Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

My mum asked me to fix a vintage rotary she has come into... I fixed it by winding it! Seems to be keeping good time. 

 

Anyhow, wonder if anyone here knows anything about these? I'm guessing it's 1950's? Is there a site out there that helps ID old Rotary watches? Got a feelin this might be 9ct gold - didn't have the magnification to read the hallmark but there is one and it appears to have 75 among the three digits. 

 

Any ideas on what it is exactly and/or value? Thanks.IMG_20241226_184440.thumb.jpg.1997e3e95cfe811e90c493bcc21f0b2b.jpgIMG_20241226_184432.thumb.jpg.6611f9c3f0a919835c3f83a229223386.jpgIMG_20241226_184151.thumb.jpg.852345eaa587e9c45c8e8a820e4e7e44.jpg

Posted
22 minutes ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

375...37.5% gold or 9ct

Value will be little more than its gold scrap value. Is the bracelet gold as well ? 

I think so, or rather that's where the hallmark I've seen is - there might be another inside the caseback. 

  • Like 1
Posted
33 minutes ago, AndyGSi said:

Need more info on the movement and hallmarks but could be earlier than 1950 due to lack of the wings.

Yeah, I'm only going on pictures so far but think maybe 30s... If I find out I'll update.

I've left it with my mum since she's going to wear and see how it's keeping time - it's one of those where I won't open it unless I need to. 

Posted
Just now, tIB said:

I think so, or rather that's where the hallmark I've seen is - there might be another inside the caseback. 

Each separate piece of gold will have its own hallmark. A guess of 10g of 9ct gold at around £20 per gram will give you 200ish quid.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

Each separate piece of gold will have its own hallmark. A guess of 10g of 9ct gold at around £20 per gram will give you 200ish quid.

Cheers - it's a nice sentimental piece for her so I'm hoping it's just working ok and if not whether she should invest in a service on it. If it was worth a lot I doubt my mum would wear it so it's good it's not desirable or something. 

 

Thanks for the help all.

Posted
2 minutes ago, tIB said:

Yeah, I'm only going on pictures so far but think maybe 30s... If I find out I'll update.

I've left it with my mum since she's going to wear and see how it's keeping time - it's one of those where I won't open it unless I need to. 

The dial and hands look more 60s 

3 minutes ago, tIB said:

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
44 minutes ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

 

9 minutes ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

The dial and hands look more 60s 

 

Ah interesting, thanks - I'd assumed older though I was only going on the typeface/logo. 

Posted
10 hours ago, tIB said:

Ah interesting, thanks - I'd assumed older though I was only going on the typeface/logo. 

There are always exceptions, but this simple style and colour of dial together with matching pencil hands is very common with 1960s watches. I'd have expected an older ladies watch to be smaller as well.

If you can locate the town assaying and date letter hallmark stamps then we can get an accurate date. Probably on the inside of the caseback.

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

There are always exceptions, but this simple style and colour of dial together with matching pencil hands is very common with 1960s watches. I'd have expected an older ladies watch to be smaller as well.

If you can locate the town assaying and date letter hallmark stamps then we can get an accurate date. Probably on the inside of the caseback.

Thanks for the info - I'll pop it open next time my mum is over. Meanwhile it's kept running over night and is keeping good time so I'm hoping it's something she can wear and enjoy; as well as having sentimental value it's quite a nice little watch. Result!

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, tIB said:

Thanks for the info - I'll pop it open next time my mum is over. Meanwhile it's kept running over night and is keeping good time so I'm hoping it's something she can wear and enjoy; as well as having sentimental value it's quite a nice little watch. Result!

If mum is happy then thats always a result, much easier than keeping wifey happy 😅

  • Haha 1
Posted

It's another watch - wife would not be happy!

1 minute ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

If mum is happy then thats always a result, much easier than keeping wifey happy 😅

 

Posted
2 minutes ago, tIB said:

It's another watch - wife would not be happy!

 

Three helpful hints...1 always do as she asks of you...2 never answer back...3 have your credit card ready to hand over as she is putting on her coat to go out shopping. 🙂

  • Haha 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello all, just disassembling to service, but I can’t figure out the working of the calendar work…it’s not operational the jumper and spring are ok, but the operation of the driving wheel has me at a loss. I can’t see a cam to drive anything. Is something damaged or missing? Help please!
    • Believe the relume (not a fan) was done a long time after the damage. 
    • I can only think of some chemical reaction to reluming
    • I have a little milling attachment for my WW lathe, but very rarely use it and not for wheel and pinion cutting. For that I use a small Sixis 101 milling machine. I normally do direct dividing, but sometimes have to do an odd count and use the universal index which also fits on the Sixis.   Back in the day when I didn't have a mill, I would cut gearing on my Schaublin 102. It has a universal dividing attachment which fits the back of the spindle. Both it and the one for the Sixis are 60:1 ratio, and with the set of 4  index plates I can do almost any division. When I've had to do a strange high count prime number, I print a disc with the needed division and just place the plunger on the dot. Any position error is reduced by a factor of 60 so still plenty accurate.   The machines are a mess in the pics as I'm in the process of making a batch of barrels for a wristwatch 🙃.   This is the Sixis. The head can also be placed vertically, as can the dividing spindle.   Dividing plates. The smaller ones fit another dividing spindle.   Universal divider for the Sixis. I put it together with parts from an odd Sixis spindle that takes w20 collets, like the Schaublin 102, and a dividing attachment from a Schaublin mill.     The dividing attachment for the 102. The gear fits in place of the handwheel at the back of the headstock.   And the little milling attachment for the WW lathe. I just set it on the slide rest to illustrate the size, you can see from the dust on it it really doesn't get used much. I think only when I change bearing in the head, to kiss the collet head seat (grinding wheel still in the milling attachment).
    • I read a lot about the quality (or lack thereof) of Seiko's 4R, 6R, 8L  movements...or more specifically the lack of regulation from the factory. Especially when compared to similar priced manufactures using SW200's or ETA's. I thought I'd ask those more in the know, do the 4R's and 6R's deserve their bad reputation, is it fairly easy for someone with minimal skills (or better yet a trained watch mechanic) to dial in these movements to a more acceptable performance.    For background I spent more on a 1861 Speedy years ago, expecting that the advertised 0-15s/d  would probably perform more like 5-7s/d. In reality it's been closed to 2-4s/d. 
×
×
  • Create New...