Jump to content

1903 (circa, and later) open face with Minerva model #3 movement.


Recommended Posts

The fourth of five pocket watches my brother sent to me to service: an open-face with Minerva model #3. Straight-line anchor lever, "visible pallets", double roller, 15 jewels. The case is silver with rose gold trim, marked 0.800 fine, stamped with the Halbmond und Reichskröne of the German assay office for export to Germany, case serial #754944. I will edit, or reply, to include more details later if I am able to learn more.
This one has a fine Swiss movement in marvelous shape, wheels are perfect, pivots look great, everything in there in meticulous shape and ready to run, needing only a good cleaning, lube, and possibly regulation. But the case on the other hand...just refer to the pictures below. The bow has somehow been *torn* from its pendant. The crystal looks as though it has been skittering down a street like an expensive stand-in for a hockey puck. And the face had the classic marks of some careless "tech" prying the dial off by force: divots in the porcelain directly on the other side of the dial feet (4:30 & 10:30). So for this watch, it is more in need of case restoration than any mechanical repair. But that's okay; I've been practicing this kind of thing.
 - For the crystal - I have been buffing it with basic toothpaste. (Chuck wanted to keep the original if possible.)  And it's actually coming around, slowly but surely.
 - For the dial - I have already repaired it with my dial enamel and it looks loads better; barely noticeable at a foot or two away.
 - For the pendant - If you look at the first picture, with the dial facing you, the right side of the pendant has a kind of brass fitting, or ferule. I am turning a piece of brass to that exact size and shape. It will be mounted using silver solder, which I will build up around the edges where the original metal is absent. Then to gently file and buff down to shape. After that I will reinstall the bow.

EDIT:  included original photo of the movement which I forgot to do earlier.

131077737_226524832184759_6275257664733350515_n.jpg

131011975_475713503395973_8993972242837061656_n.jpg

131121278_748198669124370_250439893859440597_n.jpg

20201231_215434.jpg

20201231_215145.jpg

130713714_401856541025295_1855678026038127338_n.jpg

Edited by KarlvonKoln
Edit to include extra photo.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hell0 @nevenbekriev. Thank you for your advice. I have removed the old setting using my staking set--I will keep the KIF spring, since it is still good.  I am awaiting the replacement setting, and will update when I do that. In the mean time, I looked at the escape wheel and it looks ok. What do you think?    
    • Aloha All, I recently bought this Seitz tool on eBay, but it is missing some pushers reamers.  I ended up ordering new parts for those that were missing before I received the actual Seitz tool (bad idea).   Upon inspecting the pushers/bits, I noticed 23 of the 56 provided with the set had no numbers. Further inspection revealed a huge difference in the quality of those unnumbered.  Do all Seitz pushers/bits have a number on them?  I'm pretty sure that 33 of the 56 I received are cheap Chinese knockoffs.  The worst part is that I ordered $80 of parts to replace the missing pushers/bits, and now I'm looking to return the tool. I'm not crazy, right? If these are Seitz parts, they should all be numbered, correct? The first two pictures are the Seitz (numbered), and the other pictures are the suspect parts.  Will I even be able to get a refund?  Thanks, Frank     
    • It was £10 + min fee, total £16, could not leave it there. Its a Stanton A.D.2. http://stanton-instruments.co.uk/
    • Chief- The picture below shows the three parts from the dial side that are most useful to "fingerprint" a movement in conjunction with the diameter of the movement.  That's why forum participants are always asking for dial side photos in posts asking for identification.  As far as the setting lever screw, it actually sits loose in the main plate. The threads engage the setting lever below, and the elongated stem above the shoulder sticks through a hole in one of the bridge plates so that it's held captive if unscrewed all the way.  So you may be fine as far as that goes. 
    • So I found what I believe is the setting lever screw! Am I right in thinking the screw next to the click is the correct one for the setting lever? However if it is, it doesn't fit in the hole which I believe is for it! I can get the lever to sit nicely on the stem and line up with a hole, but the screw only goes as far as the shoulder and stops. It's as though the hole is too small! The dial side has been disassembled by the way, the other wheels are in my tray
×
×
  • Create New...