if the dial is larger than the case back (or the thing pretending to be a case back) then it is probably a front loader. Appreciate it's sometimes not easy to tell, but lots of times it's obvious and you kick yourself for not realising it earlier.
    • Geotex, wow on the poor-man’s display back.  Didn’t see that coming.  Thanks for letting me off the hook for not realizing it.  I greatly appreciate your time and advice.  I am trying follow all of the advice people take the time to provide but being a relative novice I am not always sure of exactly how to execute it.  I don’t want to go too far in the wrong direction. I have already found out how that ends.  Your evidence regarding the wording on the case backs is compelling.  It’s placed exactly the same as mine.  What’s the odds that three watches could have case backs removed and replaced repeatedly and all end up in the exact same position.  They are identical except for the fact that some idiot super glued a big nut in the middle of mine.   Now, considering the last comment by Eccentric59, does it make sense to pull the Crystal to check to see if it has a Seiko movement with a release lever before I commit to using pliers on the crown?  Nothing to lose with that approach I guess.   Thanks to everyone again for your time!
    • Might I suggest one of the iterations of Linux for older hardware? Mint cinnamon is very Windows-like with a much lower pain point for legacy devices.
    • Hi All I have a set of the Chinese mainspring winders, and are considering buying a few specific Bergeon Winders. Could someone who owns some Bergeon winders please provide a measurement for me, I am checking  whether I can use my Chinese handle (tight arse) to hold the Bergeon winders. Chinese measurements are: Handle ID =  12.05 mm Winder OD = 12.00 mm Pin OD = 1.50 mm (that locates in the handle slot) I have seen a few Youtube videos were they don't use a handle just hold the winders, anyone practise this out there ? Thanks CJ
×
×
  • Create New...