Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi need help in were to sauce a stem for a old Rolex rolco do not know parts number as watch not arrived or how I would measure and work out thread size to make one

Posted

We need to identify the movement to help you, but the oldest of these Rolco watches use Aegler-Rebberg movements that lack a calibre number and are very difficult to identify.

You may end up having to make or modify a stem to fit .

Post pictures of both sides of the movement when you have it and the size of the movement and hopefully it’s one that has a calibre number. 

Gruen used a lot of the same Aegler movements at the time and it’s worth comparing your movement with those if you can’t find it labeled as an Aegler or Rolex/Rolco calibre.

Best Regards,

Mark

 

  • Like 1
Posted
18 minutes ago, Mercurial said:

We need to identify the movement to help you, but the oldest of these Rolco watches use Aegler-Rebberg movements that lack a calibre number and are very difficult to identify.

As far as i know there were only two rebberg designs, i have an image somewhere. 

Posted (edited)
19 hours ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

As far as i know there were only two rebberg designs, i have an image somewhere. 

I wish that was the case.

The Aegler movements used in the early days by Wilsdorf & Davis (for brands like Rolex and Rolco) came in several sizes and without designated calibre numbers that survive. 

They become a bit easier to identify during the 1920s.

Below is an Aegler-Rebberg, 25.74mm in diameter. It’s from a woman’s Rolex wristwatch.

Stamped Rebberg and 500 on the dial plate (but it isn’t a Rebberg 500, it’s the wrong size). 

I’d be interested if anyone can identify the movement. 

908CA2F9-A971-4FB0-97DC-97FBEB05BE50.thumb.jpeg.ec80f2a7e135f7977491f381612bff6c.jpegED1A181F-117D-4AD0-AC14-BFBB14AAB53C.thumb.jpeg.a481fd36a5bbfe1dc81101ae50fc8004.jpeg

249F4B90-8852-4BE1-A809-440C7C4AC2B0.thumb.jpeg.58b829fbae3a4e53f2ab3c8e153a4396.jpeg

It is based off the Aegler Nr.1, circa 1903, but they based many many calibres of different sizes on it.

The closest I have to a positive ID is the  ‘Rolex Nr.50’ circa 1917, but no dial side images or movement sizes are available in the references. There are identical looking movements in many sizes. 

The 25.74mm of this movement is a particularly strange size for the era, it equates to 11.41 lignes. 
 

A50419D1-FD18-4D3E-89E5-892CC3A8DB23.jpeg.d49284f6f025c3e7354f032a7f28a9d0.jpeg
 

Best Regards,

Mark

Edited by Mercurial
  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Mercurial said:

I wish that was the case.

The Aegler movements used in the early days by Wilsdorf & Davis (for brands like Rolex and Rolco) came in several sizes and without designated calibre numbers that survive. 

They become a bit easier to identify during the 1920s.

Below is an Aegler-Rebberg, 25.74mm in diameter. It’s from a woman’s Rolex wristwatch.

Stamped Rebberg and 500 on the dial plate (but it isn’t a Rebberg 500, it’s the wrong size). 

I’d be interested if anyone can identify the movement. 

908CA2F9-A971-4FB0-97DC-97FBEB05BE50.thumb.jpeg.ec80f2a7e135f7977491f381612bff6c.jpegED1A181F-117D-4AD0-AC14-BFBB14AAB53C.thumb.jpeg.a481fd36a5bbfe1dc81101ae50fc8004.jpeg

249F4B90-8852-4BE1-A809-440C7C4AC2B0.thumb.jpeg.58b829fbae3a4e53f2ab3c8e153a4396.jpeg

It is based off the Aegler Nr.1, circa 1903, but they based many many calibres of different sizes on it.

The closest I have to a positive ID is the  ‘Rolex Nr.50’ circa 1917, but no dial side images or movement sizes are available in the references. There are identical looking movements in many sizes. 

The 25.74mm of this movement is a particularly strange size for the era, it equates to 11.41 lignes. 
 

A50419D1-FD18-4D3E-89E5-892CC3A8DB23.jpeg.d49284f6f025c3e7354f032a7f28a9d0.jpeg
 

Best Regards,

Mark

Thats interesting Mark, from something i read six months ago there were only two actual Rebberg labled movements. I have one if them in my stash, I'll dig it out later today. Inspired me to research some more now.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Mercurial said:

Here are 4 to get you started. 
 

Nr. 1 and Nr. 2, registered in 1903. 
8D9940AF-CCDA-4A6B-98F1-292F9BDA9508.thumb.jpeg.3ab477991d4da1e8a5f43007d752c2b0.jpeg

Nr. 52 and Nr. 53, registered in 1918. 
9BA578B9-B0E3-4551-AE57-BEEF5CC26BB3.thumb.jpeg.e58877b2a982abf6e295789cba8734e1.jpeg

Best Regards,

Mark 

Thats the same artical i read Mark, suggesting that 2 models were registered in 1918 and marked as Rebberg Dèposè on the movementa these two are usually known as the Aegler Rebberg. A little misleading but yes seems like there were more Rebberg calibers.

https://www.vintagewatchstraps.com/aegler.php#:~:text=The word Rebberg%2C the German,the Swiss register of trademarks.

  • Like 1
Posted

I recognised it (or thought I did) - it's virtually the mirror image of a Rolex Rebberg 600 I restored for a friend!

https://ranfft.org/caliber/9371-Rolex-600

 

It's easy to find photos of watches with the same movement you have - just search 1915 or 1920 Rebberg - but none of the watch listings I've found so far gives the calibre, unfortunately.

 

For a stem, I'd try a pack of mixed ones; try and find a suitable on to fit the sliding clutch, that you can then measure, and use them to gauge the diameter at the setting lever - or if you are lucky, there may be one that just works.

eg.

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/201125197829

 

Posted (edited)


rjenkinsgb - these movements were made in many sizes.

The only way to definitely identify say a Rolex Rebberg 600 is to measure it. 

Best Regards,

Mark

Edited by Mercurial
fix typos

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Where I work everything incoming watches whatever detailed descriptions are taken entered into a computer program and photograph of each item. Then ideally although it depends on who's doing the paperwork detailed descriptions can be quite good other times there lacking. Like I really like it with pocket watches if they would record the serial number it avoids confusion later on. Then when watch repairs are completed that is also entered in. It's one of the amusements I learned when I was in school instructor had a shop and commented about the important aspect of keeping detailed records of repairs. Because oftentimes a customer who got a new crystal will come back later on when the watch doesn't work and expect you to fix the entire watch for free. Then you can remind them that they just got a crystal. Strangely enough that keeps coming up or occasionally comes up where I work now. One of the problems of using the service marks on the case is that in the case of pocket watches oftentimes that's not the original case. Then case marks? What I was doing warranty work for a company I used to describe a code number in the back of the case and it would tell me the next time I see the watch that basically what I did I made no attempt at keeping track of customers because we had literally thousands of them I think they sold 30,000 of these watches and they would come back by the hundreds because they had a lifetime warranty. Yes that's a story all of itself but I would put a code number that would reference what was done to the watch the last time and think I had a date in there somehow so it did tell a story if you knew the code. Another shop I once worked out the number would reference the page in the book. So other than knowing we had been in there you would have no idea what happened because you have to go look at the page in the book to see what happened. Then the problem of how you examine a watch you should examine the watch in detail every single time to avoid complications. Although on vintage watches and this is a of amusement I have at work when people ask something and I say of the watches done when it leaves. This is because on vintage oftentimes problems won't show up until the watches much farther into the repair like it's now running and you discover things that you can't discover before because it wasn't running to discover them that also become sometimes difficult to have exact rigid prices are estimates of repairs or in the case of a pocket watch you may not find out if a casing problem to later on when you case it up in the watches running. I was just thinking for all those people that would like to leave a mark maybe you should learn to do what some of the past watchmakers did? Leave a mark but leave it in such a way that no one will ever find it? Typically not done for repair purposes but done for other reasons like identifying it's legit. I have a friend with a Gruen watch and one of the Roman numbers the bottom line that just looks like a line under extreme magnification actually says Gruen watch company or something equivalent. So here's a link showing how to mark your watch without being seen although that's not the actual title. So if you can learn micro engraving you can engrave the watch someplace probably just about any place you just have to remember where you put it. https://cnaluxury.channelnewsasia.com/obsessions/how-to-prove-if-watches-are-authentic-secret-signatures-182516  
    • I have acquired a Citizen Leopard 36000 watch. My reason for purchasing it was my desire to own a timepiece with a 36,000 BPH movement, and the price was reasonable. Another motivating factor was gaining hands-on experience with the mechanism. The watch is in good condition, but I intend to fully disassemble it for maintenance. First and foremost, if anyone has prior experience with this particular model, I would greatly appreciate their insights. I do not have access to Citizen’s specialized lubricants and will need to use the ones available to me, such as 9010, 8000, and 8300 grease. Additionally, I do not possess the appropriate oil for the pallet jewels and will only be able to clean them.
    • Hello all, I am working on an older Valjoux Chrono. It doesn't have a stamp on the movement anywhere but I believe it is a Valjoux 72. I installed the train of wheels and they will not turn. The problem appears to be the 4th wheel and the escape wheel are not interfacing correctly. I had to replace both of these parts as the pivots were broken on each. I sourced genuine Valjoux/ETA replacements. I think the problem is with the escape wheel as all the wheels turn perfectly if I remove just the escape wheel.  My question to those with more Valjoux experience is am I mistaken? Is this some other model altogether and I have the wrong part or parts?    
    • I would remove the wheels, check for damage and if not damaged, clean. 
    • Thanks for the replies! Here's a photo of the front of the clock and a GIF animation of the movement (exposed by removing the black cap in the centre of the clock). You can see the behaviour of the gears. It's a fairly valuable clock from the 80s (Braun ABW 35). I'm not sure if replacing the movement would diminish the value, so I'd prefer to keep the original parts if it's easy to fix. But since the movement itself is pretty generic, I guess, maybe replacing it wouldn't make any difference with regard to the value of the clock? Or would it? I suppose the value is mostly in the design.
×
×
  • Create New...