Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi all,  I recently aquired this seiko racing chronometer, have not seen one like it on internet or seiko site, whish raises doubt as to it's genuineness. Anybody seen one? Did seiko make racing chronometeres.

Seiko probably added such complications as chronometers on watches more than any other watchmaker. So wouldn,t have rivaled it's own product by making racing chronometers.

IMG-20181008-WA0009.jpg

IMG-20181008-WA0008.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, oldhippy said:

I would say its genuine. Seiko do make them. There are many photos on the web. Here is one very much like the one you have.

 

130246328.jpg

Much appreciate your response and good news,  Sir. 

Regards joe

 

Posted
9 hours ago, Nucejoe said:

seiko racing chronometer

Yes I realize I'm splitting hairs here but I object to the word chronometer. Classically I think of a chronometer as a ships clock with a Detent escapement. Then a course today they refer to precision timekeeping watches as chronometers.

Then the pictures online for the Seiko Stopwatch 88-5021 All look identical to yours with an exception?  The exception is yours looks absolutely brand-new and the ones online do not. Then you even have the tag which is nice.

Then because I like seeing naked movements I found you video of the inside

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k5C7qmllyFg

 

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 hour ago, JohnR725 said:

Yes I realize I'm splitting hairs here but I object to the word chronometer. Classically I think of a chronometer as a ships clock with a Detent escapement. Then a course today they refer to precision timekeeping watches as chronometers.

Then the pictures online for the Seiko Stopwatch 88-5021 All look identical to yours with an exception?  The exception is yours looks absolutely brand-new and the ones online do not. Then you even have the tag which is nice.

Then because I like seeing naked movements I found you video of the inside

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k5C7qmllyFg

 

 

 

Thanks for your descriptive  response, good news and the research you have done. 

Regards joe

Posted

That's a very nice stopwatch that you have acquired Joe.  It should be described as a chronograph not a chronometer.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
4 hours ago, JohnR725 said:
9 minutes ago, Geo said:

That's a very nice stopwatch that you have acquired Joe.  It should be described as a chronograph not a chronometer.

I see it also adds up the second, right a chronograph. You forgot to comment on genuineness.My web access is limited, So askng the fellow forumers seemed best option. Thanks for your response and then correction you made.

 

 

Thanks for your descriptive  response, good news and the research you have done. 

Regards joe

Posted
24 minutes ago, Geo said:

That's a very nice stopwatch that you have acquired Joe.  It should be described as a chronograph not a chronometer.

Do you fly them sesna? Departure stalls always made me want to quit flying.:mad:

Regards joe

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thanks for that Andy, Yes the new bracelet is worth more than the watch itself, Its one I have bought to service and clean-up and on-sell it as a project, look it may sell to someone who has a small wrist, I think I will buy an extender and may-be offer it up with a normal strap as well CJ
    • Not always that simple. Typically the only reason we would have any way of identifying a watch is if parts were available at any time and somebody had a parts reference book then they would help you to identify the watches that they have parts or. Unfortunately there are hundreds of thousands of watch movements with no identification and of course typically no parts the classic place were watches would be identified would be under the balance wheel and your pictures don't really show a good view of that. Occasionally I've seen watches marked under one of the plates. They felt very proud of their watch is a very prominent Swiss company and they ask he stamped the bottom of a plate so you have disassembled find it. Then there is the other system the keyless parts make up something called the fingerprint system but you still haven't given us enough information to make use of that. Here's an image showing what a fingerprint system looks like. The PDF is based on the physical book the physical book has sizes of watches these are smaller ladies watches and keyless parts which in the physical book are printed at the actual size of the watch parts. So to identify with the keyless we need in your case diameter measured on the dial side and a good picture of the keyless parts and then you have to hope that this was made within the right time span of the books that have this system on the other hand a lot of times on the dial side they will also put markings. So basically to identify a movement it has to come out of the case and has to be disassembled.
    • The strap is a 44Q6JB and hadn't realised how much they'd gone up in price. The used one I've got is very worn but may have other links floating around.
    • @Mercurial is this also a variation of the tool you posted? 
    • Thanks Andy, The bracelet is sized very small, around a 14cm wrist. Were would one try to source original links, I guess they wouldn't be cheap if found. The bracelet end links have 4406 B-E stamped on them, is this the Seiko Bracelet code ?? CJ  
×
×
  • Create New...