Jump to content

Record 1955-2 train question


Recommended Posts

I bought an old Record cal 1955-2 recently on eBay. It was described as needing a new balance, but otherwise looked in great condition for what must be nearly 50 years old.

Indeed it needed a new balance, although at first I was confused. The hairspring wasn’t located between the pins so I sorted that and put it on the timegrapher whereupon it ran beautifully... although I subsequently realised when it lost time that it was running at 18000bph instead of 19800bph. I tracked down a new balance and now it beats beautifully at 19800bph... but it still loses 5 seconds every minute.

The 1955-2 is equivalent to Longines 505 (http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?10&ranfft&&2uswk&Longines_505). Longines 506 and 508 in the same series run at 21600bph, so I’m assuming that someone took parts from a 506 or 508 train and put them in this watch. Question is, how do I find out which ones? The usual on line parts source directories (Cousins, Boley, Borel) don’t list the train wheels for the two so I can’t work out which ones it might be.

I have seen escape wheels for both the 19800 and 21600 calibres listed on eBay and the photos of these show identical numbers of teeth, so I guess that isn’t it, (unless one of them is wrongly listed) but I wondered if anyone knows any simple tricks for working this out?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It sounds like the hairspring needs to be shorter. Too long and it will run slow, too short and it will run fast. This is provided that it simply isn’t running erratically because of another problem somewhere.steve


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a formula for calculating out the frequency so you have the right gear ratio for your gear train. It's found that the link below. You can at least do the calculation and see what frequency your gear train thinks it's for. Then if you're good at math you can probably figure out which wheel is at fault. Then the escape wheel for the 506 and 508 are the same. The number of teeth on the escape wheel are probably the same but the number of leaves On the pinion is probably not. 

https://books.google.com/books?id=nZ27BvJwol4C&pg=PA81&lpg=PA81&dq=Calculation+of+the+number+of+vibrations+per+hour+Watch&source=bl&ots=5qP-k1sz-I&sig=bL28H-7jfrQKM6V4-l8B88Quo7I&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiH1oGglYXeAhW0KX0KHc05BWsQ6AEwCXoECAAQAQ#v=onepage&q=Calculation of the number of vibrations per hour Watch&f=false

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks John.

This was easier than I thought when I got into it...

(72 teeth on 4th wheel x 15 on escape wheel x 2 pallets x 60 rotations of second hand per hour) / 6 leaves on escape pinion = 21600 bph

Changing the leaves or teeth on the escape wheel gives wierd answers, but substituting 66 teeth on the 4th wheel gives 19800bph. Lo and behold, looking at pictures on eBay, the correct listed part has 66 teeth. It even has 7 spokes instead of 6 to make it easier to tell apart.

So far my £45 bargain watch has cost me £40 to get a balance sent from the US (which I was kind of expecting) and now it looks like another £25 for a 4th wheel, and I still have a worn bush on the auto winder and a dodgy quick date change to sort out before I strip it down for a proper clean. Let’s hope I don’t find much else, and it’s a good job I’m not doing this (or worse still paying someone else) to make a profit!

72B64DFC-785F-434A-AD4C-2215D20B05A9.thumb.jpeg.7606c7c04aca8c436e12efa32d6b19fb.jpeg

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • people be honest.... Swatch is evil for the watchmakers and repairers, BUT not everything in watches from Switzerland is from the Swatch-Group. As far as i know, Selitta got sacked by Swatch as a Movement-Assembler for them and they started to produce Movements in their own Name with slight Modifications. As far as i know, they sell Parts to the Market for their Movements. In most cases, if a ETA-Movement fails, it is a valid Option to replace it with a Selitta Movement, which i consider the Solution for this Mess with the Swatch-Group...... I have no Connection to anybody at Selitta, but being a Swiss-Guy, i still like to have Swiss-Made Watches, but not from the Swatch-Group.   ok ? regards, Ernst
    • Just one more greedy act by Swatch. They started a number of years ago here in the US..cutting off supplies to watchmakers that could build complications that many Swatch houses couldn't even touch. Old school masters who had gone through some of the most prestigious houses in the world. Otto Frei has some statements on their page about it. I tell all my customers to avoid new Swiss watches like the plague,..unless they just want an older one in their collection that still has some parts out on the market, or they have really deep pockets and don't mind waiting months and paying through the nose to get it back. Plenty of others to choose from..IE Seiko,..or other non-swiss brands Even a number of Chinese brands are catching up with the Swiss,..and I think that in time, their actions will be their downfall
    • Yes. If that's not what you are experiencing...start looking for something rubbing. A 1st guess is that one of the hands is rubbing against the hole in the center of the dial. Especially if you now have lower amplitude in face up/ face down positions.
    • Once a movement has the dial and hands put back and it is recased, would you expect the assembled watch to have the same amplitude as when the movement is in a movement holder and is without hands and dial? Thanks
    • C07641+ not sure what the "+" is for after the last digit.
×
×
  • Create New...