Jump to content

Hole ended mainspring


LiamB

Recommended Posts

Hello, I need to replace a mainspring in a Waltham pocket watch and have revived a new spring inside of one of those rings. However the mainspring is a hole end and I have no idea how to get it to engage with the hook when installing it into the barrel. I have only installed Swiss mainsprings before. 

Any help would be greatly appreciated! 

Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You should push the spring in like any other, but it can be a little tricky to align the hole with the barrel hook because as the spring expands into the barrel it will tend to unwind slightly.

I find that it is best to turn the spring slightly so the hook lines up just past the edge of the hole in the spring (towards the coiled spring, not the spring end) before fitting.  As the spring is wound up it will then tend to align naturally with the barrel hook if it wasn’t quite there after fitting. Clearly if the hole starts the other side of the hook you would need it to slip a complete turn when winding to catch on the hook.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

  often,  on a vintage pocket watch,  you will find that the main spring had been  shortened rather than replaced.  this requires you to aneal the "hook end"  before broaching a hole or making a "fold".   there are several other potential problems for a "first time" mainspring replacement on a vintage watch.   this very good forum can adress them.  vin

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is this a modern replacement spring or a original spring?

I'm attaching an image this is an original waltham spring and it's shaped different than a modern spring. So to hook into the steel barrels typically found on waltham watches ideally the mainspring should look like the image. The modern spring will just have a hole and it usually will never catch. Then if you look where the bend is you'll notice that the hole edge has a taper that is to wedge into the protruding part of the barrel. So you can try shoving your modern spring in but usually that will not work at the minimum you need to file the taper.

 

Waltham mainspring.JPG

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/7/2018 at 3:49 AM, StuartBaker104 said:

You should push the spring in like any other, but it can be a little tricky to align the hole with the barrel hook because as the spring expands into the barrel it will tend to unwind slightly.

I find that it is best to turn the spring slightly so the hook lines up just past the edge of the hole in the spring (towards the coiled spring, not the spring end) before fitting.  As the spring is wound up it will then tend to align naturally with the barrel hook if it wasn’t quite there after fitting. Clearly if the hole starts the other side of the hook you would need it to slip a complete turn when winding to catch on the hook.

 

Thanks, that method worked very well. The spring slipped right in place!

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That's very interesting information. I haven't tried to see if my bombé jewel holes have olive holes but I think I should be able to tell on the larger jewels at least. See if I get a chance to have a look later today. This little story was very comforting to read for a "bungler" like myself. That success isn't a given even for a pro. Thanks for sharing!
    • I forgot that I said I would do that. Will take some tomorrow and post them up post haste.
    • I've seen some really nice early 20th century pieces where all the jewels, including center wheel, were convex. Definitely to reduce friction. It can be quite hard to tell if a jewel has olive holes, especially on small sizes, but that again reduces friction- as well as accommodates small misalignments better. Why they aren't used more often? I imagine it was found that at a certain point in the train the actual advantage became negligible, and the added cost on high production movements is why it's not seen on those, just higher-end pieces.   I did an experiment on a little 5x7"' AS 1012 a few years back. These things run OK sometimes, but often are absolute dogs. And AS made gajillions of them. I had a NOS novelty watch in for a service, ran OK flat, massive drop in amplitude vertical. Made like 3 staffs for it trying different pivot sizes, no change. Tried high quality (not Seitz) convex/olive jewels, no change- the original were flat, but could have been olive hole. Same for the pallet fork, then escape wheel, no change. Probably had 20 hours in the watch, new staff and new hole jewels through the escape wheel, no difference in running. Just a dog of a movement. But if I were making a watch I would use them, just because.
    • When Nicklesilver mentioned the use of them on non coned pivots on older high end watches closer to the escapement.  That suggested to me  probably fourth wheels and possibly third wheels. The square shoulder rotatating on the much smaller surface area of a dome as opposed to a flat jewel surface. I'm curious as to why they are not used predominantly?
    • That's what I thought, but as I said, it makes sense. See if any of our pros will have something to add.
×
×
  • Create New...