Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Ok so another crazy post. Only joking 😉. Most watches that we are aquiring via ebay are tending to suffer from one of three things. Three things that stop beginners in their tracks. And these are the things i most want to learn even in my short learning span.  No. 1 issue- a broken balance staff pivot. No. 2 a missing or broken stem and No. 3 a shafted hairspring. So 1 and 2 is going to require a lathe, not a cheap item . But i managed a good one fully kitted out for 180 Betties, a very lucky find but patience paid off. And lastly No. 3 a hairspring vibrator required possibly, a more expensive item, harder to find and not something the missus should be toying with either. Pun unintended but hey it just came out that way so deal with it. This post is to ask a couple of questions regarding repivoting. Ive watched a few you vids on it so  i have a general idea what to do. The questioning is aimed mostly towards pros and their opinions on how well it works ?  how easy  is it to do ? and what sort of equipment and material is required ? Or is it just better to buy and fit a new staff, bearing in mind a staking set will be needed and thats providing a replacement staff is available. A full staff turning is almost definitely out of the question for the beginner, but I'm game after a few months of lathe practice and a new scope acquisition.  I will be asking about the stem manufacturing and the hairspring replacement in the future if thats ok. Thank you for any comments and advice in advance.  ( Nickelsilver 🙂 )

  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)

For a balance staff I find I'm as fast making a new one as repivoting; also, with repivoting there are several pitfalls that can turn the job sour and you're left with a useless staff, so you end up making it anyway. I would always make a full drawing before either. Technically, a properly done repivoting is as good as original, there's no reason it would fail or perform less well.

 

For trickier parts like a pinion, it is usually far faster and easier to repivot than remake.

9 hours ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

A full staff turning is almost definitely out of the question for the beginner, but I'm game after a few months of lathe practice and a new scope acquisition. 

Doing a correct repivoting of a balance staff isn't easier than making a whole staff, it's just possibly quicker, but in my experience not really unless it's an ultra high grade staff (or marine chronometer or something). Getting the staff running perfectly true to drill, drilling a truly concentric hole that is straight and to proper depth, making the plug with the correct friction fit, fitting the plug, then turning the plug to final size and form and length, finally finishing off in the Jacot*- there are a lot of skills wrapped up there.

 

*using the Jacot you really find out if your plug was fitted correctly!

Edited by nickelsilver
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 hour ago, nickelsilver said:

For a balance staff I find I'm as fast making a new one as repivoting; also, with repivoting there are several pitfalls that can turn the job sour and your're left with a useless staff, so you end up making it anyway. I would always make a full drawing before either. Technically, a properly done repivoting is as good as original, there's no reason it would fail or perform less well.

 

For trickier parts like a pinion, it is usually far faster and easier to repivot than remake.

Doing a correct repivoting of a balance staff isn't easier than making a whole staff, it's just possibly quicker, but in my experience not really unless it's an ultra high grade staff (or marine chronometer or something). Getting the staff running perfectly true to drill, drilling a truly concentric hole that is straight and to proper depth, making the plug with the correct friction fit, fitting the plug, then turning the plug to final size and form and length, finally finishing off in the Jacot*- there are a lot of skills wrapped up there.

 

*using the Jacot you really find out if your plug was fitted correctly!

Thanks Nicklesilver very informative and helpful as always. I would love to learn to do both  if at all possible, i was under an assumption that the repivot might have been a little easiler. I'm  expecting some heavy practicing and probably a few years down the line before i could turn out anything half decent, but i am patient, the skill will either come or it wont, if i dont try then it definitely wont. Thanks again.

  • 1 year later...
Posted (edited)

Hi again here,

Old thread, but if still interessed in repivoting wersus new staff turning, I can give my 5p here.

This is not my routine way of balance staff turning, but I haven't made routine turning video, just this one I have. But it shows the technic I use when needed to work on T rest.

The repivoting of balance staff is something I generally don't recommend as prefered way. You can see the balance in the video is useless and I used it just to show the process, as a friend asked me to.

Repivoting takes about 10 minutes to me and saves dissassembling and reassembling of the balance. Staff turning usually takes 30 min. and then assembling, trueing, poising checks and so on may be another 30. The both ways usually will reqire regulation of the balance, but it strongly depends on what is expected as watch performance - is it needed to be chronometer-like adjusted or just good strong beat is enough.

Another helpfull video shows how to take off the brokend old balance staff from the balance, when it is the riveted type.

This all are simple phone recorded videos, so quality of the record is bad, but anyway, I hope, still can be helpfull

Edited by nevenbekriev
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 3
Posted
33 minutes ago, nevenbekriev said:

Hi again here,

Old thread, but if still interessed in repivoting wersus new staff turning, I can give my 5p here.

This is not my routine way of balance staff turning, but I haven't made routine turning video, just this one I have. But it shows the technic I use when needed to work on T rest.

The repivoting of balance staff is something I generally don't recommend as prefered way. You can see the balance in the video is useless and I used it just to show the process, as a friend asked me to.

Repivoting takes about 10 minutes to me and saves dissassembling and reassembling of the balance. Staff turning usually takes 30 min. and then assembling, trueing, poising checks and so on may be another 30. The both ways usually will reqire regulation of the balance, but it strongly depends on what is expected as watch performance - is it needed to be chronometer-like adjusted or just good strong beat is enough.

Another helpfull video shows how to take off the brokend old balance staff from the balance, when it is the riveted type.

This all are simple phone recorded videos, so quality of the record is bad, but anyway, I hope, still can be helpfull

Appreciate the reply on an old post nev, yes helpful videos thank you. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Righty ho, I re-serviced the chrono module and got a reasonable result with minimal loss of amplitude when not running the chrono and about 30 degrees loss when running. Great. The problem is now that the chrono (and movement) stops running after about a minute or so, a tap on the watch starts it running again. No issues with the movement running when the chrono is stopped. Going to service it yet again, obviously some residual issues with friction in the chrono module (Very frustrating - I wish there was some way of testing it as I go!) I also seem to have a problem with the cannon pinion where the movement is running continuously (with the chrono stopped) but it's losing significant time / stopping. This is one of those two piece ETA style with a driving wheel pressed over the cannon pinion, obviously arranged for driving the chrono module. I had no issues with this prior to service and just added a small amount of grease between the driving wheel and the centre cannon pinion as the technical guide required. What's the best way of tightening these up? I would like to replace it but I guess this is going to be hard to find as it is dedicated to the DD chrono movement. 
    • He uses the micrometer cap, but he leaves the spring out (you can see that in the video). If you leave the spring in, the spindle will move up as well (as shown by @Knebo).
    • Seems like he doesn't have the micrometer cap  attached to the spindle so he can only push down but cannot pull up? If the cap screws into the spindle I guess you don't need the spring? I only have a "normal" Seitz so I really have no idea. 
    • Do you have a part number for the bearing shim lock tool?
    • Yes in my opinion the 3/4HP is plenty but it’s your decision & yes it does come with speed control but foot operation so my reason for changing to potentiometer was because my leg shakes so it was like me revving the lathe & anyway I prefer to set the speed. I & a few others that I recommended the motor to run a Pultra 10mm lathe so if you have a 6 or 8mm B & L then it will be plenty, if you have seen any of my videos you will have seen that when using a graver I run quite slow without any problems. Dell
×
×
  • Create New...