Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello. First time poster and to be honest, probably NOT looking to do this repait myself, but instead looking for advice as to what has happened here?

My Tag Heuer Aquaracer Date WAF1010, was working up until yesterday when it stopped. The previous day everything was working, i had changed the date and the time using the crown - all was well.

Seeing it stopped I unscrewed the crown to adjust mode and nothing happened - i pulled ever so slightly harder and it came completely out. Additionally, it you look at the close up of the face, there is a tiny piece of "something" appeared by the hands ... has this come off the crown mechanism itself or is it somethng else? Someone else I asked for advice thought it may be a rubber seal from around the date - which looking at its shape it may be - but that has also appeared since Yesterday! (n.b. I have been wearing the watch so it has not had any trauma!)

The crown goes back in smoothly with no friction and can tighten again to the bezel - but there is just no purchase when pulling partially out and twisting.   What provides the grip (for want of a better word) when turning the crown so that the hours or the date change  

So on to the "help" ... is this something i will need to send away to TAG for a service? Or is it quite a common issue that can be repaired quite simply (albeit probably not by myself).   To be fair it has not been to TAG for a service since I received it, and the most recent battery changes - while carried out by a jeweller - did not include re-gassing as I never take it in the water. So maybe a full service is overdue?   If that is the case  then I would rather do that myself as taking to a jeweller would just result in them sending it off and adding their margin.

However, if this is a common issue  with a standard process to repair, then would i be better of taking to a high street watch repairer?

Any help, pointers or advice gratefully received.

IMG_20240925_164622.jpg

IMG_20240925_164956.jpg

IMG_20240925_164641.jpg

IMG_20240925_164826.jpg

IMG_20240925_164746.jpg

Posted

ok a so a bit more googling suggests that the stem retainer may have failed which allowed the stem to come right out?

I am away on holiday right now (with a non working watch!!) but on my return i can open the back and see if i can see anything - on the assumption that i can manually "tweak" the  stem retainer?

Obv. if the advice here is that I should not be doing that myself then i will hold off!

Posted

I don’t think it will be a “retainer “, it would normally be held in by the setting lever. This may have become dislodged. To check you would need to remove the complete movement from the case, then remove the hands and dial to access the area. You would need to have some knowledge and basic experience along with tools to investigate. If it was a cheap 10 quid watch from the local market I would say give it a go, but this watch is not. Any independent watchmaker could have a look at it and quote for repair, otherwise I would suggest enquiring about the TAG repair.

 

Tom

  • Thanks 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, tomh207 said:

I don’t think it will be a “retainer “, it would normally be held in by the setting lever. This may have become dislodged. To check you would need to remove the complete movement from the case, then remove the hands and dial to access the area. You would need to have some knowledge and basic experience along with tools to investigate. If it was a cheap 10 quid watch from the local market I would say give it a go, but this watch is not. Any independent watchmaker could have a look at it and quote for repair, otherwise I would suggest enquiring about the TAG repair.

 

Tom

thanks- great insights.  Given i have had it 15 years without a full TAG service, it is probably overdue ... they can also remove that rogue residue that has somehow got into the face by the hands as well!

Posted

What's on the hands is the surround from the 'Tag Heuer'

I expect the problem is with the Stem Maintaining Plate which would probably be just a simple movement swap for an independent watchmaker.

image.thumb.png.66a8ede5627c42bcc27ecd55ad8c11be.png

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • 3 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello all, just disassembling to service, but I can’t figure out the working of the calendar work…it’s not operational the jumper and spring are ok, but the operation of the driving wheel has me at a loss. I can’t see a cam to drive anything. Is something damaged or missing? Help please!
    • Believe the relume (not a fan) was done a long time after the damage. 
    • I can only think of some chemical reaction to reluming
    • I have a little milling attachment for my WW lathe, but very rarely use it and not for wheel and pinion cutting. For that I use a small Sixis 101 milling machine. I normally do direct dividing, but sometimes have to do an odd count and use the universal index which also fits on the Sixis.   Back in the day when I didn't have a mill, I would cut gearing on my Schaublin 102. It has a universal dividing attachment which fits the back of the spindle. Both it and the one for the Sixis are 60:1 ratio, and with the set of 4  index plates I can do almost any division. When I've had to do a strange high count prime number, I print a disc with the needed division and just place the plunger on the dot. Any position error is reduced by a factor of 60 so still plenty accurate.   The machines are a mess in the pics as I'm in the process of making a batch of barrels for a wristwatch 🙃.   This is the Sixis. The head can also be placed vertically, as can the dividing spindle.   Dividing plates. The smaller ones fit another dividing spindle.   Universal divider for the Sixis. I put it together with parts from an odd Sixis spindle that takes w20 collets, like the Schaublin 102, and a dividing attachment from a Schaublin mill.     The dividing attachment for the 102. The gear fits in place of the handwheel at the back of the headstock.   And the little milling attachment for the WW lathe. I just set it on the slide rest to illustrate the size, you can see from the dust on it it really doesn't get used much. I think only when I change bearing in the head, to kiss the collet head seat (grinding wheel still in the milling attachment).
    • I read a lot about the quality (or lack thereof) of Seiko's 4R, 6R, 8L  movements...or more specifically the lack of regulation from the factory. Especially when compared to similar priced manufactures using SW200's or ETA's. I thought I'd ask those more in the know, do the 4R's and 6R's deserve their bad reputation, is it fairly easy for someone with minimal skills (or better yet a trained watch mechanic) to dial in these movements to a more acceptable performance.    For background I spent more on a 1861 Speedy years ago, expecting that the advertised 0-15s/d  would probably perform more like 5-7s/d. In reality it's been closed to 2-4s/d. 
×
×
  • Create New...