Jump to content

screw on back vs snap on back


dwhite

Recommended Posts

Is there any way to tell if a back is screw on or snap on?  I know many snap on have a relief to get a knife in but I have heard some  don't.  Most screw on backs I  have seen have lugs to get something like  a jaxa tool  in but I understand there are some that are completely smooth like the old pocket watches.  I've got a few watches I'm unsure of so I thought I would ask.  Thanks!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you don't have the usual tells, it can be tough. I just spent days fighting with a caseback on a pocket watch that I was sure had to be screw off, but I've come to the conclusion it wasn't meant to come off at all.

Information on the specific watches would help.

If you know how old they are, that can help inform things. Earlier than the 80's or so (I'm not an expert so don't use this as a hard date) screw backs were pretty rare. Especially on cheaper watches like Timex, those are almost always snap backs, or you have to pop the crystal and go in from the front.

If the back splits the crown with the front, it's almost certainly a snap back, as the movement is meant to be removed from the case without taking the stem out.

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, qhartman said:

If you don't have the usual tells, it can be tough. I just spent days fighting with a caseback on a pocket watch that I was sure had to be screw off, but I've come to the conclusion it wasn't meant to come off at all.

Information on the specific watches would help.

If you know how old they are, that can help inform things. Earlier than the 80's or so (I'm not an expert so don't use this as a hard date) screw backs were pretty rare. Especially on cheaper watches like Timex, those are almost always snap backs, or you have to pop the crystal and go in from the front.

If the back splits the crown with the front, it's almost certainly a snap back, as the movement is meant to be removed from the case without taking the stem out.

 

Thanks!  I feel better now as all of the watches I'm wondering about are from the 60s.  How in the world would you take a movement out from the top?  If you remove the crystal aren't you just presented with the dial with no way to loosen the screw to take out the stem?  I'm trying to imagine how one would do this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks!  I feel better now as all of the watches I'm wondering about are from the 60s.  How in the world would you take a movement out from the top?  If you remove the crystal aren't you just presented with the dial with no way to loosen the screw to take out the stem?  I'm trying to imagine how one would do this.
It will depend on the watch. Usually watches put together this way have a two part stem. More detail: http://watchfix.info/Battery%20Replacement/One%20Piece%20Case/Battery%20Change%20on%20a%201%20piece%20case.php

Sent from my ONEPLUS A5000 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, qhartman said:

It will depend on the watch. Usually watches put together this way have a two part stem. More detail: http://watchfix.info/Battery%20Replacement/One%20Piece%20Case/Battery%20Change%20on%20a%201%20piece%20case.php

Sent from my ONEPLUS A5000 using Tapatalk
 

Thanks, I bookmarked this page.  I messed up an old watch that had a two piece stem.  I tried to pull it out using advice I read here.  I had to use a ton of force, turns out the two pieces were rusted together.  I  bent up the  stem tube.  Are these  soldered in?  I have an assortment of tubes but no idea how to  remove one and install another.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, qhartman said:

If you know how old they are, that can help inform things. Earlier than the 80's or so (I'm not an expert so don't use this as a hard date) screw backs were pretty rare. Especially on cheaper watches like Timex, those are almost always snap backs, or you have to pop the crystal and go in from the front.

 

Screw down backs have been around for quite some time and can be found on both high and low end makers.  Of course Rolex is a leader in this area as they developed the "oyster case".  

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Screw down backs have been around for quite some time and can be found on both high and low end makers.  Of course Rolex is a leader in this area as they developed the "oyster case".  
 
Ok. I've never seen it on the lower end stuff of that era, except pocket watches.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A5000 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • in general this shouldn't be any change. but in general questions like this it be nice to know the specifics of the watch in other words how was it performing before it was cased up and what is it doing now.
    • just as a reminder this watch is a Swatch group product. This will bring up a problem like spare parts and technical information. that I found some links to some information on when I talk about your watch and some of the technical and basically your watch is equivalent to 2834-2 for which I'm attaching the technical sheets. But equivalent does not mean exactly the same you want to do a search on the group for C07 as we discussed this watch before including the technical differences how it's supposed to be regulated and basically because it's watch group there is no parts availability. https://calibercorner.com/eta-caliber-c07-xxx/   https://www.chrono24.com/magazine/eta-movements-from-the-2824-2-to-the-powermatic-80-p_80840/ https://www.watchuseek.com/threads/h-10-movement-details.4636991/ eta CT_2834-2_FDE_481857_15.pdf
    • people be honest.... Swatch is evil for the watchmakers and repairers, BUT not everything in watches from Switzerland is from the Swatch-Group. As far as i know, Selitta got sacked by Swatch as a Movement-Assembler for them and they started to produce Movements in their own Name with slight Modifications. As far as i know, they sell Parts to the Market for their Movements. In most cases, if a ETA-Movement fails, it is a valid Option to replace it with a Selitta Movement, which i consider the Solution for this Mess with the Swatch-Group...... I have no Connection to anybody at Selitta, but being a Swiss-Guy, i still like to have Swiss-Made Watches, but not from the Swatch-Group.   ok ? regards, Ernst
    • Just one more greedy act by Swatch. They started a number of years ago here in the US..cutting off supplies to watchmakers that could build complications that many Swatch houses couldn't even touch. Old school masters who had gone through some of the most prestigious houses in the world. Otto Frei has some statements on their page about it. I tell all my customers to avoid new Swiss watches like the plague,..unless they just want an older one in their collection that still has some parts out on the market, or they have really deep pockets and don't mind waiting months and paying through the nose to get it back. Plenty of others to choose from..IE Seiko,..or other non-swiss brands Even a number of Chinese brands are catching up with the Swiss,..and I think that in time, their actions will be their downfall
    • Yes. If that's not what you are experiencing...start looking for something rubbing. A 1st guess is that one of the hands is rubbing against the hole in the center of the dial. Especially if you now have lower amplitude in face up/ face down positions.
×
×
  • Create New...