Jump to content

It's addictive isn't it!


Solster

Recommended Posts

I was drawn to this charming little chimer today and just couldn't resist! It's an Enfield, which I realise will be run-of-the-mill to most of you guys, but as a newbie to the art of 'clock recovery' I'm quite chuffed with it. All the bits are there and it seems to keep good time. I did have to adjust the beat, which until a just few months ago I didn't even know what that was, so my learnings have not been wasted 😁 There does seem to be a problem with the strike/chime? though, so I will need to remove the movement for a closer look - so stand by for more questions! Problem now is that I have this unit and the current project on the go - other half isn't massively amused at that thought!!! 🙄

Can anyone shed any light on how old it might be? The movement is stamped ENFIELD, so I'm presuming it's from before Smiths got involved. Would that make it pre-1930's?

Cheers - John.

 

1090156188_ENFIELDv4.jpg.1ae06f6c1cae9fec8d2b78d934433560.jpg 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Solster, yes it is addictive i am still buying clocks even though i have not finished the one i am working on, and they are piling up 😂 need to see the movement hard to date it when Smith's took over Enfield they still used the name until around 1950. Enjoy and take plenty of photo's before you strip it down and when you strip it down it will help when you come to reassemble, there are people here with years of exsperience who can advise you good luck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Willow and Neverenoughwatches, thanks both for your replies,

Here is a shot of the movement, albeit currently still in the case! Looks fairly tidy I think. I noticed a date in pencil on the inside of the door - 10.05.73, which I'm guessing is a service date as there's evidence of the movement having been removed. I guess it's probably due for another after 49 years!

1096455775_ENFIELDMOVEMENTv1.jpg.6a29f5ff786f24824b9732c4a722bf12.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Solster, yes it is possible that date is a service, it looks as if it is a F3 movement which would date it to around c1946 c1956 hard to tell in your photo it's a bit blurred the plates look plain the one i have seen (see Photo) are dimpled and underneath Enfield does it say made in England which then dates it to c1944 c1948.

The bob looks like Smiths Enfield c1938 1948 the original Enfield was lead filled, and the gong was used after 1945.

Hope you can make sense of all that if i am wrong member's with more knowledge will correct me.

See photo of the front it should look like this let us know.

IMG_20220530_070806965.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've now taken the movement out and below are photos of the front and back. The plates all seem to be smooth.

From my very limited knowledge, I think this one is in better condition than my initial project as there doesn't seem to be any play on the pivots. It looks like it's been apart before as the screws show obvious signs of removal. I'm wondering if they were trying to fix the strike/chime side as it only chimes once on the hour, whatever hour it is. I'll have to try and fathom that one out.

I'm half wondering if I should make this my main project as it shouldn't require any re-bushing which fills me with dread!!

Any thoughts or observations welcome - it all helps me learn! Does anyone know if these will be the original hands? They have the right amount of wear I would say, and they fit the style of the clock. Their colouring has rubbed off though - what's the best way to renovate/re-colour them?

Cheers.

 

840840897_Enfieldback.jpg.e8c0f5320ed4c5367822dcd44dbd18e1.jpg1404920856_Enfieldfront.jpg.f7056fd494d6a47590a98209b5f95a50.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Rich, this one seems rather regular movement to me. Yes, what You describe exists, but I doubt that the one on the picture is something similar.
    • @Neverenoughwatches Many thanks for your remarks. As I wrote earlier, I was a bit reluctant to disassemble this movement, and you gave me further motives to be careful. I'll just remove it from its case so as to clean it a little.
    • I am not sure for the terms in english, but if I directly translate from Bulgarian or Russian, there are 'magnetic soft' and 'magnetic hard' magnetic materials. The first group will not get magnetised, thow they will be attracted by magnets. The soft iron for example. The second group, like hardened steel, will get magnetised. So non magnetic hairspring aloys belong to the first group.
    • Looks like it is only dirt. If rust, then this means the strenght of the spring is reduced in places with rust, so the spring is damaged and useless. Only light surface rust, which is rather residual from other places activity of rust can be cleaned, and no chemicals that can etch the metals of the spring aloy should be used Be aware that this usually happens when the dial/hands have radium lume! One of the pivot looks little bent. Not that much to prevent the movement from working, but may be amplitude will be a little bit smaller when this pivot down, resing on the cap stone. Bent pivots always means the balance is out of poise, but it depends on the severity of the bent. Yes it can be straightened, but at this point I will advice to leave it as is and check how the movement performs.
    • Hello, I'm after some help on getting a functional tool for removing and replacing case tubes, the friction fit type not the threaded type. I have previously owned two Chinese Ali Express tools, which worked, but in each case after using on a watch case with an angle the watch had to be manually held perpendicular and when this angle was not perfectly aligned the pusher pin inevitably received a slight side load and the tool body was damaged. Due to the fact that the hole which holds the pusher pin is so close to the end of the block and the material wall is so thin: The result was that the hard pusher pin stretched and deformed the hole and the pusher pin was then slack and no longer perpendicular, and eventually the material split altogether. After I looked at the tool I realised that the block the hole was machined into was aluminum, this coupled with the extremely thin wall made this hole very weak and prone to the deformation and damage I had experienced. I looked to another reputable supplier (see below) who advertised their tool as "all steel" and I even contacted their customer support who confirmed that the block in question was made of steel. I was very disappointed yesterday when it arrived and found that it was in fact aluminum and not steel as promised. I could tell by the feel of the material (weight) and confirmed with a magnet which would not 'stick' and have since requested a return/refund. Assuming the return/refund goes smoothly, I am still left with my original problem of not having a tube pusher tool - does anyone have any recommendation for a tool which will work and will also stand the test of time?
×
×
  • Create New...