Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

 I’ve attached a few photos of a watch I recently purchased, which I know has an ebauche made by Fountainemelon because I found their stamp. I’ve looked at photos of every Fountainemelon movement I can find, but none of them match. There is an inscription on the back indicating that it was a gift in memory of the “Guerre 1916/17" and the earliest repair mark I can find is from 1917, so I’m assuming it's from about that date. The unusual thing about this trench watch is that it has a date hand function, which seems to have been fairly rare, at least this early.  I have found that a Swiss watchmaker named Alfred Hammerly patented a date hand mechanism in 1915, but so far can find nothing about him, his patent, or early examples employing his ideas. I’ve attached a couple of photos, one of the date mechanism and one of the watch face.

   It also seems slightly unusual in that it has 13 jewels, since the 3rd and 4th wheels only have jewels on the mechanism side, but not the dial side. I assume this is because the jewel settings would sit too high on the plate and interfere with wheel that advances the date. I’ve also read that some of the early date-hand watches had to have the date set every day, but this one advances the date. It also has a pusher at about 11:30 that stops the date hand from advancing while setting the time.

   It appears that Oris was one of the first makers to supply a wristwatch with a date hand, but not until the 1930’s. Since the date hand is sometimes mentioned as the first wrist watch complication I’m thinking that this watch might be somewhat rare, and I would be immensely grateful if you can shed any light on what it might be, or if you have any conjectures.

13 copy.jpg

DSC_5664 copy 2.jpg

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello all, just disassembling to service, but I can’t figure out the working of the calendar work…it’s not operational the jumper and spring are ok, but the operation of the driving wheel has me at a loss. I can’t see a cam to drive anything. Is something damaged or missing? Help please!
    • Believe the relume (not a fan) was done a long time after the damage. 
    • I can only think of some chemical reaction to reluming
    • I have a little milling attachment for my WW lathe, but very rarely use it and not for wheel and pinion cutting. For that I use a small Sixis 101 milling machine. I normally do direct dividing, but sometimes have to do an odd count and use the universal index which also fits on the Sixis.   Back in the day when I didn't have a mill, I would cut gearing on my Schaublin 102. It has a universal dividing attachment which fits the back of the spindle. Both it and the one for the Sixis are 60:1 ratio, and with the set of 4  index plates I can do almost any division. When I've had to do a strange high count prime number, I print a disc with the needed division and just place the plunger on the dot. Any position error is reduced by a factor of 60 so still plenty accurate.   The machines are a mess in the pics as I'm in the process of making a batch of barrels for a wristwatch 🙃.   This is the Sixis. The head can also be placed vertically, as can the dividing spindle.   Dividing plates. The smaller ones fit another dividing spindle.   Universal divider for the Sixis. I put it together with parts from an odd Sixis spindle that takes w20 collets, like the Schaublin 102, and a dividing attachment from a Schaublin mill.     The dividing attachment for the 102. The gear fits in place of the handwheel at the back of the headstock.   And the little milling attachment for the WW lathe. I just set it on the slide rest to illustrate the size, you can see from the dust on it it really doesn't get used much. I think only when I change bearing in the head, to kiss the collet head seat (grinding wheel still in the milling attachment).
    • I read a lot about the quality (or lack thereof) of Seiko's 4R, 6R, 8L  movements...or more specifically the lack of regulation from the factory. Especially when compared to similar priced manufactures using SW200's or ETA's. I thought I'd ask those more in the know, do the 4R's and 6R's deserve their bad reputation, is it fairly easy for someone with minimal skills (or better yet a trained watch mechanic) to dial in these movements to a more acceptable performance.    For background I spent more on a 1861 Speedy years ago, expecting that the advertised 0-15s/d  would probably perform more like 5-7s/d. In reality it's been closed to 2-4s/d. 
×
×
  • Create New...