Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Hello!

Bruno bere from Brazil.

First time I get a Squale model 1545. Very solid and very well finishing.

But not used yet with the crown setting. When I pull it to date position (1) or further to the time setting position (2) it doesn’t go back following those steps. I mean I have to press the crown againt the case until the yoke seems completely disengaged from the stem. If I slightly push the crown it doesn’t back to position 1 (date)and on.

Well it’s something I can live with but looks differently compared to others with screw down crowns.

Anyone faced something like this?

 

osvaldo Bruno

Edited by brunomartins
Posted

Is it a new Squale 1545 with the Selita SW-200 or the previous version with the ETA 2824-2?

The 2824 can have issues with the yoke disengaging from the winding stem.

Mark made a video about it:

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
On 3/27/2023 at 2:47 PM, SpringMangler said:

Is it a new Squale 1545 with the Selita SW-200 or the previous version with the ETA 2824-2?

The 2824 can have issues with the yoke disengaging from the winding stem.

Mark made a video about it:

 

 

The stem broke after a couple of push and pulls of crown. Makes me feel Squale not reliable. Returned the watch.

Edited by brunomartins
Posted
On 3/27/2023 at 2:47 PM, SpringMangler said:

Is it a new Squale 1545 with the Selita SW-200 or the previous version with the ETA 2824-2?

The 2824 can have issues with the yoke disengaging from the winding stem.

Mark made a video about it:

 

 

I do believe the problem was the same. Do you know if after repositioning the yoke the problem repeats?



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Depends what sizes of watches you mostly service . If you were to say pocket watches then you might benefit by wholly replacing the 9010 for 9020. As a rough guide hp500 is twice the viscosity of 9020 which is twice the viscosity of 9010 at 20°c.  So hp500 would give you a more mid-range oil between thin 9010 and HP1300, but as it happens hp750 is more mid- range than hp500, but is that more or less useful when oiling a train of wheels. After the barrel arbor the jump down in pivot size is around half, then after the centre wheel maybe more than half until the escapement. And pivot size isn't especially a deciding factor, as the torque and speed of a pivot would be more relevant when thinking about which oil to choose. So 750 might only be useful on a centre wheel and nothing else, and 500 might be better than 1300 for oiling the centre wheel but still comprises the rest of the train, where 9020 would be ok for the train but too thin for the centre wheel, leaving only 1300 for the oiling of it. You see the problem we're having here. What can be ok for one thing is less ok for another in a different way, damping down power compared to oil spread.  Maybe mixing a drop from two opposite range viscosity synthetic oils will give you some approximate thickness of an in-between . You want a short answer now ?  I tnink I'd go with the 9020. Now be prepared for a whole host of different answers. Then to go with this, watch manufacturers change their minds about which oils to use more times than actresses change their knickers. 
    • So, working on watches and your karma at the same time: win-win situation! 
    • @SteveF ,  Go on to Dr ranfft website,  Enter keywords Omega 26.5T3  ranfft .  There Dr ranfft  has listed all related calibers to this family, all which beat the same frequency,  any balance complete of this family fit your watch. This would only expenad your choice of balance complete.  Recolleting your hairspring is easy, but matching it with a balance of the family is challanging. Regs        
    • Yes, it looks much better, but at this point the main thing is to make the spring in one plain. so picture from side will show this better. Now it is seen that #1 bending is needed, which is normal.
×
×
  • Create New...