Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi. My son has a Rotary automatic. For a while, it has only worked if held face down. When it’s turned over, it slowly grinds to a halt. 
Upon opening the case, I also found a small piece of the movement rattling around. It’s tiny and I can’t find where it belongs. The picture shows this. Can anyone please help??

961A9497-348F-46AD-85A1-67F1725EF62F.jpeg

Posted

That looks to me like a broken setting lever spring, which is the thing that makes the "click" when you pull out the stem to set the time.

I'm going to guess that was impinging on the works inside the watch when it's face up, and fell out of the way when face down.

I don't know anything about Rotary watches, but it definitely needs to be taken apart and serviced, and the spring replaced.

  • Like 1
Posted

I would agree with Manskirtbrew setting lever spring,  you need to get the movement out of the case and the dial and hands off. If it has the day date complications on they will have to be r3moved to expose the setting lever.  At that point post a new picture of the watch movement and have a look for the calibre number and makers mark under the dial , on the rotor or the bridge. You will need this for ordering parts. My thoughts are being a skeleton watch it maybe Chinese movement and parts are hard to find. Might be easier buying a replacement movement , once we know it’s details.   Cheers

Posted (edited)

Actually looks like a part of the pawl lever to me. The newer rotary skeletons use seiko clones. I have one with a hz2189g in it, which looks like a clone of a 7002.

Can we get a photo of the movement? 

Depending on the movement they are pretty easy to source a whole new one. 

Looks like this part. 

Screenshot_20230116_131803.jpg

Edited by lexacat
  • Like 1
Posted

Hi Lexacat at may well be right , I expanded the picture and it does look suspiciously like on leg of the magic finger(pawl), If it requires the rotor and is assembly removing to confirm. You should be able to get the part no problem.  Cheers

Posted
On 1/16/2023 at 12:11 AM, lexacat said:

Actually looks like a part of the pawl lever to me

Nice catch! I've never seen a pawl lever. Looks like it's part of the automatic works to allow a gear to move in one direction?

Posted
1 hour ago, ManSkirtBrew said:

Nice catch! I've never seen a pawl lever. Looks like it's part of the automatic works to allow a gear to move in one direction?

Correct! It grabs either side of the second reduction wheel. Super clever design. 

Unfortunately, if its a 7xxx clone, it will require removal of the barrel bridge to replace it which is a bit of a pain. It is held in from underneath by a circlip. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello all, just disassembling to service, but I can’t figure out the working of the calendar work…it’s not operational the jumper and spring are ok, but the operation of the driving wheel has me at a loss. I can’t see a cam to drive anything. Is something damaged or missing? Help please!
    • Believe the relume (not a fan) was done a long time after the damage. 
    • I can only think of some chemical reaction to reluming
    • I have a little milling attachment for my WW lathe, but very rarely use it and not for wheel and pinion cutting. For that I use a small Sixis 101 milling machine. I normally do direct dividing, but sometimes have to do an odd count and use the universal index which also fits on the Sixis.   Back in the day when I didn't have a mill, I would cut gearing on my Schaublin 102. It has a universal dividing attachment which fits the back of the spindle. Both it and the one for the Sixis are 60:1 ratio, and with the set of 4  index plates I can do almost any division. When I've had to do a strange high count prime number, I print a disc with the needed division and just place the plunger on the dot. Any position error is reduced by a factor of 60 so still plenty accurate.   The machines are a mess in the pics as I'm in the process of making a batch of barrels for a wristwatch 🙃.   This is the Sixis. The head can also be placed vertically, as can the dividing spindle.   Dividing plates. The smaller ones fit another dividing spindle.   Universal divider for the Sixis. I put it together with parts from an odd Sixis spindle that takes w20 collets, like the Schaublin 102, and a dividing attachment from a Schaublin mill.     The dividing attachment for the 102. The gear fits in place of the handwheel at the back of the headstock.   And the little milling attachment for the WW lathe. I just set it on the slide rest to illustrate the size, you can see from the dust on it it really doesn't get used much. I think only when I change bearing in the head, to kiss the collet head seat (grinding wheel still in the milling attachment).
    • I read a lot about the quality (or lack thereof) of Seiko's 4R, 6R, 8L  movements...or more specifically the lack of regulation from the factory. Especially when compared to similar priced manufactures using SW200's or ETA's. I thought I'd ask those more in the know, do the 4R's and 6R's deserve their bad reputation, is it fairly easy for someone with minimal skills (or better yet a trained watch mechanic) to dial in these movements to a more acceptable performance.    For background I spent more on a 1861 Speedy years ago, expecting that the advertised 0-15s/d  would probably perform more like 5-7s/d. In reality it's been closed to 2-4s/d. 
×
×
  • Create New...