Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

What remains of the screws is fused to studs in the case back...

IMG_0909.thumb.jpeg.c028a57b70339d56ee9bb403ed8dbda2.jpeg

The movement floats inside the case without them making it very difficult to operate the back winder. 

IMG_0911.thumb.jpeg.5f02ac0bbf3027b7d7b0bad4cd9316d3.jpeg

Could I try tapping the studs? If that didn't work I think if there were a bit of a post that protruded into the plate it would help a great deal, too...

 

Edited by rehajm
Posted

I'm not quite sure above your picture? in other words the case back says that 18 karat gold is there any other steel on that case back other than the screws themselves? Because if you only have steel screws you should be able to dissolve them out with alum. Typically you do this with a brass plates were your broker screw off as long as there's no other steel or iron that you would like to keep you could just dissolve them out versus drilling them

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)

Thanks John- Alum powder would seem a good candidate but the fused screws and the design of the ‘case band’ and ‘studs’ makes me think they could be steel. I see no exposed brass but steel would make sense to me as the case band supports the plate and is supposed to take the pull/push pressure of the back winder…given that I thought alum is risky...

I’m also wondering if something could be wedged into the area where the screw head is? With the case snapped shut it might prevent the movement from sliding..

Edited by rehajm
Posted

I was rereading of the image text and yes it's? It's not real clear what some of the components are and if it was just the screws stuck in the gold back that would be fine but it looks like probably that's not what it is

 

Posted

I'm contemplating the alum route, the case screws are around so if the others were dissolved problem solved...but chemistry was not my thing. How would I identify the composition of the retaining ring/studs and what could it do to the case back finish if anything?

Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, RichardHarris123 said:

I'm assuming the studs are steel, gold is too soft for threading.  I'm confused by the hole in the case back. 

Yes- the ring and studs are the support structure for sure…

…the case back hole is for the stem/crown. It’s a back wind like this…

IMG_0924.thumb.jpeg.891863f56af49aafa21978a45745ea23.jpeg

up front in the photo is where the case screw attaches to the plate

Edited by rehajm
Posted
3 hours ago, RichardHarris123 said:

I'm confused

restricting my normal confusions to just this discussion I'm confused also as the image just isn't revealing enough. 18 karat gold is too soft for typically anything. than the problem with cold case screws is they do use them but the slots usually get messed up and a real pain to get them in and out without damage.

Is looking at the picture and it's hard to tell how this all goes together. But from the description it looks like the stud is pressed into the back and the screws somehow threads into that and then threads into the movement told the whole thing together.

then when I think about this I bet you have those are not hiring screws there probably stainless steel. Who knows what the stud is made out of it might be iron or steel. The problem is I don't think alum will dissolve stainless steel. It only typically dissolves iron alloy's which is why it shouldn't touch the gold but it probably wouldn't touch stainless steel in either. Then because the studs are pressed in I'm assuming they're not considered a casing component and you would have to make something

http://cgi.julesborel.com/cgi-bin/matcgi2?ref=OME_640

 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

restricting my normal confusions to just this discussion I'm confused also as the image just isn't revealing enough. 18 karat gold is too soft for typically anything. than the problem with cold case screws is they do use them but the slots usually get messed up and a real pain to get them in and out without damage.

Is looking at the picture and it's hard to tell how this all goes together. But from the description it looks like the stud is pressed into the back and the screws somehow threads into that and then threads into the movement told the whole thing together.

then when I think about this I bet you have those are not hiring screws there probably stainless steel. Who knows what the stud is made out of it might be iron or steel. The problem is I don't think alum will dissolve stainless steel. It only typically dissolves iron alloy's which is why it shouldn't touch the gold but it probably wouldn't touch stainless steel in either. Then because the studs are pressed in I'm assuming they're not considered a casing component and you would have to make something

http://cgi.julesborel.com/cgi-bin/matcgi2?ref=OME_640

 

Thanks John and sorry it isn’t clear from the photos 

IMG_0925.jpeg.2637d87ad0297bbb4db07d1eae2a3528.jpeg

My poor attempt at a blue arrow highlights the area called ‘blue countersink’ from the service illustration. Basically the movement is screwed down with the broken screws in question then the case snaps into the front part of the watch with integrated strap. Here…like this

IMG_0922.thumb.jpeg.d9473b52be00cccd6a964ba8bc0c843f.jpeg

so when the movement isn’t attached to the case back it floats inside the case and is difficult to wind and set because you have to pull the set wheel/ crown to set. When the winder has to be pushed back in the movement moves until it contacts the crystal…so the dial will wear and sometimes the stem doesn’t push back in so it won’t wind…

Edited by rehajm

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hi, this is the first place I found when looking for advice so I hope someone could advise me.  Im completely new to touching watches but I’ve always wondered how they work.  I’ve bought a cheap movement, an ETA replica to take apart and rebuild.  Im thinking I’ll need some screwdrivers, tweezers, movement holder and a loop? My goal is just to have a go first and see if I enjoy it enough before buying more tools.  Do I buy cheap tools for now and get better quality tools later if I enjoy it like I think I will? or will the cheap tools be a pain and take some of the fun out of it?  With quality tools being relatively expensive I’m unsure what to buy.    Any advice would be greatly appreciated!
    • Yeah I have seen 44-56 documented for Elgin 18 size elsewhere. I have the style of gauge that's like a set of feeler gauges and I never noticed before today it is faintly stamped "Elgin". Pictured is the way I have been measuring. I am going to go to a larger jewel than the 42 that had been in there. I recently won an auction on a big set of Fitrite jewels all in the little bottles, to discover that the what's actually in the bottles bears no relation to the chart of sizes printed on the box. In most cases it seems to be all mixed so in fact I have about 24 little bottles and thousands of assorted jewels of all diameters and lengths, which is better than nothing. But since I don't have a micrometer with a table, measuring for the exact diameter will be a big job. Instead I will test a lot of them in the fork slot the same way I measure with the gauge. But this is still the next thing. I have to get the escapement to unlock first.
    • it would be nice to have the exact model of the watch the or a picture so we can see exactly what you're talking about. this is because the definition of Swiss watch could be a variety of things and it be helpful if we could see exactly the watch your dealing with then in professional watch repair at least some professionals they do pre-cleaned watches. In other words the hands and dial come off and the entire movement assembled goes through a cleaning machine sometimes I think a shorter bath perhaps so everything is nice and clean for disassembly makes it easier to look for problems. Then other professionals don't like pre-cleaning because it basically obliterates the scene of the crime. Especially when dealing with vintage watches where you're looking for metal filings and problems that may visually go away with cleaning. Then usually super sticky lubrication isn't really a problem for disassembly and typically shouldn't be a problem on a pallet fork bridge because there shouldn't be any lubrication on the bridge at all as you typically do not oil the pallet fork pivots.  
    • A few things you should find out before you can mske a decision of what to do. As Richard said, what is the crown and all of the crown components made of . Then also the stem .  The crown looks to have a steel washer that retains a gasket. So be careful with what chemicals you use to dissolve any stem adhesives or the use of heat. You might swell or melt the gasket unless you are prepared to change that also . The steel washer maybe reactive to alum. Something I've just used to dissolve a broken screw from a plate. First drilled out the centre of the screw with a 0.5mm carbide . Dipped only the section that held the broken screw in Rustins rust remover. This is 40 % phosphoric acid. 3 days and the screw remains were completely dissolved, no trace of steel in the brass threads. A black puddle left in the solution.
    • I suppose this will add to the confusion I have a roller jewel assortment. It lists out American pocket watches for Elgin 18 size and even 16 size it's a 50. But not all the various companies used 50-50 does seem to be common one company had a 51 and the smallest is 43. American parts are always interesting? Francis Elgin for mainsprings will tell you the thickness of the spring other companies will not even though the spring for the same number could come in a variety of thicknesses. But if we actually had the model number of your watch we would find it probably makes a reference that the roller jewel came in different dimensions. So overlook the parts book we find that? So it appears to be 18 and 16 size would be the same sort of the arson different catalog numbers and as I said we don't have your Mongol know which Log number were supposed to be using. Variety of materials garnered her sapphire single or double but zero mention about diameters. Then in a section of rollers in this case rollers with jewels we do get this down in the notes section Roller specifications but of course zero reference to the jewel size. I was really hoping the roller jewel assortment would give us sizes it doesn't really. But it does show a picture of how one particular roller jewel gauge is used  
×
×
  • Create New...