Jump to content

Opinions on tools


Recommended Posts

So I recently just tore down a Chinese standard movement(2650s) and it's essentially destroyed now lol. I used the cheapest tools I could find on cousins uk which include a movement holder, screwdrivers, tweezers and a loupe. Do you think I should upgrade my tools to higher quality or use the same tools and try to perfect my technique? I don't want to spend too much on tools, so bergeon is out of the question, so I'm looking at alternatives like AF Switzerland for screwdrivers. I think I might upgrade my movement holder since the indian one is a POS and wobbles on the table. 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Screwdrivers, tweezers, movement holders, and loupes. That is the core of your toolset.

Contrary to popular opinion you don't need to spend much on screwdrivers and tweezers. They can be brought up to scratch with a decent set of stones/diamond laps, and a bit of practice. In fact bringing them up to scratch is a core skill for watchmakers/repairers. The sooner you learn how to do that, the better. So spend some money on decent stones/laps.

Optical magnification and movement holders, however, need to be good from the start. You can't fix substandard versions. Spend the money on some decent stuff up front. Though that doesn't need to be a lot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with @Pango and so, yes, frankly you probably need to practice your technique as much as anything. Getting expensive versions of tools will not prevent you wrecking a movement. 

Cheap screwdriver blades will deteriorate quickly so that purchase on screws is compromised leading to slippage and damage. There's no reason you can't keep your existing handles and just upgrade the blades though. I've always got on well with the A*F Swiss ones. 

My bet is you've got one of the "9mm to 65mm" versions of https://www.cousinsuk.com/product/adjustable# in which case, yes, if you've got, say, a 11.5 ligne movement you're working on then you've got around 60% of the holder not being supported leading to an unbalanced situation. Assuming you'll stick to movements more around the 11.5 ligne range then you could chop off the excess guide and screw rails and also put Rodico (or even BlueTac) on all four feet of the holder; you should find this makes things far more stable.

I have a good movement holder but I often find myself working with one of the rings from the set  https://www.cousinsuk.com/product/07mm-to-50mm-plastic-rings  for some projects; useful doesn't have to be expensive.

And one final comment on magnification. One of my mistakes when I set out was using a loupe with too high a magnification meaning leaning in very close to the movement to work on it. Due to helpful advice on this forum I moved to a headband magnifier to carry out most work. There are professional 'OptiVisor' versions but there are cheaper versions, still using optical glass, which are very good too (look for instance at ebay item 132780644579).

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you're just starting out I wouldn't worry too much about the screwdriver sharpening aspect; decent blades 'out of the box' will be fine. If as you progress you want to start thinking about this then read other forum topics like https://www.watchrepairtalk.com/topic/5292-screwdriver-sharpening/. For the moment I think your time would be better spent learning how to disassemble and reassemble a basic movement.

Tweezers come in an array of sizes and you'll notice numbers (and letters on them) to indicate their style. The suggested purchase you've picked out has a 3 and 3C but these are much the same i.e. thin tipped tweezers. The only real difference is that the 3C has a shorter shank.

As with any engineering skill  people will have personal preferences for tools but for a lot of work on 'normal size' movements (lets take circa 11.5 ligne) I find I use an SS style the most i.e. tweezers with a longer shank and fine tips. As you're starting out my advice therefore would be to get a set of decent tweezers in a variety of styles/sizes and find out which ones you get on better with. I note your link referenced ebay.ca so I'd be suggesting you'd be better off with something like https://www.ebay.ca/itm/6-piece-Epoxy-coated-tweezers-set-st36/262728142056. This gives you a wider range of nice new antimagnetic stainless steel tweezers to start out with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, with regards to cleaning. I had read that I could use lighter fluid and a bit of pegwood to clean the movement since I will probably not have the space to have an ultrasonic cleaner or afford the cleaning chemicals that go along with it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I started off buying all the cheap tools, and have gradually replaced most with better quality.

To save you buying things twice: I would recommend some decent quality screwdrivers. As @WatchMaker suggests, A*F are good qulaity at a reasonable price. I'm very happy with them.

I think it's worth spending on some quality tweezers. I haven't found any cheap ones which have the right tension - critical when handling very small items. I use Dumont #2 stainless steel - about £25 from Cousins. They are about the only pair I use.
But £25 seems crazy for tweezers when others are £2.  Can anyone suggest a 'reasonable quality' cheaper alternative ?

For cleaning, Lighter Fluid, a brush and pegwood work fine. 

 I use a cheap 600 ml Ultrasonic jewelry cleaner (takes very little space - about as big as a brick). I put the parts in small plastic pots, just covered in lighter fluid, then float them in warm water in the cleaner. I then rinse them in Isopropanol (lighter fluid leaves an oily residue).

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/9/2018 at 3:45 PM, seikoskx said:

upgrade my tools to higher quality or use the same tools and try to perfect my technique

It looks like you might be new to watch repair? Are you blaming the quality the tools or the lack of your knowledge for the lack of your success?

The BHI in their horological journal September 2008 has a really nice review on screwdrivers. I'm only going to extract out the final outcome of the review which is really quite amusing. It becomes amusing because they're rating a whole bunch of things not just the screwdrivers themselves. Then if you look carefully there really isn't much difference between all of them. Really what is important is the quality of the screwdriver blades themselves.

So when you're starting you don't have to have the most expensive tools. It's amazing what people can do with lesser grade tools providing they have the skill to use the tools. Obviously if the tools are total crap it doesn't matter how much skill you have. Perhaps a photograph of what you have so we can see what they look like.

Then you started this discussion with one topic you've added in several other topics and if you're hoping for answers to any of those other questions you really should start a new discussion. Then before starting a new discussion it's always helpful to do a search because more than likely we might've already covered some of these things.

 

screwdriver review.JPG

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Someone once said "your tweezers become your hands" since we don't tend to handle parts directly. I own some cheap tweezers and can't imagine having to use them regularly for handling movement parts (or balance cocks!). You need good tweezers in my opinion, preferably something like Dumont. I do dress all of my tweezers, but with the cheaper ones it is a false economy for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thank you so much, Hector and CJ. I appreciate the tech sheet and the video. Gasp, I think I will make the attempt. What's the worst that can happen? I think there may be a new balance complete in my future, though.  I'll update the post and let you know the result. R, Frank  
    • So here is the new base (v 2.1), I made it so that the base will fit over and swallow the stump of the hand pusher tool (or at least my clone of the tool), I also reduced the OD of the bottom skirt a little as it looked/felt a little large, here are a few pictures and the fake .pdf file which you need to convert to .zip once downloaded.   The cut-out seen on the below image on the bottom of the base should swallow the OD (40 mm, +0.1 mm tolerance) of the stump and the height of the stump 9.5mm (measured to 9.1mm, but rounded to 9.5mm) - let me know if this works for your tool.   Note, I think you may need to print supports for the new internal shelf created? Here is the fake .pdf for just the FreeCAD base file and 3mf files Modular Movement Holder.pdf Here is the fake pdf for complete set of the new base and ring FreeCAD/3mf files: Modular Movement Holder base and ring v 2.1.pdf However, I'm wondering how often you could use this feature, adding the dial usually increases the OD of the movement, so you would need a new (larger) adapter ring tuned to the OD of the dial and I wouldn't like to grip the dial in any kind of movement holder if It could be avoided for fear of damaging it. Maybe I'm misunderstanding you?
    • Hi Frank, you have dived headlong into the deep end. Hairspring work has to be the scariest thing a newbie has to tackle. Your hairspring appears to be bent and just putting it back into the regulator would not allow the balance to work properly. It might start oscillating but the performance would not be good. The proper thing to do is to unstud the hairspring, remove the hairspring from the balance, reinstall the hairspring on the stud carrier, reshape the endcurve and centre the collet to the balance jewel hole. This challenge would either make you or break you. Hope that you will be able to fix your watch. Welcome to the world of watchmaking.  Watch this video. It think it'll give you an idea of the task ahead. From your 1st photo, I think you have a etachron type stud. Let me see if I can find a video on how to remove it from the arm.
    • Have read of the Tech Sheet attached on the balance section page 12. It may be bent but until you reposition it back in the regulator pins you'll never know. Cheers CJ 4R35B_4R36A.pdf
    • Aloha All, My Seiko 4R35B movement stopped working today. Upon closer inspection, it looks like the balance spring came out of the regulator pin. This is my first time working on a balance. Any advice on how to get this spring repositioned (back to normal)? I'm pretty sure that while adjusting the beat error on this movement, I must have turned the stud (I didn't even know they turned), and the spring eventually fell out.  Will the spring go back to even spacing when it's back in the pin, or does it look bent? Thanks, Frank  
×
×
  • Create New...