Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I am going to take a break from the 1917 watch. I have quite a few watches, some big projects, some hopefully not. I would like to get something serviced so I have a reliable daily watch. The 2 best candidates I have for this are a seiko 6309 and a slava 2427.

The seiko I bought as working, recently serviced. It wouldn't wind though. Sent it back and the seller serviced it again and found a piece was missing from the automatic works that he had left out the first time. It came back and was working but soon started running slow. Its fully + on the regulator, looses 5-10 mins a day. Low amplitude too, about 150 if my app is to be trusted. New main spring and service again maybe?

The slava I bought as an unknown but running watch. It gains about 1 min a day but. The winder never feels any different, just keeps winding. It does wind the watch though. The automatic works does also wind the watch. It stopped overnight though after wearing it all day. I'm assuming either weak main springs, or they are slipping. So when worn the auto works keeps it topped up maybe. This also has low amplitude. 

 

I've not worked on either of these 2 movements but i need an easy win. Which would you suspect to be the easiest one to tackle? This old trench watch has somewhat knocked my fledgling confidence. I have stripped automatic calender watches before, but they were full of broken parts, so although they went back together fine, I never got to see them run.

Pics for no reason other than I assume we all like pictures of watches

20250117_110014.thumb.jpg.38b8af416d0a0f4d238acd67cd017a33.jpg20250120_132452.thumb.jpg.a2936d3b121f81e84e80c34151219286.jpg

Edited by graemeW
Posted
3 minutes ago, AndyGSi said:

Both nice watches but I'd go for the Seiko being the simplest due to the double barrel and quickset date on the Slava.

I was leaning that way as the slava works well enough to use for now. Slava feels like a better made thing though.

Posted

Seiko 6309 is a very simple movement for an automatic day/date. No little springs. The problem might be that many people have tampered with that particular movement and the previous owner couldn't get it right. Someone might have "adjusted" the pallet jewels or hairspring and made everything worse, even beyond repair. Spare parts (used) are luckily plentiful and cheap. 6309 is a great movement for a beginner.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Malocchio said:

Seiko 6309 is a very simple movement for an automatic day/date. No little springs. The problem might be that many people have tampered with that particular movement and the previous owner couldn't get it right. Someone might have "adjusted" the pallet jewels or hairspring and made everything worse, even beyond repair. Spare parts (used) are luckily plentiful and cheap. 6309 is a great movement for a beginner.

I'm hoping that's not the case, but I'll see. The seller was a watchmaker, but they did manage to leave a part out of the auto works!

When they sent it back to me they advised it might be wise to fit a new spring.

To be clear, the watch was cheap enough. Because it was sold as working, and wasn't, the subsequent full strip, check and relube was free. Seller went above and beyond to be honest.

It does wind just fine now. I wore it for a week over which time it gradually slowed. Amplitude was always low, but I believe it's not that high on 6309 to start with.

I'll take it apart tomorrow before I order a mainspring just in case it needs anything else. May as well order springs for the slava too I guess.

I'm also aware that the holes for the barrel wears on these seikos, so if quite like to check that too.

Hope it's ok as I love this watch. I bought it for something reliable to wear while I mess with the antique watches, but it's not quite worked out like that 😂

Posted
3 hours ago, graemeW said:

I'm also aware that the holes for the barrel wears on these seikos, so if quite like to check that too.

Another problem is the bearing on the rotor so this may have something to do with the lack of power.

  • Like 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, AndyGSi said:

Another problem is the bearing on the rotor so this may have something to do with the lack of power.

I pushed the rotor round with my finger for a while the other day and the bearing felt smooth and quiet. Well, smooth and quiet enough for me to not be concerned. 

Posted
Just now, graemeW said:

I pushed the rotor round with my finger for a while the other day and the bearing felt smooth and quiet. Well, smooth and quiet enough for me to not be concerned. 

How level is it as you rotate, any signs of a wobble?

Posted
7 hours ago, graemeW said:

Amplitude was always low, but I believe it's not that high on 6309 to start with.

From what I've read (and my limited experience agrees), Seiko watches generally are designed to have amplitude lower than you would expect from a Swiss watch, but maintain that amplitude consistent for 24+ hours. If you've got over 200º 24 hours after a full wind I would conclude there's not much to be concerned about even if it only gets to, say, 240º when first wound. I have a tiny Seiko 1104A that got to 270º on a full wind after service, but a 6105 averaged around 210º fully wound and an older 6217 got to about 260º. All of these vintage watches run well and keep good time despite their low amplitude.

Posted
3 hours ago, AndyGSi said:

How level is it as you rotate, any signs of a wobble?

No wobble that I noticed, but I wasn't looking for it at the time.

18 minutes ago, GPrideaux said:

From what I've read (and my limited experience agrees), Seiko watches generally are designed to have amplitude lower than you would expect from a Swiss watch, but maintain that amplitude consistent for 24+ hours. If you've got over 200º 24 hours after a full wind I would conclude there's not much to be concerned about even if it only gets to, say, 240º when first wound. I have a tiny Seiko 1104A that got to 270º on a full wind after service, but a 6105 averaged around 210º fully wound and an older 6217 got to about 260º. All of these vintage watches run well and keep good time despite their low amplitude.

I think the amplitude was around 150, I'll wind it and check before I take it apart though. Not having manual wind is a bit of a pain.

Posted
3 minutes ago, graemeW said:

Not having manual wind is a bit of a pain.

Yes, I know. You can wind it with a screwdriver once you open the back. Obviously not an everyday solution but it's what you need to do when working on it. Take extra care letting down the mainspring! Do it perhaps half a turn at a time, and let the click back in after each half-turn, otherwise one slip and it will all unwind at once. Ask me how I know! Fortunately my spring, barrel and arbor survived the experience, but I wouldn't want to count on that.

If you don't have the technical manual for this movement yet, you can find a scan at https://www.thewatchsite.com/threads/seiko-calibers-technical-repair-manuals.15/.

Posted

I have decided against doing one of these next as there is little point without the main springs. I have ordered new springs for both and will look at these next weekend I think. I've ordered parts for 2 other watches too, a KNACKERED roamer and a nice buren.

In the mean time I guess I'll persevere with the 1917 watch.

Posted

I happen to be working on a Slava 2427 at the moment. The springs on the balance jewels are similar to those on a Vostok and others, but are smaller. They may also have shorter arms. I've got the knack of those on the Vostok, but the ones on the Slava were quite fiddly. The mainspring barrels are obviously smaller than most- 7mm if memory serves. Finding an appropriate winder may be problematic.  Balance pivots are apparently more fragile than most. They also apparently have a reputation for issues around the alternative canon pinion and wear between the rotor arm and it's axle. When it comes to assembly there are a couple of instances where a screw does two jobs - eg holding down the end of the bridge for the escape wheel and the centre sweep second and the end of the automatic bridge.

Posted
50 minutes ago, JohnL said:

I happen to be working on a Slava 2427 at the moment. The springs on the balance jewels are similar to those on a Vostok and others, but are smaller. They may also have shorter arms. I've got the knack of those on the Vostok, but the ones on the Slava were quite fiddly. The mainspring barrels are obviously smaller than most- 7mm if memory serves. Finding an appropriate winder may be problematic.  Balance pivots are apparently more fragile than most. They also apparently have a reputation for issues around the alternative canon pinion and wear between the rotor arm and it's axle. When it comes to assembly there are a couple of instances where a screw does two jobs - eg holding down the end of the bridge for the escape wheel and the centre sweep second and the end of the automatic bridge.

Thanks for the heads up.

I won't need spring wonders hopefully, got new springs.

Ill be careful with thebpivots and shock settings and tale my time making sure I understand how it goes together.

I'm hoping wear isn't an issue. Firstly, the watch is perfect. Not a mark or scratch on it. It's like new. I'm hoping that means it wasn't worn much and therefore hadn't been used much.

Secondly, although it's down on amplitude, it's very steady. Currently about 1min a day fast, but it is always that. It's reliable, just wrong.

 

When it's it pieces and I'm completely lost, I'll give you a shout 😂😂😂. Kidding, I'm sure it will be fine.

Posted
1 hour ago, JohnL said:

You might also take care not to try drying the balance wheel and hairspring in front of a fan heater 😉

Noted 😂

I'm looking forward to doing it I like the watch more than I expected I would. I mean I liked it's or I wouldn't have bought it. But I'm liking it more and more.

Let me know what numbers you get out of it so I know what to aim at with mine.

Posted

Mine was a almost a complete non-runner. Couldn't be wound from the stem. Barely ticking when wound with a screwdriver (I think it's necessary to wind the ratchet wheels, and they're anti-clockwise so after a few turns will loosen the screw) Filthy, filthy dirty. Setting lever spring is broken, the yoke is almost worn completely through where it rests on the sliding clutch. Rotor and axle as loose as can be, a bent pinion on the centre second sweep etc. Dial face isn't great etc. Yet, for some reason, I want to get it running again. For the moment it's get the core running and keeping time, then decide whether to continue.

Pictures: Without calendar and day, Without automatic works and the yoke. 

_MG_6718_1000px.jpg

_MG_6743_1000px.jpg

_MG_6785_500px.jpg

Posted
17 hours ago, JohnL said:

_MG_6785_500px.jpg

Eek! I'm trying to imagine how many times a watch would need to be wound, and what kind of abrasive there must have been present, for the sliding clutch to wear that much of the yoke away.

Posted
17 minutes ago, GPrideaux said:

Eek! I'm trying to imagine how many times a watch would need to be wound, and what kind of abrasive there must have been present, for the sliding clutch to wear that much of the yoke away.

That's how it should look so it doesn't contact the clutch when winding.

Posted
1 hour ago, AndyGSi said:

That's how it should look so it doesn't contact the clutch when winding.

Really? I haven't worked on a Slava before, and the amount of black gunk that was around the keyless works, and everywhere else, the rust, the threads wrapped around the winding stem that made me think of someone knitting going: "knit one, pearl one, drop one", and everything else, made me convinced it had been worn. Or are you, if you'll pardon me, winding me up?

Posted
1 hour ago, JohnL said:

Really? I haven't worked on a Slava before, and the amount of black gunk that was around the keyless works, and everywhere else, the rust, the threads wrapped around the winding stem that made me think of someone knitting going: "knit one, pearl one, drop one", and everything else, made me convinced it had been worn. Or are you, if you'll pardon me, winding me up?

Presuming were talking about the 'missing' part in the photo below then
it maybe a little worn but from what I've seen, nothing out of the ordinary.

I've been trying to find a photo of a new part but will continue looking tonight.

image.png.2d981062c2f07f0ad0f767c683a4823a.png

Posted
2 hours ago, AndyGSi said:

I've been trying to find a photo of a new part but will continue looking tonight.

Don't do that. It's good to know that's not unusual. Thank you very much for even considering going to that effort. Extremely thoughtful and helpful of you, but not necessary at all. 

  • 3 months later...
Posted
On 1/29/2025 at 3:41 PM, graemeW said:

I won't need spring wonders hopefully, got new springs.

Sorry to bring this one up again: You mention you got new springs, dare I ask where? I haven't been able to find any but those for the manual version.

I cleaned and wound the mainsprings in my 2427 using a modified M6 washer and the crank from a winder, but they were a bit coned, have a bit of a kink in the spring where it meets the end of the bridle and the resultant amplitude is quite poor. 250, maybe a bit higher, on a full wind.

On 1/30/2025 at 11:42 AM, AndyGSi said:

That's how it should look so it doesn't contact the clutch when winding.

Confirmed that this is how the yoke should look when taking apart a 2428 for parts. I saw a post that you've left the forum. I hope that's not the case. You've helped me more than once and it was very much appreciated.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Moebius 9010. A small drop on each end cap jewel (top and bottom)…enough to cover at least half the jewel, but not all the way to the edge. I was conservative.   I like this analogy. And yes, it’s imperfect, because surgeons don’t start with live people. 😂 It’s definitely one of the things I learned with this watch, where I’d fix one issue, but then introduce 1-2 others, often not necessarily getting at the root cause of the “illness.” Well, this watch wasn’t totally destroyed…Unfortunately, I wasn’t able to do enough up-front diagnosis before I started pulling everything apart. This was one major lesson learned to me, but tbh, I don’t think I would have learned it had I not pulled everything apart and seen the interactions of all the different systems (just inside the balance assembly itself!). I have a few other Hamilton 974s that I’ll be able to work on more thoughtfully. I definitely heard your advice, and I think a few others echoed it, but I’m fairly certain I would have introduced more problems by attempting that fix. I don’t have the necessary skill or tools to (1) bend the cock and (2) assess exactly how much it has been bent. I can’t machine a brass plate to attach the cock while bending, I can’t measure the amount of deflection I’ve introduced. And it’s the kind of thing where botching it seemed like it would be irreversible. I’ll attempt to look at the hairspring to see if it’s touching anywhere. The central challenge is that I don’t have a reference point. I don’t have that for end shake or for anything else. I could compare to my ST36, but that seems like an apples-oranges comparison to me (new movement v. 100+ years old). That’s one of the main challenges for me when learning a lot of this stuff – you create reference points yourself! The next thing I was thinking of getting was a JKA Feintaster bench micrometer, tbh. After watching Alex Hamilton measure staffs and pivots, it seemed like it would be a good purchase. They’re just expensive. I’ll need to sell a watch or two first. 🙂  A lathe seems like something where I need to collect more experience before I pick one up. Perhaps you convince me otherwise.
    • Thanks for the reply Andy, I will take a look .
    • I don't think @praezis / Frank actually has a website. If you want his software message him and you'll get the info. I've used Witschi LCD and Vibrograf paper machines since last century, and it really is the best of both worlds. Picks up anything, however dirty (looking at you Witschi), with a readable result.   If you pay for the pro, it tells you exactly where the poise error is for dynamic poising, and it's damn accurate. I can't speak highly enough about this software. Some mics don't work, some do, you might have to solder something, but in all the above Frank can help with a solution. And it's unbelievably affordable.
    • Well, as I have said not once, for the beginners in watchmaking, the hairspring, especially when there is overcoil, is the source of the most of the problems. This is the case here too. The end shake... I told You to regulate it by bending the cock. If it was done, then would be no wondering if the shim is seated correctly every time. You still have to understand how much end shake is normal and correct. One exercise for this purpose:  remove the hairspring from balance. Put the balance in the movement with the cock. Use thin sharp pointed tweezers to grasp the balance staff  where the hairspring collet seats and try to move the staff up/down. The amount of movement should be more or less as much as in escape wheel or pallet fork arbor. In the same time You will see how easy the balance rotates when it is free and without hairspring. Moving the balance up/down by holding it by the rim is not the same, as it forces it to tilt and some shaking may be result of the radial free play of the pivots in the  bearings even if there is no endshake at all. Of course, You can grasp the roller too. You can also grasp the rim, but observe the staff movement, not the rim shake. One should be able to check and say if there is end shake and if it is normal without hesitation, no matter if the movements works well or not at all, and not to wonder if the reason for the not normal working is endshake. Now about the hairspring. You spring is touching somewhere. The fact that this slight lifting of the stud changed the situation proves it. The spring probably touches the arms of the balance, but You are the one that can look at the spring, so it is up to You only to find where it is touching. The spring should be parallel to the plane of balance and thus on equal distances from the cock  or from the balance arms in every position of the balance when it rotates. The coils of the spring must not touch each other. The overcoil also should be parallel and not touching the cock. The spring should not touch (be on some distance from) the regulator pins or the stud bottom. All this must be true also in DU position, not only in DD.  This is achieved by slight bending and twisting close to the stud  or of the overcoil.
×
×
  • Create New...