Jump to content

What is a good supplier for jewels? My options are either poor choice and good prices, or good choice and poor prices


Recommended Posts

I have a watch that I really want to restore, but so many of the jewels are cracked, chipped, or completely shattered, so I'm thinking an entire replacement of jewels might be necessary.

My normal go-to is Cousins.  They've got the best price and sell in packs of three, but for some reason, more than half of all the available sizes are listed as discontinued.  And all of the cap jewels are listed as discontinued.

My next go-to is Otto Frei.  They've got a much better selection, but their unit price per jewel is not as good.

Anyone know a good supplier of jewels at a good price?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What movement is this? It might be cheaper to buy a few scrap movements and obtain the jewels from these movements. New jewels are very expensive, and may not correspond to the exact pivot size and OD of the original, which means you will have to ream the holes in the mainplate and  bridges.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unlikely that I'll find a donor movement.  It's by a brand called J. Calame Robert.  I've seen other watches from them, but never seen the same movement prior, and never seen the same movement since.  I've taken detailed measurements of the diameters of the existing jewels and the gear arbors.  Thankfully I won't require too many different sizes of jewels so cost should be minimized.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have you measured the pivot sizes too?  You have to be very careful when replacing jewels. The pivot hole in the jewel has to be slightly larger than the pivot itself (for side shake). The OD of the jewel has to be matched to the hole in the plate or bridge, being very slightly larger than the hole for a good tight fit. Even then, sometimes the hole in the plate or bridge is not tight enough, and you have to ream up to the next size and get a new larger jewel.
 

Is there no marking on the movement itself?

 

Anyway, other than Cousins, and Otto, I am not aware of any other material houses that supply jewels… you can always try getting jewel assortments, but those require you to sort through hundreds of jewels without any guarantee that there’s one of what you want in there.

Edited by ifibrin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am able to indirectly measure the actual pivot size.  I use a small smoothing broach, slide it in till it stops, then measure the point where it stops.  Not tremendously accurate, but it works.  However, given that some of the jewels are cracked or worn, I think it's easier to just measure the arbor, and add 0.02mm

As for markings on the movement, nothing really, other than a few which seem meaningless.

The "plus" from the Swiss flag with the number 51482 underneath.  The number 1669.  The word "Tandem," and an arrow.

Edited by GregG
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is not rare at all, the dial code and case code don't usually match.
    • Good question!! Anyone know of a substitute movement??!! 🤔🙏
    • Interesting issue that I just noticed: this Seiko 5actus Watch from 1977 has a calibre listing on the dial of 7019-8030R but on the case back it says 7019-8010!! Like a mis-printed coin, is this watch therefore worth a lot of money for its rarity?? 🤪😲🤔🤪
    • I wish that was the case. The Aegler movements used in the early days by Wilsdorf & Davis (for brands like Rolex and Rolco) came in several sizes and without designated calibre numbers that survive.  They become a bit easier to identify during the 1920s. Below is an Aegler-Rebberg, 25.74mm in diameter. It’s from a woman’s Rolex wristwatch. Stamped Rebberg and 500 on the dial plate (but it isn’t a Rebberg 500, it’s the wrong size).  I’d be interested if anyone can identify the movement.  It is based off the Aegler Nr.1, circa 1903, but they based many many calibres of different sizes on it. The closest I have to a positive ID is the  ‘Rolex Nr.50’ circa 1917, but no dial side images or movement sizes are available in the references. There are identical looking movements in many sizes.  The 25.74mm of this movement is a particularly strange size for the era, it equates to 11.41 lignes.      Best Regards, Mark
    • It looks like this movement comes with a number of different shock settings. Emmywatch shows that it comes in versions with no shock settings, 'Incabloc', 'shock resist', and 'Supershock'. Perhaps the different settings position the impulse jewel/roller table in a non-ideal position relative to the pallet fork/guard pin. Are you able to check under high magnification if the pallet fork and roller table are able to operate without any interference? Just for fun I took a look and I have one FHF 70 in my collection, a West End Secundus with a non-shock protected FHF70. I had a note with the watch that said, "Movement is stamped 'FHF 70', but the FHF70 looks to have sub-seconds instead of center seconds movement (??)" but that a google search turned up both types for this movement. EDIT: I just took a look in my parts drawer and I have a few of these movements, both in center seconds and sweep seconds, but they all are non-shock protected.  
×
×
  • Create New...