Jump to content

What Am I Doing Wrong? Removing Stem


mikaeel

Recommended Posts

I am a complete newbie, so forgive me if this question is dumb. But i have a serious problem. I have bought two cheap mechanical watches and a cheap chinese movement. Every time i take a stem out, part of the setting/winding mechanism falls out. If I manage to get it back in the movement no longer winds properly. My question is why am I unable to remove the stem with out the piece seen next to the stem falling out?

 

This has happened on all three movements when I have removed the stem. The piece had either fallen in the case or with the chinese movement it just fell on to my work area when I disengaged the stem.post-323-0-37959900-1411257291_thumb.jpg

 

Any help with this will be greatly appreciated.

 

Mikaeel

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi,

   Some watches need to be in certain positions in regards to winding or setting position of the crown before removing stem. It appears from what happened that your watches should have been in the winding position. That can be a little tricky because you are pulling the stem out which can cause it to slip into setting position if you aren't careful. If your watches had stayed in the winding position the winding wheel you had fall out would have been held in place by tension.

Charles K

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it not a fact that on some watches the winding/setting clutch mechanism is actually held together and in place by the winding stem? By removing the stem, if the watch is a certain side up, these parts will indeed fall out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the speedy replies. It'll be a week or so  before I can get my hands a couple of new movements. When I get them I will give it a shot with the advice I was given here. I just find it ironic that I've been able to remove and reinstall the balance and escape wheel in working order on two of the movements, but cant take out and reinstall a stem.

 

And WillFly are you saying that I should turn the watch face up when removing the stem, since the piece always falls out when the watch or movement is face down?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes - as far as I know, the clutch/winding pieces will usually stay in if the watch is on one position, but fall out if the watch is in the opposite orientation. They have to come out, of course, otherwise they couldn't be serviced, replaced or cleaned.

 

Cheers,

 

Will

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi all,

   Will is right in saying the winding stem holds this winding gear in place. However depending upon the movement they can fall out either way watch is facing when stem is removed. Sometime it can be found under the dial and sometimes just drop lower in movement so that stem can't be replaced until winding pinion is repositioned. Normally if you remove the stem while the watch is in the winding position the pressure from the spring pushing the sliding gear against the winding pinion is enough to hold things in place long enough to get stem out. However after I say that I must say that after movement is removed from case the stem should be replaced because after stem is removed those two parts are just being held in place by friction and they will jump out, run away and play hide and go seek when you aren't looking. Also I may have misunderstood your question a bit. I thought you were talking about removing the stem so watch could be removed from the case. After that stem should be replaced into movement until you are ready to remove the keyless works as you showed in the picture you posted. Hope I didn't totally confuse everyone.

Charles K

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nice interesting diver Razz, i have a sheffield dress watch, different movement altogether. Could be a wrong motion works part, how does the setting feel before fitting the cannon pinion, clutch and intermediate wheel meshing ok ?  The less traditional setting design could be suspect, the second wheel has a slip clutch assembly, that most likely needs looking at. LA is 42 ° Razz Tbh i  much prefer to call the complete unit the lever, then use the seperate names for all of its components. Such as guard pin, fork, fork horns, fork slot, lever arm, pallets , pallet arms, pallet slot, pallet stones. I suppose pallet fork is the combination of the two opposite ends that make up the lever, its also called the anchor which is descriptive of its appearance.  Its a pretty basic 1930s  swiss lever movement H and yes Nev was meaning the pallet fork.
    • The pallet fork should really be called a lever, English lever, Swiss lever etc but most people including myself call it a pallet fork.
    • Seiko have case numbers, I  can't see it on your photos.  If you can find that we can look for a genuine crown.  If not, you need to measure the diameter of the stem, the distance between the lugs and the depth of the lugs.  The case number will be something like this. 
    • I'm not sure what kind of movement this is, but I'm curious to know if you're using the word "lever" as a synonym for "pallet fork"?
    • Actually kind of rough, maybe munute wheel pinion problems? Is the 2.73mm canion oinion which seems rarer and not availble on Cousins UK. The seconds hand works and suprising nice amplitude but don't know the lift angle and BE this one says 17 j but is a pin pallet as well. Cap jewels on the escape and drive train pivots. Interestingly in has both water proof and shock resistant on the caseback and dial. Puts this around 1969 or '70? The double bezel that works independently is cool has the pi symbol on each. Wonder if it can be used like a slide rule ir something...
×
×
  • Create New...