Jump to content

How should I use lighter fluid to clean my watch parts?


Recommended Posts

22 minutes ago, Waggy said:

I currently use hexane as the final cleaning fluid for my balance... Once I use up my hexane, I will consider switching to PERC.

@Waggy I had mistakenly used hexane on a pallet fork thinking it was safe for the shellac, and it is not.  Just a heads up.  I find the hexane works better on the components that have shellac on them that I do not want damaged.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hexane is chemically similar to heptane which is the primary ingredient of Essence of Renata, as taken from its MSDS sheet. So I'm surprised that something so similar to this which is designed to clean hairsprings reacts with shellac, but thanks for the heads up, something for me to be cautious of from now on!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, I thought it was safe on shellac, but after my stones started to all come loose, I emailed the manufacturer and asked and they said not to use it with shellac as it will dissolve it they said.  Here is what they sent me...

Quote

Dear John-
Whoever advised you absolutely not to use One Dip on shellac is absolutely correct. The same way alcohol will soften shellac, trichlorethylene will also effect shellac.
Thank you for reaching out.
Troop-Balas Labs
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Waggy said:

I would agree with you but unfortunately there are those of us who live somewhere where you can't buy or import those fluids. FYI many of the cleaning fluids have a naphtha base, for example L&R rinse 3 is 30% straight naphtha and 70% white spirit (Stoddard solution). Where Stoddard solution is just naphtha with some of the more aromatic elements removed. Hence, if you use this commercial product you are in fact rinsing your watch in lighter fluid (naphtha). 

As a side note, L&R 111 is about 80% naptha/Stoddard solution which means you are also cleaning in something which is 4/5 lighter fuel.

At the end of the day you need a clean watch, how you got it clean is not important. Clean is clean.

👍the only issue i found was some residue left from the lighter fluid, even fresh fluid ( brands can differ in composition ) that ipa didn't always remove. But i found the same issue occurred with elma wf pro. and some fluid beading on the parts, plates mostly. We had some discussion over this and discovered that not enough drying could be the cause.  Extra drying seemed to solve the issue for me with the elma pro. My cleaning proceedure is now 3 minutes in a jar of elma pro ammoniated, ultrasonicated ( new word 😄) . Remove baskets shake off excess and blow dry with a hairdryer for a minute or so . Repeat proceedure with 2 rinses of ipa. Finish off with 20 minutes in a food dehydrator.  The parts come out all sparkly, residue free and completely dry.

4 hours ago, kd8tzc said:

@Waggy I had mistakenly used hexane on a pallet fork thinking it was safe for the shellac, and it is not.  Just a heads up.  I find the hexane works better on the components that have shellac on them that I do not want damaged.

Eyup kd, a little confused as to your statement, just to clarify for waggy and myself that thought hexane was ok. Here you are saying you think hexane is ok or not ok ?

Edited by Neverenoughwatches
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, kd8tzc said:

Sorry, looks like you may have a typo as I have no idea what that means.

Yes, mistype on my side though... hexane IS okay for things with shellac, One Dip is not.

Thanks for the clarification kd.  Lol no not a typo. Eyup= hiya.  Strange that you find one dip is not good for shellac, i was under the impression that its an industry standard for parts with it

Edited by Neverenoughwatches
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

Thanks for the clarification kd.  Lol no not a typo. Eyup= hiya.  Strange that you find one dip is not good for shellac, i was under the impression that its an industry standard for parts with it

I'm the furthest thing from an expert, but I've been using One-Dip to clean shellac parts for some time now without incident.  On Boley, as well as other sources, it says that immersion in One-Dip will not dissolve shellac.  One time I even forgot that I had left a pallet fork in a jar of One-Dip, and I went to dinner that evening with some friends.  I came back several hours later, and that night I had remembered that the part was still in the jar.  The shellac survived without any issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure what to tell you.  When I had placed my pallet fork in One Dip, it made the shellac nice and soft and the stones fell out.  I was under the same impression that One Dip was safe for things with Shellac and so I wrote to Troop-Balas Labs, and you saw their response above basically saying do not use with shellac as it (one Dip) will affect it.  They manufacturer the stuff, so I would think they know what they are talking about.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, kd8tzc said:

Not sure what to tell you.  When I had placed my pallet fork in One Dip, it made the shellac nice and soft and the stones fell out.  I was under the same impression that One Dip was safe for things with Shellac and so I wrote to Troop-Balas Labs, and you saw their response above basically saying do not use with shellac as it (one Dip) will affect it.  They manufacturer the stuff, so I would think they know what they are talking about.

You would think that yes. I'm still confused as i thought the small mesh filtered bottle was specifically designed for pallet forks and balances.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

the small mesh filtered bottle was specifically designed for pallet forks and balances.

What bottle are you talking about?  Mine came in a can.  Are you maybe talking about Epilam which is something complete different?  That's the only thing I know that has the special (and very expensive) bottle.

image.png.388d0f6c4ccb8724b904eee41c3ca2f6.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we may be comparing apples and oranges when looking at One-Dip and B-Dip, and it may explain the confusion over shellac compatability.

One-Dip is 99% Trichloroethylene

image.png.9f7e5404556c210c6dce800793908c18.png

But B-Dip is not made of Trichloroethylene, it appears to be naphtha! See the route below I took to find this out --->

Here is the B-Dip MSDS sheet from CousinsUK for the version of B-Dip they currently sell:

image.png.4b660c2146df3af0f941c87558a7488c.png

And looking up EC 931-254-9 you get a reference to the CAS number 64742-49-0:

image.thumb.png.6a234c27e0b30caa834aec4c45d7c01d.png

When you look up CAS 64742-49-0 you get Naphtha:

image.png.cc5cd6d290a5b644ab976213b51141df.png

Hence completely different compounds which probably explain the different recommendations and/or reactions with shellac.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Waggy said:

I think we may be comparing apples and oranges when looking at One-Dip and B-Dip, and it may explain the confusion over shellac compatability.

One-Dip is 99% Trichloroethylene

image.png.9f7e5404556c210c6dce800793908c18.png

But B-Dip is not made of Trichloroethylene, it appears to be naphtha! See the route below I took to find this out --->

Here is the B-Dip MSDS sheet from CousinsUK for the version of B-Dip they currently sell:

image.png.4b660c2146df3af0f941c87558a7488c.png

And looking up EC 931-254-9 you get a reference to the CAS number 64742-49-0:

image.thumb.png.6a234c27e0b30caa834aec4c45d7c01d.png

When you look up CAS 64742-49-0 you get Naphtha:

image.png.cc5cd6d290a5b644ab976213b51141df.png

Hence completely different compounds which probably explain the different recommendations and/or reactions with shellac.

Ah ok thanks waggy, i only noticed the listing that said b dip hairspring,  one dip solution. Looking at the label l thought it was the same product. So cool Bergeon are charging 60 bucks for 50ml of benzene.  I have yet to try my chloroethylene on hairsprings.  I found this statement on it, i wonder how accurate it is ? 

Screenshot_20230816-090344_Google.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From my days many moons ago doing chemistry all the chloro carbons are carcinogenic to a greater or lesser degree.

So, distilling it all down, it would appear that one-dip (Trichloroethylene) is not ok with shellac based on the communication with the people who make the stuff as reported in earlier posts in this thread. But B-dip (naphtha) is ok.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Waggy said:

From my days many moons ago doing chemistry all the chloro carbons are carcinogenic to a greater or lesser degree.

So, distilling it all down, it would appear that one-dip (Trichloroethylene) is not ok with shellac based on the communication with the people who make the stuff as reported in earlier posts in this thread. But B-dip (naphtha) is ok.

When i get home from my break, i will try the perc i have. Labeled as tetrachloroethylene. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

When i get home from my break, i will try the perc i have. Labeled as tetrachloroethylene. 

I think that is chemically similar to trichloroethylene which may be bad for shellac. May be worth a science experiment to see if a flake of shellac will dissolve or partially dissolve in perc at room temperature?

For completeness it may also be worth running the same test in naphtha?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Waggy I tried something similar to what you had suggested with a flake of shellac in One Dip while back.  I left the flake of shellac in the One Dip for about an hour.  It didn't dissolve the flake of shellac, but it did make it soft and malleable (and still was so an hour after I removed it from the One Dip).  I don't know if heat applied to the shellac flake would have boiled off the One Dip and allowed it to harden again, but it certainly altered it's state.  I should have left the flake overnight out of the One Dip to see if it would have hardened on it's own, but I didn't think to try that at the time.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/16/2023 at 9:57 AM, Waggy said:

I think that is chemically similar to trichloroethylene which may be bad for shellac. May be worth a science experiment to see if a flake of shellac will dissolve or partially dissolve in perc at room temperature?

For completeness it may also be worth running the same test in naphtha?

I know that the lighter fluid i use has never affected the shellac on any pallet stones even after an overnight soak. The percentage of naptha isn't stated on the label. Pharmaceutical grade naptha ( 99.99 %) is readily obtainable in the Uk through ebay at 22 quid per litre. Who knows we might one day have a concisive list of what to use for cleaning all watch parts which everone agrees upon 😆.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Waggy said:

I think our grandchildren will still be arguing about it 🙂

 

Eyup peeps , i have an update on my experiment with perc. Tetrachloroethylene.  Two pallet forks from movements approx 50 years old were soaked for one hour. Removed and then poked at the shellac with a sharp needle. The shellac wasn't especially soft but the needle point could be pressed in, and if pushed the shellac would shell off. I didn't test before hand how hard the schellac was so i tried on another six dry pallet forks from the same test bunch. The result was the just the same, the needle point could be dug in and shellac could be shelled off with the same general force as the soaked pallet forks. My conclusion from this is that Tetrachloroethylene ( supposedly a similar chemical to one dip ) doesnt have much if any effect on shellac. But secondly shellac is not really the superglue adhesive that some folk may think it is, but more than adequate to keep stones in place during the forces they undergo go perform their function. 

20230818_180335.jpg

20230818_191455.jpg

Edited by Neverenoughwatches
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Fast responses - thank you. Yes, I mentioned the 18000bph to illustrate that it's not a matter of touching coils, over banking, shortened hairspring etc. I even took off the platform and temporarily fitted a another NOS one also with 8 leaves and beating 18000 but the colossal gain is the same. I'm resigned to buying and fitting a new Gorge platform plus a 7 leaf pinion escape wheel but only if I think it will work; otherwise it's a waste of £200 and a couple of hours work. Hence the underlying question is: all other things being equal, what would the timekeeping effect be? Is it a simple 7/8ths as fast? Logic tells me it is but can it be that linear?
    • Sorry to jump in here guys, but I've read through this whole thread and it seems there are a lot of people who think joining Facebook means everyone will have access to their lives. You could make a Facebook account with a fake name. You could even use your real name if you wanted to and set it to completely private so people can't even find you in a search and you don't have to add anyone as a 'friend', so you won't see anyone's posts. Literally use it to join a group full of members of this site. Admins could even set the group to private and require a password of some sort to gain acceptance into the group, so you can be sure that it's only members of this site that get in. @tomh207 is right, the form with email addresses and names is a bad idea. That will be abused by scrapers. Facebook is only as personal as you let it be. You can be completely anonymous on there if you wish. Don't think of it as Facebook. Just think of it as a watch repair group as that's all you'd use the account for. It doesn't even have to be set up with your current email address. Make a random one on Gmail or any other free provider just for the Facebook account. Tagged you by accident and now it won't let me remove it 😂 @Neverenoughwatches
    • Hello and welcome from Leeds, England. Plenty of clock people on here to help you out. 
    • Hi I'm a new member.  I recently pulled a Wakmann 8 hour clock out of one of my small airplanes.  My hope is to get it working again.
    • I have a timex urban command (digital watch with indiglo). Are you aware of any dangerous substance or material that I can come in contact with if I disassemble the watch? For example I read that the indigloo is made of luminescent “indium tin oxide” (as reported here https://www.chemeurope.com/en/encyclopedia/Phosphor.html) and that this material can cause irritation to the respiratory tract If inhaled (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indium_tin_oxide). Any other stuff I should be aware of? Thanks in advance for your answers.
×
×
  • Create New...