Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi Gents,

 

I have just replace the mainspring in a Longines 6942. I have also stripped and lubricated the watch. After reassemble the watch doesn't work after winding but if i blow on the mainspring the watch starts and continues to run. Any suggestions would be gratefully received.

I should add that i have been told the watch hasn't worked at all in years.

Posted
42 minutes ago, kev said:

I have just replace the mainspring in a Longines 6942. I have also stripped and lubricated the watch. After reassemble the watch doesn't work after winding but if i blow on the mainspring the watch starts and continues to run. Any suggestions would be gratefully received.

You must mean if you gently blow on the hairspring it jumps into life or?
There usually are two reasons for this behavior.
1. You still have some dirt in the pivot holes.
2. The lubrication on the balance jewels are to rich.

If you by accident lubricated the pallet fork it should just run for a while and then stop.
So you should just remove the end caps on the balance jewels, use a very sharp peg wood to clean the pivot holes or just dip them into a one dip solution and shake. 
Put a small drop of 9010 on the flat side of the end caps and reassemble.The dot of oil should just cover around 30 -40 percent of the end caps area. Put the jewels back into place.
Remove the pallet fork, clean the pivot hole on the plate, push both sides of the pallet fork into Rodico so it will be clean, clean the fork bridge pallet hole. Put all back and don´t lubricate the jewels.
Put the balance bridge into place and of they should go..

If you still struggle just howl again and I might put this Russian movement away and make a small PDF guide.

Posted

Hi HSL thanks for the help. Unfortunately I have stripped, Cleaned and reassembled as you described but I still have the same problem. Each time the watch is stopped for setting it will not restart unless I blow on the hairspring. Then everything appears to work fine.

Posted

That doesn't sound very good, this movement has the second stop function, if you pull out the winding stem it ticks until the second hand is in zero position. This is a quite handy function while setting the watch but might introduce some weird faults.

But as a fault finding exercise we could start here.

Begin with  releasing all power from the mainspring, you do this by lifting the click.
Pull the stem out and remove the balance bridge.
Remove the pallet cock and pallet fork.
Put the stem back in and put it in setting position. Now turn one or two times on the winding stem. Nothing should happen at this stage.
Push the stem into winding position, now you should have a release of power, the train wheels and escape wheel should rotate free.
Look at the escape wheel it should run free slightly longer than the train wheels. If not there is to much oil. Clean it off with Rodico.
When faultfinding you could clean out the oil from the escape since it just going to run for a short while. The oil already stuck on the pivot pin should be enough.

If everything runs great here we have a problem either in the pallet fork area or the balance area.
Sometimes the juvels are slightly different you could always try to switch them after you checked the drive train.
I will setup a test station trying to replicate the error but that might take a while. I got three volunteers.

 

IMG_20190203_133045.jpg

Posted

Just finished a quite extensive session with these beauties to try replicate the fault you mention.
Nothing except total loss off power by heavy dirt in the drive train would make it stop the balance from oscillating by it self. I used a small drop of maple syrup to simulate an old oil. So we can rule the drive train out.

I didn't find any worn balance pivots in my goodie bag just some broken ones so that test is unfortunately excluded and you just have to check the end shake and side shake with a couple of tweezers.

Here comes a small checklist from the tests.

Too much oil on the escape teeth made it hard to get oscillate by it self.

Dirt on either entry or exit pallet made it hard to get oscillate by it self.

Too much oil in the escape wheel pivot made it hard to get oscillate by it self.

Oil accidentally applied on  the pallet fork pivots made it hard to get oscillate by it self and later went into a halt.

Dry balance jewels made it occasionally  hard to get oscillate by it self.

Broken pivot jewel in the balance made it hard to get oscillate by it self and go to a stop when turned around.

Dirt in the impulse pin made it hard to get oscillate by it self.

Broken pivot on balance staff lower part made it hard to get oscillate by it self, stopped when turned around. 

A slight bend upwards on the pallet fork made it hard to get oscillate by it self.

Beat error lever accidentally moved out of position  made it hard to get oscillate by it self.

A magnetized  hairspring made it hard to get oscillate by it self.

To speed up this small investigation I had to add one more movement into the process it got to be the lucky one with magnetized hairspring.

So if you have cleaned the movement correctly and checked the items in the list I can't se any other reasons for the balance not to swing like on the one in the attached video.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

HSL, thank you for all of your help with this problem I really appreciate it. It would appear that the cause of the problem was a slight bend in the escape wheel top pivot. Everything now seems to be working fine. Success at last! 

I'm sorry it took so long to respond but I have ben away.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was wondering because of the alum idea. 
    • just a reminder about this test is it's not a perfect test it's a quick test. In other words you can adjust the banking pins that are both the same and visually this test will pass everything looks the same but both banking pins can be in the wrong place. although the majority of time when people are playing with banking pins I don't put them in the same place. one of things have to be careful of is I believe some of the pallet fork measuring tools that actually give you the roller jewel size are actually size so that I get confused? What I mean by this is if you inserted a whatever size in and are always told to go a slightly smaller I thought that the gauge itself its number corresponded to give you the exact number. So a lot of it depends upon the gauge itself I think you do want the roller jewel slightly smaller because it does have to fit in the slot and it does have a little bit a play. But if it's too small you will lose energy so does have to be sized right. Oh other things to check is? I'm attaching an Elgin sheet on checking the escapement I've seen references in the past to making sure that the slot in the four corn is nice and smooth and apparently you can end up with a rough slot and then the recommendation is to polisher clean that up. Not sure how well that's really going to work even if it has been the recommendation of other reference materials. yes art full plate watches fun when they don't work. This is where it's nice to have another set of eyes sometimes as maybe they'll find something you didn't  although that can add other issues. The owner of the shop provides himself on his skills of so now two of my watches have relocated to his bench to solve problems both real and imaginary I'm sure that will get fixed eventually hopefully. But still sometimes another set of eyes might see something that you're not. yes this sort of thing can be quite frustrating. Also makes for an interesting problem unless of course you're the one trying to solve the problem that it's a Escapement Elgin setting up the escapement.PDF
    • I’m not to sure mate! I’ve sent a picture! The crown is off a Tissot 1853 automatic limited edition T115427 A GP19 moto go watch!   
    • For years and I'm still using it I've been using something called SeaMonkey? It's a Mozilla product Basically outscore its Firefox plus an integrated email program. But not the same problems here a lot of times when things are upgraded they tend to be now aimed at very specific browsers like Firefox so I've had to switch to Firefox to respond to any of the messages on the group. So yes they do seem to be getting more browser specific and that may be a reason for others having complications especially if whatever you using hasn't been updated. So yes the world is getting more browser specific perhaps for security reasons. Even though I use a product that is updated on a regular basis is still has problems. So whatever you using for browser should be up to date and if is not recognized it's going to be a problem.
    • I did remember to ask at work and minor complication? Well I suppose technically two separate complications. First off glass mineral glass versus Seiko's Hardlex Glass. Don't know if other companies have their own class or not and a basic class for crystals is probably not the same as window glass it would be more transparent. It becomes obvious if you're looking at a sheet of flat crystal glass versus window glass it's definitely more transparent you can see it when you look at the edges of it window glass looks green. No idea how that changes physical characteristics other than optical. Then we also have thickness like the Seiko five's there crystals are really sick compared to other things and I'm guessing that makes things different. In the first link it talks about Sapphire versus mineral glass. One other thing is bothering me though when I'm reading this is where is the source material? What I mean by this is could we end up with multiple generations of salespeople quoting the same sales tactic or information and we don't actually know because you don't have a source reference? Let me quote something off the website it's brittle oh dear I was sad? Except it's not immune to damage it can crack where shatter under extreme force or impact. So what is the definition of extreme force or impact? Then is that more or less extreme then mineral glass?  Then regarding the price difference while back I had asked the owner where the Sapphire came from and basically wherever he can get the cheapest. So typically ordered from a variety of online supply watch parts in the US and  aliexpress China.. Then yes it does make a difference because we go through a lot of glass crystals and sapphire https://thehorologylab.com/sapphire-crystal-vs-mineral-glass-which-is-best-for-your-watch#google_vignette Then I guess one is glass not glass when it goes by another name? Hardlex Looks like it's purely a Seiko product but now I wonder if other watch companies have their own special glass? I didn't remember from past experience my favorite was people exposed to welding you can find little blobs a metal stuck to the watch case the crystal still intact but there's little burnt holes were bits of metal had actually burnt into the crystal but it was still there. Okay website below starts off with Sapphire sounds good but Apparently it can shatter easier then Hardlex. https://theslenderwrist.com/hardlex-crystal/ One other thing is what I'm reading to websites would be back to I want to see the test results? Often times weren't looking for a subject will find websites where I basically called them these are better than that by the way but sometimes I'll find websites that I will call book review websites were basically the review other websites other material and don't really introduce anything new to the subject. As I said these websites look quite nice which is why I'm giving you a link but where's the test results the definition of extreme how extreme to break a sapphire versus a glass or Hardlex?  
×
×
  • Create New...