Jump to content

Anyone got one of these lathes??


Lenj

Recommended Posts

That looks like Unimat 1. If it is they are only good for wood work. The Unimat 6 is for metal. For the price of the Unimat 6 you should be able to get hold of a Unimat 3 which is very good for clock pivots. For watch work you need a watchmakers lathe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would suggest that this lathe would be suitable for lightweight model making.  It is configured for metal cutting, but I would question the accuracy of both the three jaw chuck and tailstock.  Diametrical run out and the smallest diameter the chuck will hold are both unlikely to be suitable for watch work.

It may be if some use for larger clock parts, but if you want a lathe for working on microscopic watch pivots you would be advised to pick up a quality second hand watchmakers lathe.

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hiya, Thanks for getting back to me and the info, I am glad I asked.. I will have a lookout for the Unimat 3, I only want it for clocks pivots, I can't see to do that fine a work on watches..

I bought a box of carriage clock bits of the Bay all mixed up, I managed to fit them all together, 2 very nice cases, 3 movements. One was a Charles Frodsham the barrel is shot and I do mean shot....and had a lovely repair done to it, photo attached if interested, also photo of the pivot I need to repair. And one more case to fixup but that needs a lot of work..

Thanks again Len

 

 

IMG_8044.thumb.JPG.d6cf81f895832d583d331480aaef92df.JPGIMG_8041.thumb.JPG.1f21f9e2a6c516f20d51ba604f305e51.JPGIMG_8037.thumb.JPG.b67d3f0c83dce8ba005258258652c95c.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Definitely inexpensive and meant to turn metal not wood. At least if you believe the product specifications. So you could purchase one from Amazon but more important you can look at the reviews. The phrase you get what you pay for definitely implies here and it looks like you're probably paying too much.

https://www.amazon.com/Signswise-Motorized-Woodworking-Education-Modelmaking/dp/B00UL3J81S#customerReviews

Then here are some ideas for re-pivoting. Even though it's in the watch repair section there isn't any reason why you couldn't scale them up in size to do clocks. The only problem is there are either accessories for a lathe or you really need a lathe to make these.

https://www.watchrepairtalk.com/topic/4474-look-at-that-a-new-toy-diy-pivot-drill/

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Lenj said:

Well I had a look at the Ulimat 3 and that is twice the cost of the one above.

If you see a U3 for 2x that, pounce....but be careful, its likely missing components.   I get that its what its worth to you that matters, but I'm challenged to see how a machine selling for $150 could remotely be satisfactory machining anything accurately and U3's are really nice bench top setup, Austrian made and made well.  Spending $150, getting frustrated and tossing isn't a good outcome either....whereas with U3 it still be worth what you paid for it :)   Currently with 22 lathes from watchmakers to a 5200 lb DSG, I'm big big believer in carefully buying used quality machines as the way to get the best bang for the buck.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

Definitely inexpensive and meant to turn metal not wood. At least if you believe the product specifications. So you could purchase one from Amazon but more important you can look at the reviews. The phrase you get what you pay for definitely implies here and it looks like you're probably paying too much.

https://www.amazon.com/Signswise-Motorized-Woodworking-Education-Modelmaking/dp/B00UL3J81S#customerReviews

Then here are some ideas for re-pivoting. Even though it's in the watch repair section there isn't any reason why you couldn't scale them up in size to do clocks. The only problem is there are either accessories for a lathe or you really need a lathe to make these.

https://www.watchrepairtalk.com/topic/4474-look-at-that-a-new-toy-diy-pivot-drill/

 

Yes you do get what you pay for that's for sure...Thanks for the link, that looks like a good project..

Len

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, measuretwice said:

If you see a U3 for 2x that, pounce....but be careful, its likely missing components.   I get that its what its worth to you that matters, but I'm challenged to see how a machine selling for $150 could remotely be satisfactory machining anything accurately and U3's are really nice bench top setup, Austrian made and made well.  Spending $150, getting frustrated and tossing isn't a good outcome either....whereas with U3 it still be worth what you paid for it :)   Currently with 22 lathes from watchmakers to a 5200 lb DSG, I'm big big believer in carefully buying used quality machines as the way to get the best bang for the buck.

 

 

Hi, thanks for the info..as I said yes you do get what you pay for, but I can't justify that sort of money to do a couple of pivots, I like the home made jobby, that look fun to make..

Len

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 years later...

Hi the best way is using a lathe and drill attachment or a chuck in the tail stock. I made a drilling flag that fits  the tool post and the broken end runs in the guide and the drill is placed through the guide to drill the arbour, I have also used a vertical drill to do the same job with no problem. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I've remained silent on this thread, and at the risk of upsetting everyone, the thing that worries me the most the the apparent absence of Mark. The moderators do a great job and the members also pitch in, and the site seems to run itself, but it is a concern for the future of this forum when the owner is absent for all intents and purposes. Like many of the comments above I would hate to log in one day and things be closed down as I rely on this site for ideas and knowledge and also cheer me up. maybe the Moderators could reach out to him, assuming he does not read this thread, and express our concerns and let us know the plans going forward? some kind of WRT ark
    • That was the exact reason for me starting this thread watchie. Still we haven't worked out how the regulars are going to hook up if it goes tits up. I honestly think something should be arranged to stay in contact, we all help each other so much. 
    • Yeah ive watched that a few times before,  i couldnt find my old school dividers to scribe it up 😅 Yep thats the guy i bought a roll from . Thanks Nicklesilver that answers that perfectly and more or less what i thought an experiment over time would prove . The jumper arm is quite thick along its length, i left it that way intentionally, i thought the original was probably very thin, i didnt see that it was already missing. Setting isn't particularly stiff as such just positive, i still need to take it out and polish where it mates with the stem release. 
    • Yes, "Sold out" is difficult to understand. There doesn't seem to be a lot going on. It's been nine months since any new video was published on the Watch Repair Channel. The Level 4 course on watchfix.com has been in progress for what feels like forever (several years!?). Maybe Mark's enterprises aren't doing well or perhaps already so profitable there's nothing much to motivate him for more material. Or, perhaps these days he's more into crochet. The real reason is probably something entirely different but it would be nice/interesting to know. I don't mean to sound gloomy or pessimistic, but I wouldn't be surprised to be met by an HTTP 404. Every day feels like a gift. Speaking of watchfix.com I've been postponing the "Level 5: Servicing Chronograph Watches" course for a very, very long time. Anyway, I just enrolled on it so it's going to be very interesting to see the videos. I must say, IMO there's nothing really that can compete with Mark's courses when it comes to presentation and video quality. It's simply world-class and makes me associate with some really expensive BBC productions.
    • Steel has some funny properties, or at least counterintuitive. The modulus of elasticity is effectively (not exactly, but close enough) the same for steel that is annealed and hardened. What changes is the point of plastic deformation* . If the movement of your spring doesn't pass that, it should work fine. It looks a little thick, I would thin it a bit maybe from the main body out about halfway, maybe 10-20% thinner (not in thickness, along its form). But if it works it works!   *So- if you have two bars of the same steel, one annealed, one at 600 Vickers (general hardness watch arbors might be), clamp them to a table so the same length is hanging out, and put a weight on the ends, they will bend the same amount. But if you continue to add weight, then remove it, at a point the annealed bar won't return to its original straightness. That's the point of plastic deformation. But up to that point, as springs, they are the same. However- their wear characteristics will be very very different. And getting the hardened bar past its point of plastic deformation takes a lot more effort.
×
×
  • Create New...