Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

First pocket watch under my belt, listening to the tic-toc is so satisfying.  The timing is all over the place as is the trace, but i managed to capture a photo of the tg rate at 0 seconds per , so I'm avin that one 🤣. Taking bets as to the amount of power reserve and timing in my pocket. 🙂

20240920_230926.jpg

20240920_230836.jpg

  • Like 2
Posted

Pleased with how this has turned out, the quality is poor , a few modifications needed , mostly around the hairspring and getting it to breathe unobstructed. I thought i could install the balance with the top plate on by unscrewing the bottom bearing for the balance. Very awkward indeed, i even filed a lip off the bottom plate where it penatrated  but that still didn't give enough room to install it safely. In the end i unscrewed three plate screws and wedged paper between the top plate and bottom pillars to enable me to just sneak the balance between the plates. On top of that some adjustment to the time setting lever parts that wouldn't allow the pendant to pull out easily. Only getting around 18 hours of run time , but in that the movement had gained just one minute. The time set is stiff as is the winding mechanism,  with no reference I dont know how it should be. I need to have a crack at another one...............but which ?

20240921_133729.jpg

  • Like 3
Posted
9 hours ago, rehajm said:

How amusing for you…

Only joke rehajm only a joke, dont take it personally 🏳.  I didn't check any other positions reason being it wasn't important to me what the tg reading were, not with something like this. But pandant up would have made more sense with it being the watch's main uasage position.

Posted (edited)

I find the Ingersoll movements to be the most friendly dollar movements to work on (over Ingraham and Westclox). Though the keyless design is weirder and requires standing a rectangular winding pinion plate into two foot holes against spring tension to get the plates together while also aligning all the pivots, the mechanisms work better than that stupid sliding bar thing you found in the Westclox and similar in Ingraham.

I don't think I have seen an Ingersoll as recent as 60s/70s though. I've only worked on 20s-40s.

Edited by mbwatch
Posted
1 hour ago, mbwatch said:

I find the Ingersoll movements to be the most friendly dollar movements to work on (over Ingraham and Westclox). Though the keyless design is weirder and requires standing a rectangular winding pinion plate into two foot holes against spring tension to get the plates together while also aligning all the pivots, the mechanisms work better than that stupid sliding bar thing you found in the Westclox and similar in Ingraham.

I don't think I have seen an Ingersoll as recent as 60s/70s though. I've only worked on 20s-40s.

The westclox had a similar winding pinion set into a plate The pendant doesn't remove on this one, fixed into the case but is split with a bottom half that is spring loaded and connects to the top half of the stem by two cutouts in each half. To get the movement out of the case i had to slide a hoop of copper wire between the winding pinion and clutch to seperate the two halves of the stem. I have to work out now how to lift the pallet fork so it doesn't rub on the safety roller, i think bending the fork up is my only option.  The 60's production is a bit of a guess, considering the condition of this, looks like its been stuck in a drawer hardly used , probably this fork/roller issue.

Posted
49 minutes ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

To get the movement out of the case i had to slide a hoop of copper wire between the winding pinion and clutch to seperate the two halves of the stem

Oh that's unusual. The older ones had a similar design (if I get your description) but the pendant just had a wide protrusion that fit loosely into a slot on on the springy winding pinion, like a fat screwdriver blade. So the movement could be dropped right out because the two were not affixed, and to put it in you just turned the crown until the two slotted together.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, mbwatch said:

Oh that's unusual. The older ones had a similar design (if I get your description) but the pendant just had a wide protrusion that fit loosely into a slot on on the springy winding pinion, like a fat screwdriver blade. So the movement could be dropped right out because the two were not affixed, and to put it in you just turned the crown until the two slotted together.

Yep thats what i have mb,  my description probably misled . I wasn't sure how well the movement would come out as the spring has a lot of tension, the copper spacer hoop kept the two pieces of the stem and pendant seperate, all i had to do was lift the case up free once the four securing screws were removed.

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Righty ho, I re-serviced the chrono module and got a reasonable result with minimal loss of amplitude when not running the chrono and about 30 degrees loss when running. Great. The problem is now that the chrono (and movement) stops running after about a minute or so, a tap on the watch starts it running again. No issues with the movement running when the chrono is stopped. Going to service it yet again, obviously some residual issues with friction in the chrono module (Very frustrating - I wish there was some way of testing it as I go!) I also seem to have a problem with the cannon pinion where the movement is running continuously (with the chrono stopped) but it's losing significant time / stopping. This is one of those two piece ETA style with a driving wheel pressed over the cannon pinion, obviously arranged for driving the chrono module. I had no issues with this prior to service and just added a small amount of grease between the driving wheel and the centre cannon pinion as the technical guide required. What's the best way of tightening these up? I would like to replace it but I guess this is going to be hard to find as it is dedicated to the DD chrono movement. 
    • He uses the micrometer cap, but he leaves the spring out (you can see that in the video). If you leave the spring in, the spindle will move up as well (as shown by @Knebo).
    • Seems like he doesn't have the micrometer cap  attached to the spindle so he can only push down but cannot pull up? If the cap screws into the spindle I guess you don't need the spring? I only have a "normal" Seitz so I really have no idea. 
    • Do you have a part number for the bearing shim lock tool?
    • Yes in my opinion the 3/4HP is plenty but it’s your decision & yes it does come with speed control but foot operation so my reason for changing to potentiometer was because my leg shakes so it was like me revving the lathe & anyway I prefer to set the speed. I & a few others that I recommended the motor to run a Pultra 10mm lathe so if you have a 6 or 8mm B & L then it will be plenty, if you have seen any of my videos you will have seen that when using a graver I run quite slow without any problems. Dell
×
×
  • Create New...