Jump to content

Stem loose, but could this be a scam?


Recommended Posts

A few days ago a friend of mine called and asked me if I could take a look at his wife’s mechanical watch as the stem had come loose. Having serviced some 15 or so mechanical Vostoks and Poljots, two Unitas 6498, and most recently an ETA 1080 I felt pretty confident I might be able to find and fix the problem.

According to my friend they’d bought the watch on their holiday in San Mario and had paid a little less than €300 Euro. Considering the price and my experience so far, my guess was that the watch would probably have a pretty standard 17 jewel mechanical movement, and furthermore that a likely cause might be a dislocated setting lever. So, I decided to take on the challenge.

A few days later I had the watch in my hands and below is what it looked like:

30200354577_e21fd4ea36_o.jpg

31264556198_5f735cfc4a_o.jpg
As you can see it’s a skeleton watch. Never worked on any of those before but I’d assume they just have less metal than a normal movement. Anyway, after having removed the snap on case back lid I felt quite disconcerted. I couldn’t figure out how to remove the movement from the case as I couldn’t find any movement fixing ring screws. Furthermore, it seemed to be fitted with wheels serving no purpose, and the setting lever push screw (which I’m not even sure it was) just wouldn’t budge one bit when I tried to press and/or move it a bit. As far as I could tell, the dial seemed fitted on the case and not on the dial. And funny there’s a print on the crystal (never saw that before). The overall design felt very "different" to what I had seen before.

So, I don’t know what to make out of this and would really like to hear your opinions about this watch and if you think there’s something I can do to repair it. I do not have a lot of experience but this watch makes something of a “toyish” impression on me and I feel confused. Could it be a “scam watch”? If I can't get it out of the case (I've tried to lift it with quite a bit of force) there's nothing much I can do, is there?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To me this watch screams to keep your hands off  !!! ....... you have no idea how many Gremlins this watch has?

My honest advice; Return this watch to your friend saying it's above your abilities / capabilities. There is nothing wrong with that.

Better returning the watch as it is, than returning a plastic bag full of parts and a "I'm sorry".

Better be safe than sorry .....

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And there is/was nothing wrong with your gut feeling ;)

I had a similar experience with an antique (+/- 1730) clock I was asked to have a look at ....... skip to the end if you thinks it's too long or boring (however it's interesting to read how the story develops / changes every time new information surfaced)

https://www.watchrepairtalk.com/topic/7826-tools-required-for-an-antique-long-case/?page=2

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe not a fake watch. But does looks like it's badly made. i should say it's junk and i am sorry for your friend that he paid that kind of money for that. Bye him a nice vintage watch from Tradera and  service it for him instead. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have no idea what it is, but it's like with the old clock were multiple people through the centuries worked on, you have no idea what has been done and what is hidden. Once you start on it, you are completely on your own. There is no reference, no documentation and most likely nobody on this forum can help you.

I don't think you need to beg to be excused. It requires wisdom to know where your limits are; to know what you can do and can't do. That can only be respected.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks, guys! I felt slightly bad about this at first, but having read your posts I will simply return it to the owner telling him I'm just not up to it. He knows I'm not a professional, and I was very careful not to make any promises, so we should be fine. After that, I will just simply forget about this "incident".

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Geo said:

I would love to have a go at fixing that................only if It was mine and had paid a couple of bob for it.

If the owner no longer wants it I can send it to you. In that case, I'll get in touch with you. Then, perhaps you can share the experience with us, whatever the outcome!? I'm sure we could all learn something. Of course, you'd get to keep the watch as yours!

I will, as gently as possible, recommend the owner not to spend any money on repair but rather, as rogart63 suggested, recommend a nice mechanical vintage watch for his wife which I could help him service.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A quick scan through the Seagull catalogue at Cousins suggests this is a TY2721; would need to confirm the size at 26mm to be more certain. They don’t carry it in stock but will quote if you ask - likely to be about £30. Spare parts will not be available, and I would say €300 is about 3 or 4 times what this watch is worth.

There is an auto version of this movement, and the unused wheels are likely part of the auto mechansim.

The upside to a skeleton movement is that you should be able to see all of the parts of the keyless works clearly while the movement is still in the case. You describe the problem as being that the stem is loose. Do you mean it comes out completely? If so, what do you see on the dial side if you try to push it back in? What type of crystal does this have? Can it be easily emoved to give access to the keyless works?

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, StuartBaker104 said:

A quick scan through the Seagull catalogue at Cousins suggests this is a TY2721; would need to confirm the size at 26mm to be more certain. They don’t carry it in stock but will quote if you ask - likely to be about £30. Spare parts will not be available, and I would say €300 is about 3 or 4 times what this watch is worth.

There is an auto version of this movement, and the unused wheels are likely part of the auto mechansim.

The upside to a skeleton movement is that you should be able to see all of the parts of the keyless works clearly while the movement is still in the case. You describe the problem as being that the stem is loose. Do you mean it comes out completely? If so, what do you see on the dial side if you try to push it back in? What type of crystal does this have? Can it be easily emoved to give access to the keyless works?

 

 

Thanks for the info!

Yes, the stem comes out completely! Looking at the dial side pushing the stem back in there's no motion in any of the parts except the sliding clutch/pinion which rotates but doesn't reach the crown wheel. The crystal feels like glass and lies flat with the case. I was considering trying to remove it, but don't know if it's possible or how.

Anyway, I feel I'm done with this watch...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like the same movement they put in rotary watches, have a look on ebay and you will find them, i have one here, another job I had, apparently the owner fell over, in doing so then top plate got bent balance staff snapped hands fell off!!! I just bought a complete rotary watch off the bay for around £15 and swapped the movements.

But I would take others advise and return it, im doing the exact same thing on a fussee pocket watch that is beyond me at the moment, the other pocket watch they gave me is giving me so much grief wish I hadn't taken it on either but there you go.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please forgive me if I get the nomenclature wrong.The plunger which you pointed out should of course move.It may be immobilized by corrosion.If it is stuck in a downward position it would not allow the little protrusion that engages the stem and retains it in the movement to do it's job.Other than that you are looking at parts breakage.I wouldn't do anything other than apply the smallest drop of penetrating oil to the plunger.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Put the movement in a movement holder and it will be supported as you push down on the setting lever post to release the winding stem. Make sure the post is over the shoulder of the movement holder so what you are pressing down on is supported. As a general rule, hold the movement and not the movement holder. Replace the hands when the movement isn't in the case and support the centre jewel (if it has one) on a hard surface or staking block when replacing the hands to stop the jewel accidentally moving or even coming out. A dedicated movement holder with a central jewel support is even better, but pricey
    • It might help us if we knew which watch like model number.
    • Hi, guys I have a bit of a predicament and hopefully, somebody can advise. I'm working on a Roamer MST 521 where the movement is extracted from the crystal side. I'm now at the final hurdle where I need to replace the movement back into its case but I'm not sure of the correct procedure. I still need to fit the hands but that's where the problem lies. If I insert the winding stem to test the hands for correct alignment I will need to turn the movement over to release the stem again it's the spring-loaded type and needs a small bit of force to push down but with the hands fitted, I don't think I can do this on a cushion without causing some damage to the hands and that's the last thing I want to do, this watch has already been a love-hate relationship and I'm so close to boxing this one off which I'm counting as my first major project.  The other option is to case the movement then fit the hands and hope everything is okay. I've already broken the original winding stem but managed to find a replacement, the last one in stock, so I'm a bit reluctant to keep removing it. Any suggestions would be appreciated. 
    • I would go for the dearer spring. You won't need to remove the spring from the carrier ring and then use a mainspring winder to get it into the barrel, for a start. Also that spring is closer to the needed dimensions, especially the length. The length plays a part in the mainsprings strength. If you double the length you will half the force (strength) of the spring and vice-versa. A spring with 20 mm less length would be about 7% shorter, so technically would be 7% more strength, but I find halving this number is closer to real-world findings, so the spring would be about 3 to 4% more strength/force. On a mainspring that ideally kicks out 300 degrees of amplitude, a 3% increase in amplitude would be 309 degrees. Increasing or decreasing the length of the mainspring will affect the power reserve to a greater or lesser degree. It depends how much shorter or longer it is. I've attached a lesson regarding mainsprings, focussing on the size and strength of the spring within the barrel, you might find helpful. Unfortunately it is a PDF converted from a PowerPoint presentation, but only a slide was lost that was originally a video of fitting a mainspring   Lesson 5 The mainspring.pdf
×
×
  • Create New...