Jump to content

H.Nathan & Co


Recommended Posts

G'day

My name is Tony from Newcastle Australia. 

I was left a  gold antique pocket watch in a dear friend's will. The movement is signed H.Nathan & Co. The rear cover is stamped H N & C. inside a shield followed by 18K 27773.

I had the watch checked and cleaned by a watchmaker who estimated it to be manufactured around 1860.

During the cleaning process the hairspring was broken.

The watchmaker told me that the watch is approx. 33.2 grams 18K solid gold. 16 1/2 lignes with a cylinder escapement.

The balance dia is 13.55mm.

I have been trying, unsuccessfully, for months to find out any information about H.Nathan & Co. That is how I came across this forum. Is there anybody out there who can shed any light on or has any information about the name? 

The watchmaker suggested that, unless I can find a replacement hairspring, it would be best to scrap the watch for its gold content.

Since it is such a beautiful timepiece with fond memories attached, I definitely want it repaired to its working order. So the second question, is it still possible to find a replacement hairspring and how would I go about sourcing it?

Any help would be enormously appreciated.

Tony

 

H.Nathan & Co.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi, keep the old hairspring, the collet and stud.

Genuine restoration comes first.

If you didn,t find a genune replacement and a hairspring is to be made " last resort" , the old one provides nearly all the required info.

Provide pictures.

Regards

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is known as a five bar movement and normally Swiss.  It has a cylinder escapement, which is not a balance staff. With a cylinder escapement, it is not compensated there for depending on the temperature of the weather it will gain or lose time. The hairspring will not be easy to replace, as you have to have the same size of collet and thickness and length of hairspring.

Am I right when you say the hairspring broke when the watch repairer was cleaning it. If that is right and he is a professional watch repairer, he is responsible for your watch and he is the one to put it right.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fiinding a used genuine H/S is not impossible and we don,t know if the broken one was original. 

Tony talks of repair to it's working order. Allow me to point out that a none genuine H/S devalues the watch. 

The watch is precious to tony, the guy damages it and proposes to scrap for it's gold. 

Better presntation of the watch by pictures is useful to give the owner best overall assessment and advice.

Regards

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Allow me to point out that a none genuine H/S devalues the watch.  Sorry you are wrong. A watch going and keeping time is more valuable then one that does not work. I also expect the H/spring would be the original. H/srings for these watches are not interchangeable none of the parts are. They might look the same to the eye but when it comes to fitting you notice it won't work.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

To all who took the time to reply, Thank you.

The watch repairer finally made a new hairspring and the watch is working like a charm. It is a beautiful piece. I have attached some photos.

I have had no luck in finding the origins of H Nathan & Co, Geneve. Anybody out there have any idea?

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year.

 

 

 

IMG_4239.JPG

IMG_4241.JPG

IMG_4243.JPG

IMG_4246.JPG

IMG_4248.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

H.Nathan and co where part of a group of companies owned by the Australian company called Hoffnung and Co their buisness was primarily based around the importing and sale of goods through catalogue they where importers among other things of sewing machines and parts, and Swiss and American watches and all forms of gold and silver jewellery and display cases for retail jewellers.

They where a very large concern and supplied goods in Australia, New Zealand and Tasmania , Fiji and Honolulu and had huge warehouses across Australia.

H.Nathan and Co was the company's London based subsiduary they where responsible for purchasing goods in Europe and America and arranging the importation to Australia they would have been responsible for the purchasing and importation of your watch, they would not have been the manufacturer of your watch as such but would have sourced them from manufacturers in Switzerland and stamped them with the company name, the earliest reference to Hoffnung and co I can Find is 1872.

I think they would have been the Australian equivalent of Sear's Roebuck catalogue in America.

Just to add to the above since writing this I have learned the company was formed in 1851 and went out of buisness in 1980.

Edited by wls1971
more info added
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you wls1971 for the lead. Great job.

What I read since your post is that Henry Nathan loaned Sigmund Hoffnung 500 pounds to purchase goods and ship them to the antipodeans in 1851.

Hoffnung became a very successful and prosperous businessman and went in partnership with Henry Nathan as his European supplier.

Hoffnung had his own jewelry mark: SH & Co.

Thanks again.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I voted leave too, my reasoning was the the EU is undemocratic, no elected officials. I don't regret it but I  am sad that both sides acted like petulant toddlers.  Shameful.  I'm not on other forums but if I was and left this site, would you shun me? Of course not, we aren't petulant toddlers.  
    • This is a type of tool that may be suitable to remove the bezel - though note that I'm pretty sure the watch should be face down - not face up, as in some of the photos of these tools on amazon & ebay! If you try one one of those, put the movement screws back in first to avoid accidents. https://www.amazon.co.uk/Removal-Professional-Remover-Watchmaker-Diameter/dp/B09XCH4QVN?source=ps-sl-shoppingads-lpcontext&ref_=fplfs&smid=A296NCMMFVXSDN&th=1  
    • Hi, I’m constantly asking my wife to help me with removing the stem in order to complete casing. To expand, this is not a challenge for me when the setting lever is secured by a screw (older calibers). However when the setting lever is attached to a spring loaded setting lever axel, like on more modern calibers, I simply don’t see how to apply enough pressure on the button to get the stem out short of putting the movement face down with the dial and hands attached, which I’m loath to do in order to avoid damaging the dial/hands? what technique should I be using? thanks  
    • Many thanks for your advice (being borne in mind at present) & offer Dell. When I was given the clock the plastic anchor was loose on the arbour (it had split at the 'hole') &, after repairing this, I have been trying to determine whether the spindle (pin) should be perpendicular when the pallet is sitting on a flat surface; or whether, when installed, its L-R extremes (or alternatively its tick & tock points) should lie at equal angles from the vertical when moved with spring absent. I can get the clock to run but in every such configuration the top block has to be turned anti-clockwise (from above) by quite a bit in order to be 'in beat' & it always runs fast (despite the pendulum being set to as slow as possible). This makes me wonder if there is any particular feature of/fault in a torsion spring clock which determines which turn direction (if any) is necessary to get it 'in beat'; & whether there would be a different set of settings that would get it running nearer to time at somewhere around the mid timing/inertia position which would then allow tweaking of the fast/slow setting.
    • Now this has happened I bet China or India just to name two will start to produce none genuine parts.  I did. But idiot Boris Johnson failed miserably in his negotiations. The E U stitched up the UK like a kipper. Nigel Farage  offered his help but big head Boris declined. So this is why we are in this mess all because Johnson wasn't clever enough.  
×
×
  • Create New...