Jump to content

Hour marker paint inquiry,Seamaster 684 ,586.0089


Omegatok5

Recommended Posts

Hello all,im new at trying to fix watches. This is my third attempt as my previous watches where so rusted internally that it wasnt worth it.But I recently got a Ladies Seamaster Automatic 684, 586.0089 1976 (according to the Omega web portal).

I was curious if anybody knew what the paint or material that is on the hour markers is??And if it was available somewhere to buy? or is it an obsolete way of face dial design? Since under a loop it has the appearance of sand glued on metal slivers. Can it be that the original paint degraded over the decades?

Sorry I couldn’t get really up close images.

Thank you for all the wisdom for this beginner,mario.

 

 

F15D266F-187A-4E0C-B9BA-C9D9B12EBFF5.jpeg

183473D6-A2A9-451C-8D85-6C9C0B738962.jpeg

7FF429C4-EFE4-462B-A0D3-0A70A79E81FC.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, morningtundra said:

In 1976, lume material would have been tritium and phosphorus. But then I believe the dial at 6 o’clock would have been marked T Swiss T. Is that UV light in the third pic that makes it look purple?

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

 

Hi Morningtundra , Ty for the reply. The third pic has a white LED as a light source, so the image did turn a bit purple. I took the pic through a loop with a light attachment. About the face dial being marked T for using that material of Tritium and phosphorus, yeah it would be looking different indeed. My question came about my original wonderment as what is the material used in this dial face (hour markers) . As if you can see the 5 o'clock hr marker is like coated with that black "paint" AND what looks like white residue paint..the only marker with it on top. The other markers have this white gunk but on their sides, but all random. Its almost like it had a white coating on the sides of the hr markers but all fell off. I was able to take a better closer pics with my loop and the zoom feature in my iphone ha.

So could it be that the dial did have some sort of white paint on the sides of each marker? Its hard to tell from the Omega site archive pic (bkl&white). I been trying to find an image of this same model watch but i keep getting other types.

If I cant figure it out then ill leave it as be and love the way it is, an old 70's baby. Ty for the help,Mario

image-vintage-ST-566-0089.jpg

IMG_1821.JPG

IMG_1822.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I've remained silent on this thread, and at the risk of upsetting everyone, the thing that worries me the most the the apparent absence of Mark. The moderators do a great job and the members also pitch in, and the site seems to run itself, but it is a concern for the future of this forum when the owner is absent for all intents and purposes. Like many of the comments above I would hate to log in one day and things be closed down as I rely on this site for ideas and knowledge and also cheer me up. maybe the Moderators could reach out to him, assuming he does not read this thread, and express our concerns and let us know the plans going forward? some kind of WRT ark
    • That was the exact reason for me starting this thread watchie. Still we haven't worked out how the regulars are going to hook up if it goes tits up. I honestly think something should be arranged to stay in contact, we all help each other so much. 
    • Yeah ive watched that a few times before,  i couldnt find my old school dividers to scribe it up 😅 Yep thats the guy i bought a roll from . Thanks Nicklesilver that answers that perfectly and more or less what i thought an experiment over time would prove . The jumper arm is quite thick along its length, i left it that way intentionally, i thought the original was probably very thin, i didnt see that it was already missing. Setting isn't particularly stiff as such just positive, i still need to take it out and polish where it mates with the stem release. 
    • Yes, "Sold out" is difficult to understand. There doesn't seem to be a lot going on. It's been nine months since any new video was published on the Watch Repair Channel. The Level 4 course on watchfix.com has been in progress for what feels like forever (several years!?). Maybe Mark's enterprises aren't doing well or perhaps already so profitable there's nothing much to motivate him for more material. Or, perhaps these days he's more into crochet. The real reason is probably something entirely different but it would be nice/interesting to know. I don't mean to sound gloomy or pessimistic, but I wouldn't be surprised to be met by an HTTP 404. Every day feels like a gift. Speaking of watchfix.com I've been postponing the "Level 5: Servicing Chronograph Watches" course for a very, very long time. Anyway, I just enrolled on it so it's going to be very interesting to see the videos. I must say, IMO there's nothing really that can compete with Mark's courses when it comes to presentation and video quality. It's simply world-class and makes me associate with some really expensive BBC productions.
    • Steel has some funny properties, or at least counterintuitive. The modulus of elasticity is effectively (not exactly, but close enough) the same for steel that is annealed and hardened. What changes is the point of plastic deformation* . If the movement of your spring doesn't pass that, it should work fine. It looks a little thick, I would thin it a bit maybe from the main body out about halfway, maybe 10-20% thinner (not in thickness, along its form). But if it works it works!   *So- if you have two bars of the same steel, one annealed, one at 600 Vickers (general hardness watch arbors might be), clamp them to a table so the same length is hanging out, and put a weight on the ends, they will bend the same amount. But if you continue to add weight, then remove it, at a point the annealed bar won't return to its original straightness. That's the point of plastic deformation. But up to that point, as springs, they are the same. However- their wear characteristics will be very very different. And getting the hardened bar past its point of plastic deformation takes a lot more effort.
×
×
  • Create New...