Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello,

 

I have recently bought this watchmakers lathe and wanted to identify it's manufacturer. Since there is no maker's mark anywhere on the machine I started googling and found out that this thing is actually pretty odd in the way it was built.

Firstly the (presumably) hardened bed surfaces seem to have been screwed to the base and the screw heads ground over. I didn't find any similar lathe where this was done.

Second thing that I didn't find anywhere else is that there is no slot cut all the way through the bed so the normal method of attaching steady rests or cross slides to the bed with a bolt from the bottom isn't possible. Here it is done like in most head- and tail stocks with an eccentric clamping mechanism from the top to clamp both to the bed and the cross slide. Again something I haven't found else where.

Because of the color of the tarnished paint and overall style of the machine I believe it may be of american origin.

Another piece of potentially important information is, that I have another head stock of a more modern Boley and it fits the bed perfectly.

 

If you have ever seen something like this before or could give me any information at all I would be very gracious. And of course if you have any more questions I would be glad to answer them. Thanks

Greetings from Germany

s-l1600-_6_.png

s-l1600-_5_.png

s-l1600-_8_.png

s-l1600-_7_.png

s-l1600-_1_.png

s-l1600.png

s-l1600-_3_.png

s-l1600-_2_.png

s-l1600-_4_.png

  • Like 3
Posted
15 hours ago, oenkyi said:

Firstly the (presumably) hardened bed surfaces seem to have been screwed to the base and the screw heads ground over. I didn't find any similar lathe where this was done.

yes I would say this is definitely unusual I don't think I've ever seen this either. But their are quite a few people manufacturing lathes for watchmakers and instrumentation and toolroom use that all can look similar. In addition to stuff that was made for factories. With often times will find pictures of factory tools with no identifications no marking and no idea what exactly they were designed for

then this part of the lathe looks quite interesting any idea why it's been designed this way?

image.png.e221a58c07a0ec6471e3b31fc7227c5e.png

 

Posted
19 hours ago, Dell said:

Have you had a look at lathes.co.uk/ watchmaker lathe

Hi, yeah I have done a lot of researching there

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

yes I would say this is definitely unusual I don't think I've ever seen this either. But their are quite a few people manufacturing lathes for watchmakers and instrumentation and toolroom use that all can look similar. In addition to stuff that was made for factories. With often times will find pictures of factory tools with no identifications no marking and no idea what exactly they were designed for

then this part of the lathe looks quite interesting any idea why it's been designed this way?

image.png.e221a58c07a0ec6471e3b31fc7227c5e.png

 

Yeah I thought so too. It seems to be original since the paint is the same. My theory is, that it is either some sort of an attachment point for an indexing assembly or for a collet closer like this one.

image.png.d33162d76ee0f1d51e92a4012ed76edf.png

Edited by oenkyi
image blocking text
  • Like 1
Posted
23 minutes ago, caseback said:

Any other markings than the "256"?Screenshot_20250417_192550_Chrome.thumb.jpg.450c1582eb0d2100c2e4056aed40ec5f.jpg

 

 

Yeah there are some numbers punched into some of the parts. Namely the base of the tail stock:

signal-2025-04-17-194851.thumb.jpeg.48463fb1a86ef1927a4d8d19c6d100d5.jpeg

the mounting block between bed and cross slide:

signal-2025-04-17-194851_002.thumb.jpeg.f5780fd70c29317becd1da3e2855a786.jpegsignal-2025-04-17-194851_003.thumb.jpeg.d6290e13596d1536c093756970c601ac.jpeg

the head stock:

signal-2025-04-17-194851_004.thumb.jpeg.e7419f4f9044b6901d516553c2b9f39d.jpeg

and some components of the cross slide assembly:

signal-2025-04-17-194851_005.thumb.jpeg.a9c42b429af7898c7c10fc19020567d4.jpegsignal-2025-04-17-194851_006.thumb.jpeg.15fff0613db4fd3cf573b7939c583274.jpeg

Posted

The different numbers are a clue to the lathe being a collection of parts although saying that some manufacturers said that any parts they made would all fit each other part within tolerance 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Sorry I have this thread forgotten. Now, why the stones break? Several reasons: One - the old stones are crunchy. Be careful! Two - wrong tweezers. Use brass ones. Three - wrong approach. The best way is not to grasp the stone close to working side. Grasp it for the middle part, the tweezers direction to be perpendicular to the stone. Use oscillating tilting movements when moving the stone.  Now several tips that are not read from the books, but found in my practice. They are good for my way of correcting pallet stones position: You don't need the heater for adjusting the stones position. The heater will be needed only to glue/fix the stone when the adjustment is already done.  The stone should seat tight enough in the slot without gluing. Tight enough so the movement will work normally and thus checking if the adjustment is correct is to be done before gluing. If the stone is loose in the slot, then heating and melting the shellac will make the stone move in by the capillary force. So, if the stone is loose in the slot, then find out if the stone is not correct or the slot is opened. If the slot is opened, then (in steel pallet forks) it is good idea to anneal locally only the small part that forms the slot before trying to close the slot. Also, put in the slot something slightly thinner than the pallet to limit the amount of bending If the stone must go out, the shellac can stay in place, it will not make the adjustment harder. Just bend the stone to break the bond between the shellac and stone. Then heating only will glue the stone again if the shellac is not old and degraded. If the stone must go in, then the shellac mus be removed from the slot bottom as to make space for the stone to go in. I often use pallet stones from USSR Slava alarm clock for pocket watches repair. Slava pallet stones are usually bigger (wider) than needed) and I grind/lap them to correct size for the slot. Grinding is of the side that never contacts the EW teeth. It is enough to put the stone on the lapping plate, pres on it with finger and move it forward/reverse several times while pressing, then check in the slot.  
    • I used a small ultrasonic for years until it died, but it does need to be large enough to fit jars in to hold your parts, and small parts ideally are in mesh baskets within the jars so you are not fishing them out one by one with tweezers. So the one you linked might be too small and this kind of thing really the minimum workable size
    • You'll probably find when you get the dial it's slightly under the stated size to start with. Depending on the dial I'd mount it on a mandrel then spin it in a drill using a hard sanding pad to reduce the diameter.
    • Thank you @AndyGSi for the heads up. It is supposed to pressed down by a metal ring/bezel. I haven’t tried it yet. Let me check. Alternatively I may reduce the diameter of the dial, but I would need to mask/protect its face from dirt.
×
×
  • Create New...