Jump to content

Adjusting For Isochronism And Positions


WillFly

Recommended Posts

One of the requirements of US Railroad Approved pocket watches is that they have been adjusted for isochronism and at least 5 positions.

 

Is it possible to describe what the watchmaker has to do in the mechanism to make these adjustments?

 

If it's too complicated to do so in so many words, I quite understand - perhaps there's a book which explains the process...

 

Ah - just spotted this: http://mb.nawcc.org/showwiki.php?title=Watch_Adjustment

Edited by WillFly
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Positional error can be produced by many factors but the main reasons are to do with

 

- Lubrication - too much can be as bad as too little.

 

- Magnetism.

 

Once those are resolved and the watch still shows positional error:

 

Error between dial up and dial down: The balance staff pivots are most likely at fault. Either bent or require rounding (speeds up) flattening (slows down)

 

Then there is side positions where the weight of the balance comes into play - this is where it is important for the balance assembly to be in poise. I say balance assembly and not just the balance wheel as the hairspring, and roller also can affect poise.

 

There are other factors which can affect timekeeping in different positions but these are the common ones.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Error between dial up and dial down: The balance staff pivots are most likely at fault. Either bent or require rounding (speeds up) flattening (slows down)

 

Ah - I've had two three watches where the movement runs like a train face down, but runs slow or even stops when face up...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmm... That can also be a symptom of the balance staff pivots being too short and thus there is too much end shake (movement up and down between the endstone jewels). This can cause the balance to foul the pallet cock with dial up (effectively stopping the watch) or the balance spring to foul the centre wheel in dial down (which can cause the watch to gain drastically or stop it).

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Good question!! Anyone know of a substitute movement??!! 🤔🙏
    • Interesting issue that I just noticed: this Seiko 5actus Watch from 1977 has a calibre listing on the dial of 7019-8030R but on the case back it says 7019-8010!! Like a mis-printed coin, is this watch therefore worth a lot of money for its rarity?? 🤪😲🤔🤪
    • I wish that was the case. The Aegler movements used in the early days by Wilsdorf & Davis (for brands like Rolex and Rolco) came in several sizes and without designated calibre numbers that survive.  They become a bit easier to identify during the 1920s. Below is an Aegler-Rebberg, 25.74mm in diameter. It’s from a woman’s Rolex wristwatch. Stamped Rebberg and 500 on the dial plate (but it isn’t a Rebberg 500, it’s the wrong size).  I’d be interested if anyone can identify the movement.  It is based off the Aegler Nr.1, circa 1903, but they based many many calibres of different sizes on it. The closest I have to a positive ID is the  ‘Rolex Nr.50’ circa 1917, but no dial side images or movement sizes are available in the references. There are identical looking movements in many sizes.  The 25.74mm of this movement is a particularly strange size for the era, it equates to 11.41 lignes.      Best Regards, Mark
    • It looks like this movement comes with a number of different shock settings. Emmywatch shows that it comes in versions with no shock settings, 'Incabloc', 'shock resist', and 'Supershock'. Perhaps the different settings position the impulse jewel/roller table in a non-ideal position relative to the pallet fork/guard pin. Are you able to check under high magnification if the pallet fork and roller table are able to operate without any interference? Just for fun I took a look and I have one FHF 70 in my collection, a West End Secundus with a non-shock protected FHF70. I had a note with the watch that said, "Movement is stamped 'FHF 70', but the FHF70 looks to have sub-seconds instead of center seconds movement (??)" but that a google search turned up both types for this movement. EDIT: I just took a look in my parts drawer and I have a few of these movements, both in center seconds and sweep seconds, but they all are non-shock protected.  
    • Any info on this watch would help. I know that it's sterling from London but I could not match the o letter date or make out makers mark.  Is the movement maker Camberwell or Lamberwell?   If I give it a twist it will run for about ten seconds.  $45 yard sale find.  I don't think that I want to service a fusee.  What quality is it?
×
×
  • Create New...