Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm currently working on an eBay find (Raymond Weil 2875-ST-00658) with an ETA 2895-2 movement. I stripped it, cleaned it, got it back together with pretty good numbers ( -2 s/d, 260° and a beat error between 0.1 and 0.0). I gave it what I thought was a good wind and let it run for 24 hours. Still running the first day but when I went to wind it again it felt like something was slipping -- that feeling you get manually winding an automatic even when it's fully wound. The watch stopped 10 hours later. When I wound it wouldn't hold much of a wind at all, maybe running for five minutes before it stopped. The thing that looks odd to me is on the barrel arbor there is a space or gap between the squared section where the ratchet wheel sits and the thicker part that is in the barrel. I almost think the ratchet wheel is slipping in that gap. I also checked the ETA technical sheet for the 289x series and the arbor diagrams don't really show any kind of gap or space there. What do you thnk?

arbor1.jpg

arbor2.jpg

arbor3.jpg

arbor-barrel1.jpg

arbor-ratchet-barrel1.jpg

arbor-ratchet-barrel2.jpg

barrel1.jpg

barrel-and-ratchet.jpg

Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, eccentric59 said:

I'm currently working on an eBay find (Raymond Weil 2875-ST-00658) with an ETA 2895-2 movement. I stripped it, cleaned it, got it back together with pretty good numbers ( -2 s/d, 260° and a beat error between 0.1 and 0.0). I gave it what I thought was a good wind and let it run for 24 hours. Still running the first day but when I went to wind it again it felt like something was slipping -- that feeling you get manually winding an automatic even when it's fully wound. The watch stopped 10 hours later. When I wound it wouldn't hold much of a wind at all, maybe running for five minutes before it stopped. The thing that looks odd to me is on the barrel arbor there is a space or gap between the squared section where the ratchet wheel sits and the thicker part that is in the barrel. I almost think the ratchet wheel is slipping in that gap. I also checked the ETA technical sheet for the 289x series and the arbor diagrams don't really show any kind of gap or space there. What do you thnk?

arbor1.jpg

arbor2.jpg

arbor3.jpg

arbor-barrel1.jpg

arbor-ratchet-barrel1.jpg

arbor-ratchet-barrel2.jpg

barrel1.jpg

barrel-and-ratchet.jpg

It does look like the square profile of the arbor has worn at the top towards the barrel bridge allowing the ratchet wheel to ride over it when dial up. How does the hole look in the wheel, starting to round off ? Try winding the watch upside down so the wheel drops to what is left of the square. The ratchet hole looks rounded in the corners and i see no purpose for the unusual shape of the arbor square.  Such a pleasure to see very clear macro shots btw, i applaud you 👍

Edited by Neverenoughwatches
  • Like 1
Posted

That's the thing, though. If the ratchet wheel was slipping I would have expected most of the wear to be on the softer brass wheel than the steel arbor. And I would have expected the wear to show most in the center of the square, not the corners. In any case I have a new arbor and mainspring coming today so I'll see if they look similar.

Posted
12 minutes ago, eccentric59 said:

I would have expected most of the wear to be on the softer brass wheel than the steel arbor. 

That did cross my mind, barrel arbors are pretty hard. Did you try turning your watch over, tapping the case back to encourage the rat wheel to drop onto the more complete part of the square and then wind up from there.

Posted

It is after a couple of wind cycles that this seems to happen. I can get a decent wind right after assembly. There doesn't seem to be any end shake on the barrel either so if the ratchet wheel is slipping something else is going on.

Posted (edited)

Apropos of nothing perhaps- my initial reaction to the in situ photo of the mainspring was- that is a lot of coils. It defies both the not-so-good-rule Rule of Thirds and the a-bit-better-rule 50% Occupancy Rule…🤔

How does a crowded spring behave?

...the movement too new for me to do a quick lookup of the GR size. There are generic replacements avaialble but again, no sizes...

Edited by rehajm
  • Like 1
Posted

That is the spring that came with the watch as bought from eBay and the watch itself is circa 2009, so it would be a safe bet that this is the spring from the factory. No other signs that it has ever been opened/serviced before. I would venture a guess that this problem is why they seller sold so cheaply. New spring and arbor have arrived and I'll be fitting them shortly, but will take comparison shots before closing her up. (Her? Are watches inherently male or female?)

  • Like 1
Posted
29 minutes ago, eccentric59 said:

 

That is the spring that came with the watch as bought from eBay and the watch itself is circa 2009, so it would be a safe bet that this is the spring from the factory. No other signs that it has ever been opened/serviced before

 

…well that’s a rarity from Ebay 😂…and refreshing- I have to start working on newer watches…🥹

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • After another long hiatus (while waiting for truing calipers to arrive), I’ve made some more progress. TRUING IN THE FLAT I was able to use the calipers I purchased to true the wheel in the flat. There’s still a very slight eccentricity in the round, but I’m going to leave it as is. It doesn’t wobble any more and I’m happy with that. Thanks for the tool recommendation @mbwatch. It worked well, though I must say it takes a delicate touch to get the balance between the calipers. Also, my calipers effectively have four different variations based on the orientation of the arms (2 sides, 2 orientations each). Some are more tapered than others, though to what end, I can’t quite tell. My first thought was that flipping them over yields arms that can be used for poising. They are K&D horizontal calipers, btw. OSCILLATION TEST @nevenbekriev @JohnR725 After truing the wheel in the flat, I carefully remounted the hairspring and did your oscillation test. Balance wheel mounted to balance cock, no pallet fork, rotate balance wheel 180 degrees, let it go, and time+count the oscillations. Results as follows for dial down orientation: Duration: 1m 15sec (to full stop) # of oscillations: About 125, though the amplitude of the oscillations decreased significantly, as one might expect I should redo the test in at least two other orientations…Forgot to do that. 🙂  In general, it’s safe to say this watch has a pretty low amplitude, likely for a variety of reasons. I haven’t oiled the balance jewels FWIW…I should probably do that, but I really don’t want to keep disassembling and reassembling the balance. Is it possible to oil those jewels (top and bottom) by just removing the capstones and putting in a tiny amount of oil, with balance in place? I can see how having the pivot in the jewel hole could change how capillary action works, and thus might pull more oil in than desired. However, those capillary forces will be in effect anyway once the balance is inserted. PRACTICE MOVEMENTS @JohnR725 I agree with your sentiment about using practice movements wholeheartedly, and I’ve done that to some degree. The watch I’m currently repairing is for a friend, and she was willing to have me treat it as a “learn-by-doing experience.” With that said,, I probably should have purchased a few more “beaters” before getting to something where I don’t want to muck things up. I’ve still got a couple of those on the bench that I used as donors, and I’ll try to rehabilitate them.
    • Hi, this is the first place I found when looking for advice so I hope someone could advise me.  Im completely new to touching watches but I’ve always wondered how they work.  I’ve bought a cheap movement, an ETA replica to take apart and rebuild.  Im thinking I’ll need some screwdrivers, tweezers, movement holder and a loop? My goal is just to have a go first and see if I enjoy it enough before buying more tools.  Do I buy cheap tools for now and get better quality tools later if I enjoy it like I think I will? or will the cheap tools be a pain and take some of the fun out of it?  With quality tools being relatively expensive I’m unsure what to buy.    Any advice would be greatly appreciated!
    • Yeah I have seen 44-56 documented for Elgin 18 size elsewhere. I have the style of gauge that's like a set of feeler gauges and I never noticed before today it is faintly stamped "Elgin". Pictured is the way I have been measuring. I am going to go to a larger jewel than the 42 that had been in there. I recently won an auction on a big set of Fitrite jewels all in the little bottles, to discover that the what's actually in the bottles bears no relation to the chart of sizes printed on the box. In most cases it seems to be all mixed so in fact I have about 24 little bottles and thousands of assorted jewels of all diameters and lengths, which is better than nothing. But since I don't have a micrometer with a table, measuring for the exact diameter will be a big job. Instead I will test a lot of them in the fork slot the same way I measure with the gauge. But this is still the next thing. I have to get the escapement to unlock first.
    • it would be nice to have the exact model of the watch the or a picture so we can see exactly what you're talking about. this is because the definition of Swiss watch could be a variety of things and it be helpful if we could see exactly the watch your dealing with then in professional watch repair at least some professionals they do pre-cleaned watches. In other words the hands and dial come off and the entire movement assembled goes through a cleaning machine sometimes I think a shorter bath perhaps so everything is nice and clean for disassembly makes it easier to look for problems. Then other professionals don't like pre-cleaning because it basically obliterates the scene of the crime. Especially when dealing with vintage watches where you're looking for metal filings and problems that may visually go away with cleaning. Then usually super sticky lubrication isn't really a problem for disassembly and typically shouldn't be a problem on a pallet fork bridge because there shouldn't be any lubrication on the bridge at all as you typically do not oil the pallet fork pivots.  
    • A few things you should find out before you can mske a decision of what to do. As Richard said, what is the crown and all of the crown components made of . Then also the stem .  The crown looks to have a steel washer that retains a gasket. So be careful with what chemicals you use to dissolve any stem adhesives or the use of heat. You might swell or melt the gasket unless you are prepared to change that also . The steel washer maybe reactive to alum. Something I've just used to dissolve a broken screw from a plate. First drilled out the centre of the screw with a 0.5mm carbide . Dipped only the section that held the broken screw in Rustins rust remover. This is 40 % phosphoric acid. 3 days and the screw remains were completely dissolved, no trace of steel in the brass threads. A black puddle left in the solution.
×
×
  • Create New...