Jump to content

Making faceplate, question about clamps

caseback
 Share

Recommended Posts

caseback WRT Addict

caseback

Posted
Posted (edited)

As "factory" faceplates are ridiculously expensive these days, I decided to make one myself. I have the plate on the watchmakers lathe now and there's no runout, so now it's time to make some clamps. My question is this: I have seen several designs. They all have a seperate setting screw between top and bottom part to tilt the upper part. They differ however on the way the upper and lower parts are clamped. Some have a seperate screw for fixing the bottom part and another for tightening the upper part. Others have 1 single screw for tightening both the upper and lower part in one go. Are there any pro's and cons you guys are aware of?

 

20241206_151117.jpg

20241206_180809.jpg

20241221_145948.jpg

20241222_112732.jpg

20241223_162331.jpg

Edited by caseback
  • Like 3
nickelsilver Distinguished Member

nickelsilver

Posted
Posted (edited)

Have you looked at the machining involved with the clamps? Have you looked at enough to see there's a general theme? These old guys weren't dumb. That the flat part where the part registers is within fractions of a hundredth of a mm in height? The plate is (relatively) simple, if you have a lathe that can face straight over 100mm. But the clamps? Yeah 3d print them and kind of do ok work and wonder what all the fuss was when folks made stuff out of metal. But Hardinge and Levin and Derbyshire and Lorch and Boley and Boley Leinen and a dozen more knew what they were doing, and even at current Ebay prices are worth every penny.

 

If you want to machine the clamps out of (any) metal, obviously time is of no essence, and so you can do them correctly, using granité plates to verify their trueness, even hand scraping to get them true.

My advice, if you want to actually use a faceplate, is find a Hardinge or Levin and buy it and start faceplating. If you just want to make one then knock yourself out.

Edited by nickelsilver
  • Like 2
caseback WRT Addict

caseback

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 hour ago, nickelsilver said:

Have you looked at the machining involved with the clamps?

Thnx for the warning, but yes I have.

I don't "need" a faceplate at the moment, but earlier I already had a project where it would have been nice to actually have one. So this seems like a nice project. This is strictly a hobby for me and I like (love!) making and fixing stuff and bringing home stray machines that I can fix/improve. My wife eventually stopped asking me what I will be using any "new" bit of machinery for, because the usual answer is "I don't know yet. Probably making more tools" 😉. 

The clamps will probably be machined from ground flat stock to skip some steps, but I could use coarser stock as well as I have the tools needed to do the grinding myself (surface grinder, granite plate)🙃.

What clamp type does you faceplate have (1 or 2 screws?). Have you used the other type as well? Do you have any preferences?

  • Like 3
nickelsilver Distinguished Member

nickelsilver

Posted
Posted (edited)
9 hours ago, caseback said:

What clamp type does you faceplate have (1 or 2 screws?). Have you used the other type as well? Do you have any preferences?

All the clamps I have used have been a variation of some sort of this one in the photo (two clamps there, one assembled one apart). The jack screw is to allow the clamp to contact the part parallel, which increases the clamping area and also reduces the chance of dinging the part. 

 

I do do quite a lot of faceplate work, and many years ago figured out that I prefer the setup in the third pic. The part is glued to a brass support (second pic), which is centered on the plate optically and held with simple clamps. I can glue and unglue newly made and delicately finished parts with no damage, and also handy for small or odd parts (I think that's a LeCoultre 409 mainplate on the support).

 

 

20241224_134205.jpg

 

 

20241224_135108.jpg

IMG_0036.JPG

Edited by nickelsilver
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Neverenoughwatches Distinguished Member

Neverenoughwatches

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, nickelsilver said:

All the clamps I have used have been a variation of some sort of this one in the photo (two clamps there, one assembled one apart). The jack screw is to allow the clamp to contact the part parallel, which increases the clamping area and also reduces the chance of dinging the part. 

 

I do do quite a lot of faceplate work, and many years ago figured out that I prefer the setup in the third pic. The part is glued to a brass support (second pic), which is centered on the plate optically and held with simple clamps. I can glue and unglue newly made and delicately finished parts with no damage, and also handy for small or odd parts (I think that's a LeCoultre 409 mainplate on the support).

 

 

20241224_134205.jpg

 

 

20241224_135108.jpg

IMG_0036.JPG

Is there an advantage with this set-up compared to just a big brass wax chuck ?

nickelsilver Distinguished Member

nickelsilver

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

Is there an advantage with this set-up compared to just a big brass wax chuck ?

Well, it's essentially a big-ass (haha) wax chuck. The advantage is being able to glue parts on conveniently; I use super glue (Loctite 480), then the brass block goes in acetone and a few minutes later the part is off and clean. Since I knock around the block to get it true on the faceplate the part is never at risk.

 

I used to do a perpetual calendar where every hole for a jewel in every bridge got "uprighted" in the faceplate. 11 on the movement side, about that many on the dial side. Mainplate I would screw down to a similar brass block that was purpose-made (I did a lot of these); I could do all the holes in a couple of hours.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
caseback WRT Addict

caseback

Posted
  • Author
Posted
30 minutes ago, nickelsilver said:

Well, it's essentially a big-ass (haha) wax chuck.

I imagine the grid-pattern on these help with both hardening and softening the glue. Did you put it there yourself (if so: how?) or is it a ready bought product?

nickelsilver Distinguished Member

nickelsilver

Posted
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, caseback said:

I imagine the grid-pattern on these help with both hardening and softening the glue. Did you put it there yourself (if so: how?) or is it a ready bought product?

Yes to both, and most importantly the part glues super flat. The grooves are done with a checkering file, and the top of the block gets a skim cut on the faceplate so the surface is really parallel to the bottom. Part sits on the block, drop of glue on a piece of brass or whatever, then I pick up and feed some in with an oiler here and there around the part. It wicks in to the grooves, which also provide "tooth" for holding.

 

For something with a decent amount of surface area, putting glue on that surface then the part onto a smooth holder can result in significant out-of-flat (hydraulics).

Edited by nickelsilver
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • 3 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tonydagee
      Calendar work certina 25-651

      By tonydagee · Posted

      Hello all, just disassembling to service, but I can’t figure out the working of the calendar work…it’s not operational the jumper and spring are ok, but the operation of the driving wheel has me at a loss. I can’t see a cam to drive anything. Is something damaged or missing? Help please!
    • tIB
      Unusual Seiko dial damage

      By tIB · Posted

      Believe the relume (not a fan) was done a long time after the damage. 
    • Malocchio
      Unusual Seiko dial damage

      By Malocchio · Posted

      I can only think of some chemical reaction to reluming
    • nickelsilver
      A lathe with indexing that won't break the bank?

      By nickelsilver · Posted

      I have a little milling attachment for my WW lathe, but very rarely use it and not for wheel and pinion cutting. For that I use a small Sixis 101 milling machine. I normally do direct dividing, but sometimes have to do an odd count and use the universal index which also fits on the Sixis.   Back in the day when I didn't have a mill, I would cut gearing on my Schaublin 102. It has a universal dividing attachment which fits the back of the spindle. Both it and the one for the Sixis are 60:1 ratio, and with the set of 4  index plates I can do almost any division. When I've had to do a strange high count prime number, I print a disc with the needed division and just place the plunger on the dot. Any position error is reduced by a factor of 60 so still plenty accurate.   The machines are a mess in the pics as I'm in the process of making a batch of barrels for a wristwatch 🙃.   This is the Sixis. The head can also be placed vertically, as can the dividing spindle.   Dividing plates. The smaller ones fit another dividing spindle.   Universal divider for the Sixis. I put it together with parts from an odd Sixis spindle that takes w20 collets, like the Schaublin 102, and a dividing attachment from a Schaublin mill.     The dividing attachment for the 102. The gear fits in place of the handwheel at the back of the headstock.   And the little milling attachment for the WW lathe. I just set it on the slide rest to illustrate the size, you can see from the dust on it it really doesn't get used much. I think only when I change bearing in the head, to kiss the collet head seat (grinding wheel still in the milling attachment).
    • SidKop
      Opinions on Seiko's 4R and 6R movement quality from those more able to judge

      By SidKop · Posted

      I read a lot about the quality (or lack thereof) of Seiko's 4R, 6R, 8L  movements...or more specifically the lack of regulation from the factory. Especially when compared to similar priced manufactures using SW200's or ETA's. I thought I'd ask those more in the know, do the 4R's and 6R's deserve their bad reputation, is it fairly easy for someone with minimal skills (or better yet a trained watch mechanic) to dial in these movements to a more acceptable performance.    For background I spent more on a 1861 Speedy years ago, expecting that the advertised 0-15s/d  would probably perform more like 5-7s/d. In reality it's been closed to 2-4s/d. 
×
×
  • Create New...