Jump to content

Which balance staff for Omega 26.5T3 ?


mikepilk

Recommended Posts

I've got an Omega 26.5 T3 (non-Incabloc) with both pivots broken on the balance staff.

There appears to be several versions available - Incabloc, normal, short, long. 

I've found Ronda 1855, 2796, 3880

Can anyone help as to which I need, or do I have to push out the old one and try to measure it ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are all dimension for the three you listed the same?  

Expectedly different size  rollers and H/S collets .....etc   . 

You will remove the staff anyway, the right choice/ requirments  can then be determined with certainty.

Regards joe

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, mikepilk said:

But with both pivots missing, and two of the staffs only 0.05 mm difference in length !

I might be able to do it on the width at the hairspring collet.

Right,  reffering to the model clockboy just posted, you also measure G the roller diameter .Though the pivot ligne( diameter) is not available to measure, other sizes are enough for selecting exact correct one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mikepilk said:

But with both pivots missing, and two of the staffs only 0.05 mm difference in length !

I might be able to do it on the width at the hairspring collet.

Measure as best you can. I purchased a balance from Balancestaffs.com and it was the wrong size. Its not their fault though...these older movements are difficult to source parts for. I looked up on J Borel and BestFit MATSYS and they both say 100/594 balance staff, but I can't fine the dimensions. If the Ronda is easier for you to get, then go with the 2796.

1.png.0e46a5b0bd0f1e45b93c616735831ed8.png

1461019129_Screenshot2018-10-20at3_06_47PM.thumb.png.a4409917b0df437ef6fbf7a758f27a92.png

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Assuming the staff in the wheel you got was the correct one, Correct dimemsioms being the main issue,  the difference in pivot diameter 11.75 and 12 are not expected to produce beat error or problems of the sort, or even if we assume all the .05 mm difference in length is in section B, no fault is expected form that either.

I think larger  forced into the wheel would have a roll in the wheel deformation, I am not sure though, perhaps experiences of Clockboy or OH comes to help and answer this. 

Inserting  any linge 12 pivot into the jewels answers some questions, for instance you can see the pivot end coming out of the reverse side of the jewel or not and how far it sticks out.

 All staff sizes are available,  further response coming in will help.

Regards joe

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2796 is for incabloc is 327 long 

1855 non incabloc is 310 long

But there is also a version for 26.5 that is 1856 that is 332 long 

All in my Ronda book . The 3880 i can't find under Omega. 

Found this and hope it can help out as the dimension on the collet is different. Maybe you can figure out which one you need by measuring . 

https://www.ebay.com/itm/Omega-balance-staff-26-5-26-5T1-26-5T2-26-5T3-100-axe-de-balancier-Unruhwelle-/201826585959

Edited by rogart63
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, rogart63 said:

2796 is for incabloc is 327 long 

1855 non incabloc is 310 long

But there is also a version for 26.5 that is 1856 that is 332 long 

All in my Ronda book . The 3880 i can't find under Omega. 

Found this and hope it can help out as the dimension on the collet is different. Maybe you can figure out which one you need by measuring . 

https://www.ebay.com/itm/Omega-balance-staff-26-5-26-5T1-26-5T2-26-5T3-100-axe-de-balancier-Unruhwelle-/201826585959

I found that on ebay too - that's why I mentioned the collet size.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bestfit online is nice but sometimes the physical books are nicer. So 594 is listed as non-Incabloc. Then the problem with finding the size of the staff is you have to have an idea of how long it is. So I've attached images for the 594 staff size and the equivalent balancestaff.com staff and its size. Then one of the problems with aftermarket replacement staffs even if they're made for a specific watch is they tend to vary a little by size. Usually there physically bigger to allow you to reduce things to fit. It's why the length isn't that important the pivots can be longer and then you can just shorten those. So it's always important with balance staffs to measure what you are taking out and comparing to what you put in to avoid unpleasant surprises.

Then because of the confusion I'm also listing of the Bestfit Incabloc number and its size just so you can compare to whatever. 

OME 26.5T3    100/594    STAFF/OME 26.5    BESTFIT BALANCE STAFF

OME 26.5T3    100/857    STAFF/OME 100    BESTFIT BALANCE STAFF  Incabloc

100/857
A  327
B  160
C 90
D 50
E 43

BF STAFF.JPG

STAFF 594.JPG

26.5t5 staff.JPG

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've just measured the staff.  I Haven't removed it yet, so had to use digital verniers instead of a micrometer.

.... and realised that the roller and collet diameters (G and K above) the same for all the staffs !

My measurements are collet 49, roller 41.

I found this on an ebay ad :

image.thumb.png.d1809f59798538aca6d6d06d992b074b.png

If 2796 and 3880 are only for Incabloc, then it's got to be 1855/6. And from the collet sizes, it looks like Ronda 1856 is the one ?

 

 

 

Edited by mikepilk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

Bestfit online is nice but sometimes the physical books are nicer. So 594 is listed as non-Incabloc. Then the problem with finding the size of the staff is you have to have an idea of how long it is. So I've attached images for the 594 staff size and the equivalent balancestaff.com staff and its size. Then one of the problems with aftermarket replacement staffs even if they're made for a specific watch is they tend to vary a little by size. Usually there physically bigger to allow you to reduce things to fit. It's why the length isn't that important the pivots can be longer and then you can just shorten those. So it's always important with balance staffs to measure what you are taking out and comparing to what you put in to avoid unpleasant surprises.

Then because of the confusion I'm also listing of the Bestfit Incabloc number and its size just so you can compare to whatever. 

OME 26.5T3    100/594    STAFF/OME 26.5    BESTFIT BALANCE STAFF

OME 26.5T3    100/857    STAFF/OME 100    BESTFIT BALANCE STAFF  Incabloc

100/857
A  327
B  160
C 90
D 50
E 43

BF STAFF.JPG

STAFF 594.JPG

26.5t5 staff.JPG

Yes I like physical books myself, but it's hard to beat online reference tools for convenience. Great, You found the measurements for 100/594! One thing you mentioned is the fact that many aftermarket staffs tend to vary, but keep in mind not everyone has a lathe or Jacot tool to shorten a staff or reduce a pivot--not trivial!

J

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/22/2018 at 5:08 AM, noirrac1j said:

Yes I like physical books myself, but it's hard to beat online reference tools for convenience. Great, You found the measurements for 100/594! One thing you mentioned is the fact that many aftermarket staffs tend to vary, but keep in mind not everyone has a lathe or Jacot tool to shorten a staff or reduce a pivot--not trivial!

J

The 100/594 looks almost the same as Ronda 1856 - length 330 v 332, collet/roller diameters only 0.01 difference. 

I'll go for which ever I can find.

I don't have a lathe, but do have a Jacot tool, so can only do minor adjustments.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello everybody, sorry for the late reply. Thank you all so much for your help and your tips. I got lucky and found a replacement wheel bridge for cheap which actually ended up being in decent condition. I decided not to do anything about the mainspring barrel pivot since I didn't have the right tools and the barrel didn't have much endshake anyhow. I am happy to report that the watch now runs great, I have regulated it to about +-10/s day which is fine by my standards. The timegrapher result looks decent as well, although beat error is around 0.6ms which could be better I suppose. Amplitude reaches over 230 quite consistently which I'm happy with also. My lighter fluid has also been replaced by balance spring cleaning solution and now the springs don't stick to themselves anymore - who would have thought. I'm super happy with this watch, it might not be worth a whole lot but it's awesome that I could restore it and it makes me wear it with pride. To me it's a genuinely good lucking watch, it'll be my daily driver for a while. Thanks again to everybody for their input! I couldn't have done the repair without your help.   Here are some images for those interested, the bracelet isn't original but I don't really mind:    
    • Balance-hairspring system is oscillator with big Q-factor. When all in the movement is OK, the rate (frequency) is verry close to the own resonant frequency of the balance-hairspring. But in some cases, the movement (with foult) will force the resonator to work on pritty different frequency, sometimes faster, and sometimes slower. When this happens, the amplitude is always weak. So, the first thing to ask is what is the amplitude. If it is more than 180 and the hairspring doesn't touch itself and anything else, then for sure it is 'short'. If the amplitude is weak, then the first thing to do is to understand why and rectify the problem. At this time no point to check timekeeping. But, if one doubts that the hairspring is not correct, then He needs to calcullate the rate of the movement, then to 'vibrate' the balance-hairspring out of the movement and to measure the free oscillations frequency (period) with timer in order to ensure that they comply with the rate. If we have pictures, then it will be easier to tell something about that wheel.
    • So much work has gone into this! Thanks again @Jon. I will go back and check my adjustments from last weekend. A few questions for you, if you don't mind. In the reset position, I can understand the problem if the gap between the hammer and the minute counter heart is too big (slide 77) but what is bad about both hammers being in contact with the cams (slide 76)? I read somewhere that Landeron recommended grease on the runner cam, but the minute counter heart should be dry. Is that so, and why? How many tads in a ligne?
×
×
  • Create New...