Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I recently serviced a spare Vostok 2209 movement to swap into my 80's Amphibia. The movement cleaned up OK and I swapped in a replacement sweep second pinion from a donor as the Rio had been broken off this movement. I ran it all day and tested it on my timegrapher. 270 degrees DU and DD (with the old mainspring) and running about -30 secs in each position and about -50 in the vertical positions. I was quite happy with this so I regulate it to about +18secs DD to even out the average and figure I can wear it for a while to see how it goes on the wrist. 

I uncase the old movement from the watch, remove the hands and dial and swap them all over to the serviced movement. At this point I notice that the amplitude has dropped off massively and the rate is now+600 secs and if I turn the hands backwards it stops the balance. The 2209 has a relatively unusual layout with an indirectly driven cannon pinion, driven through a cutout in the main plate by one of the wheels along with a 'double third wheel' which applies tension to the seconds pinion while driving it. When I wind the hands forward the balance picks up pace again before slowing down.  I took it back out the case and have removed the hands and cannon pinion again and it is still running with low amplitude so I think the problem is further back in the train.

I think I managed to damage the train somehow when installing the hands (perhaps turning them backwards via the cannon pinion when nudging the hands around?). The second hand also jumps around when setting backwards so it looks like an issue with the double third wheel. I serviced a 2234 a few months back (a 2209 with calendar and hacking) and had problems with a warped double third wheel causing erratic running. 

Before I jump back in and strip the watch down again, does anyone have any idea what may be causing this and how I might have done it?

Posted

What You describe - that the second hand jumps when setting hands backwards is normal for this layout of train with double third wheel. Happens when the real cannon pinion(which is on the offcenter 2nd wheel) is tight. Pay attention exactly on this cannon pinion - probably somehow it has moved up on the wheel pivot and thus killing the axial free play of the wheel and rubbing on the bearing in the main plate

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted

I didn't realise that the pinion on that second wheel was loose to act like a cannon pinion. That would make sense I suppose as it is like the setting is firmly connected with the train.

While I know some people 'hack' this movement by holding the setting backwards to stop the movement while they wait for the full minute, I have never seen it so dramatic that it stops the movement completely, needing a shake to start it again on a 2209.

How loose does this pinion have to be? Would I be better swapping this for a spare?

Posted
1 hour ago, Simeon said:

How loose does this pinion have to be? Would I be better swapping this for a spare?

Do you mean to say yours is too tight? That is the good problem to have, and you can possibly add a tiny bit of heavy oil. Usually they are worn out and way too loose causing timekeeping loss in the hands.

Posted
3 hours ago, mbwatch said:

Do you mean to say yours is too tight? That is the good problem to have, and you can possibly add a tiny bit of heavy oil. Usually they are worn out and way too loose causing timekeeping loss in the hands.

Well, I have serviced a couple of these movements now and never noticed that the pinion is rotating free compared to the wheel, certainly not freely spinning. I have never tried to rotate it so not clear what the breakaway torque might be. I am guessing that the one on my movement has locked up, hence the dramatic effect when I set the hands and the drag on amplitude. 

Posted

Need to say that replacing cannon pinions is normally connected with need of adjustment of the tightness. No guarantee that just replacing it will solve anything, as it fits well on one 2nd wheel, may not fit well on another, and this is normal. So, if the pinion is not broken or destroyed in some manner, it needs just adjustment of the tightness.

One needs to have correct feeling about the tightness. Too much will cause problems as  excessive wear and even teeth breaking on the wheels. Not enough will cause irregular stopping of hands movement. For sure, some resistance must be felt when setting hands. But, 'hacking' normally should not happen if the main spring is wound to the end. 

Tightening must be done correctly as to ensure the pinion will stay on it's place and will not come off (up) when rotated, not only correct tightness is needed.

2 minutes ago, Simeon said:

Well, I have serviced a couple of these movements now and never noticed that the pinion is rotating free compared to the wheel, certainly not freely spinning. I have never tried to rotate it so not clear what the breakaway torque might be. I am guessing that the one on my movement has locked up, hence the dramatic effect when I set the hands and the drag on amplitude. 

So, You never took cannon pinions off to clean and then lubricate them? This is wrong, as blocking may happen without lubrication.

Posted

OK, I fixed it (sort of).

I have the amplitude back up to 270 degrees but I'm not entirely sure what I did. Firstly I removed the balance and pallet fork and gave it a wind to see how the train looked. The train looked good, running free with a little rebound at the end. I put the balance and pallets back in and got it started. Better - about 200 degrees amplitude but still prone to stopping when setting the time anticlockwise. I then pulled the barrel bridge to get access to the second wheel that drives the minute pinion / cannon pinion and connects with the intermediate setting wheel through the hole on the main plate. 

Screenshot_2024-09-30-22-33-47-74_99c04817c0de5652397fc8b56c3b3817.thumb.jpg.a537e6b87d8566d9661cd424443732da.jpg

I also took a good look at the second wheel and tried turning the wheel against the bottom pinion. It turned but not easily, so I worked that in place and pressed some oil into the pinion where it projects through the wheel. I tried removing the wheel from the pinion (as @nevenbekrievsuggests) but this is firmly stuck in place with no endshake against the pinion.  Ir doesn't feel like it can come apart for cleaning and lubrication.  Not sure what should be done to properly service this (I didn't want to pull too hard in case I distorted the second wheel.  I compared it to the same wheel from a donor and it was exactly the same, in terms of friction and being unable to remove the bottom wheel. I reinstalled it back in the movement and replaced the barrel bridge, pallet fork and balance. The movement fired up again with 260-270 degrees amplitude. It's not quite as good as it was previously but it now doesn't stop when setting the time anticlockwise (it seems to slow a bit but keeps running)

IMG_20240930_224158.thumb.jpg.b7986fabb1d3f6ad102c7f326b8804df.jpg

I will carefully recase it tomorrow night with no wind in it to stop me from turning the minute pinion (and this wheel) against the train rotation since that's what I think I did to 'break' it. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello all, just disassembling to service, but I can’t figure out the working of the calendar work…it’s not operational the jumper and spring are ok, but the operation of the driving wheel has me at a loss. I can’t see a cam to drive anything. Is something damaged or missing? Help please!
    • Believe the relume (not a fan) was done a long time after the damage. 
    • I can only think of some chemical reaction to reluming
    • I have a little milling attachment for my WW lathe, but very rarely use it and not for wheel and pinion cutting. For that I use a small Sixis 101 milling machine. I normally do direct dividing, but sometimes have to do an odd count and use the universal index which also fits on the Sixis.   Back in the day when I didn't have a mill, I would cut gearing on my Schaublin 102. It has a universal dividing attachment which fits the back of the spindle. Both it and the one for the Sixis are 60:1 ratio, and with the set of 4  index plates I can do almost any division. When I've had to do a strange high count prime number, I print a disc with the needed division and just place the plunger on the dot. Any position error is reduced by a factor of 60 so still plenty accurate.   The machines are a mess in the pics as I'm in the process of making a batch of barrels for a wristwatch 🙃.   This is the Sixis. The head can also be placed vertically, as can the dividing spindle.   Dividing plates. The smaller ones fit another dividing spindle.   Universal divider for the Sixis. I put it together with parts from an odd Sixis spindle that takes w20 collets, like the Schaublin 102, and a dividing attachment from a Schaublin mill.     The dividing attachment for the 102. The gear fits in place of the handwheel at the back of the headstock.   And the little milling attachment for the WW lathe. I just set it on the slide rest to illustrate the size, you can see from the dust on it it really doesn't get used much. I think only when I change bearing in the head, to kiss the collet head seat (grinding wheel still in the milling attachment).
    • I read a lot about the quality (or lack thereof) of Seiko's 4R, 6R, 8L  movements...or more specifically the lack of regulation from the factory. Especially when compared to similar priced manufactures using SW200's or ETA's. I thought I'd ask those more in the know, do the 4R's and 6R's deserve their bad reputation, is it fairly easy for someone with minimal skills (or better yet a trained watch mechanic) to dial in these movements to a more acceptable performance.    For background I spent more on a 1861 Speedy years ago, expecting that the advertised 0-15s/d  would probably perform more like 5-7s/d. In reality it's been closed to 2-4s/d. 
×
×
  • Create New...