Jump to content

Revue MSR T43 Canon Pinnion adjustment - it doesn't have one !


Recommended Posts

This MSR T43 movement puzzled me as there is no cannon pinion. 

Cleaned and re-assembled it runs nicely, but the minute hand slips slightly, and it's pretty loose changing time. 

A bit of investigation found that part 207 in the picture is called 'Minute pinion with tube' and does the job of the cannon pinion.

I didn't know this when I cleaned the movement, so I want to take it apart - just pushing tweezers in to the gap isn't doing it.

Any ideas how to separate it ?

It's going to be a bit delicate to adjust, I haven't tried tightening pinions, and this is a small part.

 

 

20180901_155934.jpg

WIN_20181006_12_50_13_Pro.jpg

WIN_20181006_12_47_38_Pro.jpg

Untitled.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, clockboy said:

That's a new one for me. Can to adjust the pinion without separating it. I use a anvil type stump with my jeweling tool. You just need to achieve a little friction. 

I think I'll do that. As it's a bit loose I guess there's no point trying to split it to clean it.

I'll try using one of the fine pushers in my jeweling tool.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you try to increase the friction mounted you'll actually decrease it. Really.

There's a special tool for separating these (I'll post a pic when I'm back in the shop Monday) but minus that you can grab them with thin tweezers in the middle and slide them up using them as a pair of wedges.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, WatchMaker said:

I had an issue with this type of movement (a T56) last year ... you might be interested to read this posting: https://www.watchrepairtalk.com/topic/7678-msr-t56-hands-not-moving-advice-please/

Mine was an odd situation and a double whammy (slipping hand caused by cannon pinion and slightly loose hand).

Let us know how you get on.

The cannon pinion was loose. I managed to split it by pushing it up the tweezers using some pegwood. Then the scary task of trying to tighten it - my first. 

I shoved a broach up it,  but the only tool in the staking set pointy enough was the thing used to centre the holes. One (very nervous) tap with the hammer and :woohoo-jumping-smiley-emoticon:. The friction moving the hands seemed perfect. 

Left the watch running for a couple of hours ..... and the minute hand had slipped a minute. A few minutes later I spotted your response. A lateral push on the minute hand showed it to be very loose.

Or I thought it was. A closer look shows the hand is not slipping, but there is some play - must be the gears. I need to get the dial off for another look.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The cannon pinion was loose. I managed to split it by pushing it up the tweezers using some pegwood. Then the scary task of trying to tighten it - my first. 
I shoved a broach up it,  but the only tool in the staking set pointy enough was the thing used to centre the holes. One (very nervous) tap with the hammer and :woohoo-jumping-smiley-emoticon:. The friction moving the hands seemed perfect. 
Left the watch running for a couple of hours ..... and the minute hand had slipped a minute. A few minutes later I spotted your response. A lateral push on the minute hand showed it to be very loose.
Or I thought it was. A closer look shows the hand is not slipping, but there is some play - must be the gears. I need to get the dial off for another look.
There's always some backlash in the gears (except for some rare antibacklash gearing in a very few modern pieces). Try setting clockwise on the last movement of the hands.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, nickelsilver said:

Here's the puller (more of a "separator"). Not sure if anyone still sells them, but if you see one you'll know what it is.

20181008_135517 (Large).jpg

20181008_135542 (Large).jpg

Don't remember seeing one on ebay, but now I'll know what to look out for 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/7/2018 at 5:16 PM, WatchMaker said:

I had an issue with this type of movement (a T56) last year ... you might be interested to read this posting: https://www.watchrepairtalk.com/topic/7678-msr-t56-hands-not-moving-advice-please/

Mine was an odd situation and a double whammy (slipping hand caused by cannon pinion and slightly loose hand).

Let us know how you get on.

Hi @WatchMaker. Do you have any pics of the movement. I think I might be missing a spring !

The pic I found shows parts 476 minute wheel spring and 476.1 minute wheel spring holder - neither of which I have.

There is a bit of movement in the minute wheel - it does look like it needs a spring to hold it in place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi @mikepilk - yes there should be a spring here.

I've searched back through photos I've taken and fortunately I've found one that should help as attached. This is when I was trying to fathom why my hands weren't turning ... hence the temporary blue dot on the minute wheel. :)

I'm not sure if your parts diagram is misleading. So whilst, yes, there should be a spring (476) I certainly do not recall any separate spring holder (476.1). Are you referencing the 'Revue GT44' sheet which, whilst I appreciate is based on the MSR T43 series, might have subtle differences? If I look at the base plate in your diagram for instance there is a very clear hole / gap in the region above where the minute wheel would go ... but on my base plate this was all solid metal. The recess the spring would go in my base plate was essentially a capsule shaped recess i.e. an 'inbuilt' spring holder rather than a separate part.  If you look at the data sheet on the Cousins site (at https://www.cousinsuk.com/PDF/categories/6295_MSR T43.pdf) this would seem to confirm with only a 476 referenced.

What is your base plate like? Assuming it is T43-like-solid I'm happy to get the spare T-series movement I have in my collection and disassemble around this region to give you a close up of the spring so you can get a (better) idea. From memory it is not quite the shape shown in your diagram and had a simpler profile with the spring providing just a modicum of tension on the minute wheel.

T56 spring.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, WatchMaker said:

Hi @mikepilk - yes there should be a spring here.

I've searched back through photos I've taken and fortunately I've found one that should help as attached. This is when I was trying to fathom why my hands weren't turning ... hence the temporary blue dot on the minute wheel. :)

I'm not sure if your parts diagram is misleading. So whilst, yes, there should be a spring (476) I certainly do not recall any separate spring holder (476.1). Are you referencing the 'Revue GT44' sheet which, whilst I appreciate is based on the MSR T43 series, might have subtle differences? If I look at the base plate in your diagram for instance there is a very clear hole / gap in the region above where the minute wheel would go ... but on my base plate this was all solid metal. The recess the spring would go in my base plate was essentially a capsule shaped recess i.e. an 'inbuilt' spring holder rather than a separate part.  If you look at the data sheet on the Cousins site (at https://www.cousinsuk.com/PDF/categories/6295_MSR T43.pdf) this would seem to confirm with only a 476 referenced.

What is your base plate like? Assuming it is T43-like-solid I'm happy to get the spare T-series movement I have in my collection and disassemble around this region to give you a close up of the spring so you can get a (better) idea. From memory it is not quite the shape shown in your diagram and had a simpler profile with the spring providing just a modicum of tension on the minute wheel.

T56 spring.JPG

I managed find a suitable spring to fit in the cut-out without needing any holding - you can see the cut-out in the pic I posted above. 

Maybe I need a slightly stronger spring as the minute hand doesn't always quite line up with the markers on the dial - sometimes a fraction behind, sometimes a fraction ahead !

It's an odd movement. I've never had such problems with the motion works. It's always been the balance/gear train- which are fine. 

I'm getting good amplitude and it's keeping very good time.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry @mikepilk - the device I was looking on put that movement diagram front and centre and I hadn't scrolled up a little to see the very clear pictures of your actual movement too! Oops!

That's what I was checking though and, so yes, you have the capsule shaped recess for the spring. There is then definitely no separate spring holder. I've used your picture to draw in the spring profile as I remember it and attach this pic i.e. the spring just providing a pretty light touch to the minute wheel.

I had a lot of problems with this movement type too.  With hands slipping I even took a cannon pinion from a 'spare', and fully working, T43 to put in my T56 but this didn't cure things! Grr! I put a conclusion to why this might have been in my earlier posting I referenced; it seems that separate cannon pinion is a tricky number. I resorted to dots on wheels and monitoring to isolate the issues (plural) I was having. I'm here for moral support if you need it! :blink:

To cheer you up I also attach a pic of my T56 based Revue which, I'm glad to say, was eventually fixed! Sounds like you're almost there too! :thumbsu:

T56 spring.png

Revue Sea Eagle - MSR T56.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, WatchMaker said:

Sorry @mikepilk - the device I was looking on put that movement diagram front and centre and I hadn't scrolled up a little to see the very clear pictures of your actual movement too! Oops!

That's what I was checking though and, so yes, you have the capsule shaped recess for the spring. There is then definitely no separate spring holder. I've used your picture to draw in the spring profile as I remember it and attach this pic i.e. the spring just providing a pretty light touch to the minute wheel.

I had a lot of problems with this movement type too.  With hands slipping I even took a cannon pinion from a 'spare', and fully working, T43 to put in my T56 but this didn't cure things! Grr! I put a conclusion to why this might have been in my earlier posting I referenced; it seems that separate cannon pinion is a tricky number. I resorted to dots on wheels and monitoring to isolate the issues (plural) I was having. I'm here for moral support if you need it! :blink:

To cheer you up I also attach a pic of my T56 based Revue which, I'm glad to say, was eventually fixed! Sounds like you're almost there too! :thumbsu:

T56 spring.png

Revue Sea Eagle - MSR T56.jpg

Looks good 

Funny that we should both have very similar problems. Maybe that's why there aren't many of these movements around? 

I think mine's good enough. I'm not going to mess any more unless I have too. I'll see after a couple of days wearing it.

I was looking for Revue movements after I was so impressed with the quality of the first one I got, a Cal 59 (pics below). All the parts just fitted together so well - lovely engineering.

Maybe the MSR aren't quite as good ?

20181014_123755.jpg

20180805_154510(1).jpg

20180805_154547.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We seem to share very similar tastes! 

I have other Revue movement based watches and even had a small pocket watch movement I'd acquired that seemed too good to just sit in a drawer so I created my own wrist watch with it ... pic attached.  

MSR (Manufactures d'Horlogerie Suisses Reunies) was actually formed  in 1961 when four watch companies decided to join forces. These were Revue Thommen, Vulcain, Phénix and Buser (with Vertex and Marvin joining the MSR fold later). Which of this consortium designed our T43/T56 I'm unsure but I think the quality is still there. I'm of the opinion they were perhaps trying to have some USP and designing in something a bit different because of this! Of course we'd both rather they hadn't but we want things to be a bit challenging...! <_<

Vertex.JPG

Edited by WatchMaker
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If frank says these bombè jewels are for balances and similar pivots then they are used cupped side facing the pivot and then capped i assume. In Nicklesilver's reply i guess that cup can also be reversed and used as an oil reservoir leaving the shoulder riding on a less frictioned domed surface. 🤷‍♂️ Hence the use of them on wheels closer to the escapement that have less torque requiring efforts to reduce friction and are also uncapped.
    • Looks that way, if it had any amount of significant jewel count it would say so on the dial.    Looks that way, if it had any amount of significant jewel count it would say so on the dial.  Same answer as Mike regarding the dial, its often just a slapped on name of a retailer but i thought you were way above this understanding Pete ?
    • Light naptha is what you need to be looking for. The carbon to hydrogen ratio is high with heavy naptha, it doesn't evaporate as well as light naptha and is prone to leaving more residue. Try tom's suggestion of the mirror test.
    • Its a big item Michael and a lot that could go wrong with the process of getting it to its new location. I once helped install one of these units into a conservatory that i had built. It was big and bloody heavy and took six of us to get it in safely. If you have sliding doors and you need to remove the whole frame then that may or may not go well. But i would advise getting a professional in if you have little knowledge on the installation of them. The glazing of the doors could well be 6mm laminated glass which again will be heavy very heavy if the glazing units are big. The glass would also need to be set up and packed correctly to open the doors properly more so if they are unframed and the sliders are upvc. Seems a shame but if no one is biting and that may be due to having no warranty i guess the only takers might be someone that installs them for a living and knows how to repair. If its fibreglass just be careful, i sometimes have to cut fibreglass baths out and they are nasty to work with . Thick gloves are definitely recommended,  not fun picking out fibreglass spells two days later that have started to go septic. Good luck with it all matey.
    • I don’t know anything about this product, however assuming you have it if you put a drop on a mirror or piece of glass lying flat on a table and leave it to evaporate if it leaves any sort of residue it is not really suitable for watch part cleaning.   Tom
×
×
  • Create New...