Jump to content

Omega Deville 1964- stem removal


fucpl

Recommended Posts

Hello All

I have a following watch on my bench at the moment. I have successfully opened the case but now I'm facing a problem with stem removal. I have researched a subject prior to posting here and I understand the watch has a split stem which i have never encountered before. I tried pulling it with fingers quite firmly but it didn't go. Can anybody share a technique of how to remove it. I'd  greatly appreciate  help with this as this is my first expensive piece that I'm working on and I can't afford to make a fatal mistake. Thanx in advance

IMG_20181016_163550.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you are sure of he stem being two pieces.

Pull the stem outmost  as for hour or date set .

Insert your tweerzers as if you are holding the stem with it.push furthure in at some point it will break loose.

The stem may fly to orbit, so avoid getting lost.

Regatds joe

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanx for quick answers. Do you think cannon pinion removal tool will handle the job? It gives me chills when i think i have to do something forcefully. Correct me if I'm wrong ; during the assembly you just slide it back to the socket and the whole gently fits back into movement?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Offcourse if you got nippers OH method is superior.

To reinstal, you got to feel the split in the stem is rightly possioned to mount onto the inner piece. Right you just push instal with bare hand no need for excess force.

Regards joe

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Depends how tight it is. I know it sounds drastic what I said on how to remove the stem. Believe me it has always worked for me. If the stem has a little rust around the two-piece separating then it will be hard to pull away. You are correct about putting it back, just a little grease on the beak of the stem will help. If the stem is rusty, it might need replacing.   Here is a photo so you can see what the two piece stem is like.

index.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Omega uses quality sturdy crown.yet canon pinion remover may hurt, crush the crown. If you don,t have a nipper, you can borrow a fork off of dining table.slide the stem through the fork to the end of the fork. Push with thumb behind it, you can put a piece of mask tape for crown restaint.

Low risks braking rusted female stem, or the crown from the stem. This is where OH method is superior, no force on the crown to brake.

Sometimes the inner piece pulled to the outermost position, can be seen under the dial. In which case and if the stem is rusty , weak.you can position the male and female parts ( with the crown and stem in place ) so to slide the male part in female part. This eleminates the risk of breaking.

It is not as bad as you feel about it, easy and little risk.

Rgards joe

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I use a small pair of side cutters. Similar to OH method but with the flat of the side cutters against the cased the crown pulled out, slowly close the side cutters and the beveled side of the side cutters slowly & safely separates the stem. No drama, no worries.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I've remained silent on this thread, and at the risk of upsetting everyone, the thing that worries me the most the the apparent absence of Mark. The moderators do a great job and the members also pitch in, and the site seems to run itself, but it is a concern for the future of this forum when the owner is absent for all intents and purposes. Like many of the comments above I would hate to log in one day and things be closed down as I rely on this site for ideas and knowledge and also cheer me up. maybe the Moderators could reach out to him, assuming he does not read this thread, and express our concerns and let us know the plans going forward? some kind of WRT ark
    • That was the exact reason for me starting this thread watchie. Still we haven't worked out how the regulars are going to hook up if it goes tits up. I honestly think something should be arranged to stay in contact, we all help each other so much. 
    • Yeah ive watched that a few times before,  i couldnt find my old school dividers to scribe it up 😅 Yep thats the guy i bought a roll from . Thanks Nicklesilver that answers that perfectly and more or less what i thought an experiment over time would prove . The jumper arm is quite thick along its length, i left it that way intentionally, i thought the original was probably very thin, i didnt see that it was already missing. Setting isn't particularly stiff as such just positive, i still need to take it out and polish where it mates with the stem release. 
    • Yes, "Sold out" is difficult to understand. There doesn't seem to be a lot going on. It's been nine months since any new video was published on the Watch Repair Channel. The Level 4 course on watchfix.com has been in progress for what feels like forever (several years!?). Maybe Mark's enterprises aren't doing well or perhaps already so profitable there's nothing much to motivate him for more material. Or, perhaps these days he's more into crochet. The real reason is probably something entirely different but it would be nice/interesting to know. I don't mean to sound gloomy or pessimistic, but I wouldn't be surprised to be met by an HTTP 404. Every day feels like a gift. Speaking of watchfix.com I've been postponing the "Level 5: Servicing Chronograph Watches" course for a very, very long time. Anyway, I just enrolled on it so it's going to be very interesting to see the videos. I must say, IMO there's nothing really that can compete with Mark's courses when it comes to presentation and video quality. It's simply world-class and makes me associate with some really expensive BBC productions.
    • Steel has some funny properties, or at least counterintuitive. The modulus of elasticity is effectively (not exactly, but close enough) the same for steel that is annealed and hardened. What changes is the point of plastic deformation* . If the movement of your spring doesn't pass that, it should work fine. It looks a little thick, I would thin it a bit maybe from the main body out about halfway, maybe 10-20% thinner (not in thickness, along its form). But if it works it works!   *So- if you have two bars of the same steel, one annealed, one at 600 Vickers (general hardness watch arbors might be), clamp them to a table so the same length is hanging out, and put a weight on the ends, they will bend the same amount. But if you continue to add weight, then remove it, at a point the annealed bar won't return to its original straightness. That's the point of plastic deformation. But up to that point, as springs, they are the same. However- their wear characteristics will be very very different. And getting the hardened bar past its point of plastic deformation takes a lot more effort.
×
×
  • Create New...