Jump to content

Speeding Up An Omega Electronic F300 Chronometer


Recommended Posts

Is it fairly simple to regulate one of these it is running 1 to 2 minutes slow per month. The watch is an Omega electronic f300 Chronometer from 1973. It is on its way to me and i don't have pictures of the insides yet. but this is what it looks like  it has a 37000000 serial number and a 1260 caliber movement

Thanks.

 

post-144-0-20943100-1397960069_thumb.jpg

post-144-0-18097600-1397960071_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow - I've never seen one of these before!

Made with technology licensed from Bulova if I remember correctly and in my opinion a better movement than Bulova. I have both so I feel justified to comment on them. My Omega is a Seamaster Cone F300 with the same movement as the one in this thread, and my Bulova is a genuine Space View.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Copied from another form:

Re: How are these movements regulated ? (F300)

There is a method of adjustment which is easy enough in theory but, as with so many things, takes a little work. Oh, and it takes ages to get it spot on.

First things first:

If you look at the movement you will notice that just after 12 (on this orientation) there are two minuses and a plus on the bridge. Here they are in close up and the other way up, just to offer a little challenge!

As you can see, while this version is a Zenith rather than an Omega it is still an ESA 9162.

Now, you see those two bobbins? They can be turned, very carefully, and a notch at a time, inwards and outwards. You need to mount the watch firmly and use two soft but sharp things, plastic needles are good (but toothpicks will do) to apply even pressure to both sides of the bobbin as you turn it. Don't use metal as it will scratch stuff up and leave detritus and don't use a single one as everything is rather carefully balanced

At least in theory, one notch of one bobbin is equivalent to two seconds in 24 hours. I have always alternated from one bobbin to the other (a notch left then a notch right and so on) and nothing has broken.

So, the usual deal: time the watch over 24 hours, do the maths and then, working one notch at a time, on both sides (and, most importantly keeping track of how many on a sheet of paper - to put it back right when you screw up!) adjust the difference.

Time it for another twenty four hours and then repeat the process with a smaller discrepancy and so on until you are reduced to trying to do half a notch. Then stop - beyond that madness lies

However, two warnings.

1) If the watch has not been serviced you will succeed in getting tolerable accuracy. The 9162 has torque to spare. Torque enough to destroy itself while working very nicely. Think about it! After a proper service you can reasonably expect to get accuracy you can brag about and you will be saving these wonderful movements for posterity!

2) Like any wristwatch, these are very, very easy to break. Ham fisted owners are, after stripped index wheels and leaky batteries, the most common reason for 9162 death. I'm all in favour of you breaking your watch this way as it increases my spares pool. You might feel differently. Buy a few old Accutrons and break them first if you do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ok a notch to the left and a notch to the right because the + sign is in the middle right?  I am guessing I would need the tool that fits the shape of the  three pointed"screw things" I don't know the technical names is there a screw to loosen first in order to make the adjustment? I found a really good technical right up on how to service these but it is for an Omega 1250 movement but I am guessing the principals are the same? Feel free to chime in because chances are most people would have more experience than me. The watch was cleaned and oils in the last 3 years , I just want to adjust so It isn't so far off. But I guess 2 minutes max per month isn't bad but I thought it being a "chronometer" rating that it would need to be within -4 to +6 seconds per day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The movement is based on the Bulova but the detail is very different.

Mine, like yours, keeps good time but like yours is not perfect. I am living with it as it is in the meantime.

As you probably have gathered I do like to work on my own watches, but when it comes to Accutrons and F300s I leave well alone. My Bulova will be getting sent to a specialist in the near future for a service and regulation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You realise 2 minutes a month is 120 seconds in ~60 days = 2 seconds a day, which is better than the 4 to 6 seconds a day you mentioned wanting it to be?

It sounds like one notch on each wheel will get it to virtually zero seconds a day but like you, I would definitely use the correctly shaped tool, shouldn't be too hard to whittle away at a piece of plastic or wood to make a three pronged tool that's close enough shape to work well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Geo, I'm just starting off in learning how to repair watches and clocks.

Picked up a load of junk movements from EBay to dismantle and learn how all the sub assemblies work, and to get used to working on components that small. Also got a few inexpensive new movements to dismantle and (hopefully) rebuild. Last couple of things I've picked up are a weight driven wall clock that needs a good restore.

Enough to keep me going for the spring and summer,

My number one problem is how to ensure those components that just love to escape, do not make it off the bench! I've thought of attaching male Velcro pads to the bottom of the rubber mat and just attaching the edge of it to myself so it forms a lip and prevents any parts escaping...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You realise 2 minutes a month is 120 seconds in ~60 days = 2 seconds a day, which is better than the 4 to 6 seconds a day you mentioned wanting it to be?

It sounds like one notch on each wheel will get it to virtually zero seconds a day but like you, I would definitely use the correctly shaped tool, shouldn't be too hard to whittle away at a piece of plastic or wood to make a three pronged tool that's close enough shape to work well.

Ya the 1-2 minutes per month sounded high when I wrote this post but it doesn't hurt to know how to make tiny adjustments to the movement is need be in the future.

Great help and thanks to everyone who submitted something useful to the post

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thanks, ManSkirtBrew.  I started looking for a setup like yours and ran across this.  It was about half the price of the JKA Feintaster (depending on what auction you were in), and it's a Bergeon.  I bought it because I thought the price was fair (eBay - Buy it now), and I'm a sucker for vintage tools. It also has a table, so it should be easy to use for measuring jewels. I wonder if the the contact points can be changed out. Bergeon seems to manufacture new tables and accessories for the contemporary dial version. What do you guys think of it? I'm sorry this post seems to have taken a detour. I'm new here so let me know if I should start a new topic.
    • This is a flying cutter, usual one. The cutter itself is shown in the pictures in the first message, it is made of broken tungsten carbide drill bit. I asure that all the angles of the cutter are as they should be. I have video - little older one - that I made when onse making the same kind of winding pinion for a Poljot 2200, which is even smaller than this one. It is not easy to see in the video, but the tool rest moves about 1mm towards the object in Y direction and then returns back untill cutter is rotating. Then the spindle is rotated one tooth ahead and everything repeated untill all teeth are cut.
    • After a bit further research could it possibly be an AS 970?
    • Latest project was a non-running ebay purchase with an FHF70 movement. I stripped and cleaned it, reassembled it, and got it running. So far so good, nothing damaged AFAIK.  I was oiling the top jewel on the balance (the one in the cock) which was a slightly unusual shock setting. I removed the spring (3 leaves) which was part of a chaton holding the cap jewel. This left the hole jewel behind which I retrieved with rodico and then lost it. I was taking it off the rodico, very gently as I thought, with tweezers, and then it just disappeared.  Fast forward a week, I got a donor movement, non-running, with the plan to just take the shock jewel that I’d lost. It was the same movement but had standard incabloc settings, and was steel rather than copper/brass.  I changed the cock and balance complete and it ran, not very well. I switched the lower jewel setting, cleaned and oiled both jewels and the replacement balance. Without the pallet fork the balance swings very nicely with a puff of air. With the fork in place, balance out, it flicks side to side nicely with power in the mainspring.  Put them together and it doesn’t run. The impulse jewel sits in the fork and it stops.      Any suggestions how I proceed? In case you didn’t follow that I have 2 FHF70 movements, nothing broken as far as I can tell, but mixing up the balance wheels and jewel settings results in a non runner. 
    • Oh and this almost perfect third wheel pivot and slightly set mainspring  Ah ok yes i see what you mean, good idea. I'll try that if i fluff this one up. The image isn't great quality but i like the idea though.
×
×
  • Create New...