Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Hi,

I recently purchased a previously-owned quad watch winder to keep my automatics fresh overnight.  The price was very attractive and the pictures were good but, since the article was in a different city, I was not able to see it in person before I purchased it.  When I received the package, I found out that one of the winder motors spun without driving the watch holder.  The seller hadn't disclosed this problem, even though I specifically asked.  It was an obvious mechanical problem which I set about to repairing.  I'm documenting my findings here so that if someone in the future experiences the same problem, they might have a clue as to how to repair the problem.  These winders are common and manufactured in China as per the "Made In" sticker.

The winder consists of two 6V DC 10 RPM universal motors configured to drive a dish shaped watch holder.  Each motor is capable of winding up to two watches simultaneously.  In my winder, the right watch holder just remained stationary as the motor spun, indicating that either a belt had slipped or a clutch mechanism had failed.  In either case, it was necessary for me to extract the motor assembly.  I began by removing the watch holder from the shaft of the motor (remove the foam insert and then loosen the screw holding the part to the shaft of the motor).  Then I removed the bottom panel since there was no other means to access the insides.  Once opened, I disconnected the motor from the driver board and removed the four screws holding it to the baseplate (see photo 1 below).

Once extracted and on the bench, I proceeded to inspect it.  The motor is clamped in a plastic base and is coupled to an axle using a drive dog (see photo 2).  When I disassembled the plastic base and removed the motor, the cause became apparent - the rubber drive dog was stripped. You can see the rubber residue that was dug out by the shaft. The receiving hole for the motor shaft should have been shaped to fit the keyed shaft  (see photos 3 & 4).  The rubber dog was just too soft to accept the torque of the geared-down motor.  Any stalling of the watch holder transferred to damage to the dog.  My solution was simple.  I drilled a hole in the coupling housing and inserted a screw that would act as a key to prevent the motor shaft from rotating relative to the coupler (see photo 5).  I decided to do this to both motors to prevent a similar fate for the operational assembly.  Once repaired and back together, the winder was as good as new.

20181208_174233.jpg

20181208_174107.jpg

20181208_174147.jpg

20181208_213331.jpg

20181208_213459.jpg

Edited by robmack
refine verbiage.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Believe the relume (not a fan) was done a long time after the damage. 
    • I can only think of some chemical reaction to reluming
    • I have a little milling attachment for my WW lathe, but very rarely use it and not for wheel and pinion cutting. For that I use a small Sixis 101 milling machine. I normally do direct dividing, but sometimes have to do an odd count and use the universal index which also fits on the Sixis.   Back in the day when I didn't have a mill, I would cut gearing on my Schaublin 102. It has a universal dividing attachment which fits the back of the spindle. Both it and the one for the Sixis are 60:1 ratio, and with the set of 4  index plates I can do almost any division. When I've had to do a strange high count prime number, I print a disc with the needed division and just place the plunger on the dot. Any position error is reduced by a factor of 60 so still plenty accurate.   The machines are a mess in the pics as I'm in the process of making a batch of barrels for a wristwatch 🙃.   This is the Sixis. The head can also be placed vertically, as can the dividing spindle.   Dividing plates. The smaller ones fit another dividing spindle.   Universal divider for the Sixis. I put it together with parts from an odd Sixis spindle that takes w20 collets, like the Schaublin 102, and a dividing attachment from a Schaublin mill.     The dividing attachment for the 102. The gear fits in place of the handwheel at the back of the headstock.   And the little milling attachment for the WW lathe. I just set it on the slide rest to illustrate the size, you can see from the dust on it it really doesn't get used much. I think only when I change bearing in the head, to kiss the collet head seat (grinding wheel still in the milling attachment).
    • I read a lot about the quality (or lack thereof) of Seiko's 4R, 6R, 8L  movements...or more specifically the lack of regulation from the factory. Especially when compared to similar priced manufactures using SW200's or ETA's. I thought I'd ask those more in the know, do the 4R's and 6R's deserve their bad reputation, is it fairly easy for someone with minimal skills (or better yet a trained watch mechanic) to dial in these movements to a more acceptable performance.    For background I spent more on a 1861 Speedy years ago, expecting that the advertised 0-15s/d  would probably perform more like 5-7s/d. In reality it's been closed to 2-4s/d. 
×
×
  • Create New...