Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello

I bought myself a snkk57 for a decent price. Was planning on possibly doing a service if needed and it seemed like the crown wasn’t original so thought I would replace it.

Now in hindsight I realize that the crown not being original was a big red flag but meeh 🤷‍♂️

As you can see on the pictures the movement is replaced and it looks like Frankensteins watch. I want to try to get it back to original so I am trying to figure out the parts needed. 
 

I think the correct movement is a 7s26b but I don’t really know what crown/stem to get. Also I don’t know if there is a movement spacer needed and most of the movements I find on ebay comes without the day ring so will the one from this 7019 movement fit on a 7s26?
 

Could anyone of you kind people who might know a thing or two about this watch point me in the right direction please 🙏

IMG_8542.jpeg

IMG_8545.jpeg

Posted
9 minutes ago, AndyGSi said:

What's the full details from the case back (presuming that's correct).

Also what's on the rotor and what's the dial code.

7s26-03r0 (seems to be correct but I am far from a seiko expert)

rotor has 7009a on it

Haven’t removed the dial yet. I disputed the price when I received the watch since I noticed the movement was wrong. We agreed today that I will get some of the money back and keep the watch so I just started to look for parts needed. Thought I would ask around before I start buying all the nos seiko parts I can (and can’t) find lol

Posted (edited)

7S26-03R0 is correct for a SNKK57 and dial code should be 10T2.

The weight is the same on these movements along with the 7S26B but it does look like you've got a 7009A movement.

Apart from that I think the only other obvious things as you said is the spacer ring.

image.thumb.png.c9a9aed66b05d6717b9a5f66132d5c85.png

Edit

Can you confirm the dial code as I think you've either not got a SNKK57 or the strap is wrong.

 

Edited by AndyGSi
Posted
14 hours ago, AndyGSi said:

7S26-03R0 is correct for a SNKK57 and dial code should be 10T2.

The weight is the same on these movements along with the 7S26B but it does look like you've got a 7009A movement.

Apart from that I think the only other obvious things as you said is the spacer ring.

image.thumb.png.c9a9aed66b05d6717b9a5f66132d5c85.png

Edit

Can you confirm the dial code as I think you've either not got a SNKK57 or the strap is wrong.

 

Hmm that doesn’t sound too good, actually thought the dial, case and strap looked original. 
 

I will be back home tomorrow and confirm the dial code. Can send some more pictures of everything as well 👍

Posted
On 11/29/2024 at 10:59 PM, AndyGSi said:

7S26-03R0 is correct for a SNKK57 and dial code should be 10T2.

The weight is the same on these movements along with the 7S26B but it does look like you've got a 7009A movement.

Apart from that I think the only other obvious things as you said is the spacer ring.

image.thumb.png.c9a9aed66b05d6717b9a5f66132d5c85.png

Edit

Can you confirm the dial code as I think you've either not got a SNKK57 or the strap is wrong.

 

Just checked, no dial code and a lot of glue underneath the dial. The half-scam just turned into a full scam.

not really sure of what to do with this watch now 🤔

IMG_8548.jpeg

Posted
5 minutes ago, AxelSLK said:

Just checked, no dial code and a lot of glue underneath the dial. The half-scam just turned into a full scam.

not really sure of what to do with this watch now 🤔

IMG_8548.jpeg

Dial code is on the front at the bottom but couldn't make it out from your photos.

Posted (edited)

If it wasn't for all that glue and extra holes on the back I'd have put it as a good dial but the glue and holes make me doubt it.

If it is a fake then it's the best I've seen and from the front the only thing I can see wrong is the '5' under the Seiko, but this could just be your original photo.

This is what it should look like.

image.png.f5202e9e3afad7c1e9df6b3b70cf6df4.png

Edit

Can you post another photo of yours to compare with this one.

image.thumb.png.96ea26cd8ea0376fbb179ccd035640db.png

Edited by AndyGSi
Posted
9 minutes ago, AndyGSi said:

If it wasn't for all that glue and extra holes on the back I'd have put it as a good dial but the glue and holes make me doubt it.

If it is a fake then it's the best I've seen and from the front the only thing I can see wrong is the '5' under the Seiko, but this could just be your original photo.

This is what it should look like.

image.png.f5202e9e3afad7c1e9df6b3b70cf6df4.png

Edit

Can you post another photo of yours to compare with this one.

image.thumb.png.96ea26cd8ea0376fbb179ccd035640db.png

Yeah the glue made my heart sink a bit.

This is the best picture I could get. Truth be told I can’t really find any differences compared to the one in your pic. Even the lume seems alright 

IMG_8550.jpeg

Posted

Agreed, in the new photo you've posted from the front it looks 100% legit so can't get my head around the glue and holes.

Was also thinking about the dial feet but realised that's why they hadn't used a movement ring on the 7009 or they wouldn't have lined up.

I think all you can do is get a 7S26 movement and ring and maybe a new crown.

Posted
50 minutes ago, AndyGSi said:

Agreed, in the new photo you've posted from the front it looks 100% legit so can't get my head around the glue and holes.

Was also thinking about the dial feet but realised that's why they hadn't used a movement ring on the 7009 or they wouldn't have lined up.

I think all you can do is get a 7S26 movement and ring and maybe a new crown.

Alright thanks mate! Truth be told, don’t know if I care too much if it’s original or not. Not planning on selling the watch and this gives it a good story imo

Still feels a bit better to know that at least some of it is original 😄

  • 1 month later...
Posted

Trying to revive this thread since I need some more assistance. 
 

I decided on buying a NOS 7s26c since from the pictures I could find on this watch it either had the B or C model of the 7s26 and from what I could understand it would be basically the same. 

Finally got everything I needed to put it together but when trying to screw down the caseback it doesn’t fit. Turns out there are higher and more shallow dial/movement spacer for these movements? Anyone that could point me in the right direction?

Also, I can’t seem to find the correct crown for this one. The one that came with the watch looks a bit too small and it doesn’t fit with the new movement and the stem that came with it. 
 

Turns out this good deal is a huge pain in the ass 😅

Posted
34 minutes ago, AndyGSi said:

From the catalogues it's showing the crown as a 9M50AFSNS1 which is 5mm diameter.

So which dial spacer have you got?

image.thumb.png.efa6168ab4beb0eae89a96833f944a50.png

Ah great news! Thanks.

unfortunately I need to take it apart again to have a look but seems like I should be able to sort this out after all. Thanks for the help! 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Please do not file nothing. I have no time this days and am able to write here only in midnight time, so please wait...
    • The project is still alive. The parts are roughed out from ground flat bar stock. But before I can move ahead I decided I needed to replace the spindle bearings of my milling machine. There was too much play on the spindle.. But after diasassembly and measuring the bearing spacers, it turned out that the difference in height was 1,89 mm. Way too much to achieve preload on non-paired bairings. So, the spacers need to be ground to get them to the same height so I can use a paired bearing set. To do that I need my surface grinder up and running and that needed a hydraulics overhaul. And that would be easier if I clean out my parts washer/de-greaser first..😀 So... this is getting to be one of those "I need to fix the machine I need to fix this machine to...." type of situation. Happy as a clam though 😃
    • Have a look at this discussion where I show what I use.  
    • Hello fellow watchmakers, I have a question for all of you, especially those who regularly work with the Sellita SW200-1 movement. At my workplace, we mostly handle watches with the SW200-1. As many of you might already know, this movement has a known issue with the ratchet wheel teeth breaking. However, recently, I've observed a noticeable increase in problems like: More frequent ratchet wheel teeth breakage Screws getting loose and falling off Sudden drops in amplitude And other irregular behaviors So here’s my main question: Before doing the final assembly of an SW200-1, what are the mandatory checks I should perform to ensure proper functioning and avoid post-service failures? For example, I already check: Ratchet wheel teeth condition Canon pinion friction Accuracy and amplitude Screw tightness Jewels condition But I’d love to hear from all of you — what other important things do you check during assembly? Any tips, tricks, or personal checklist items would be extremely helpful for me and ot hers working on this movement.  
    • Hello and welcome from Leeds, England. 
×
×
  • Create New...