Jump to content

Timex M25 what to start first???


Ianh

Recommended Posts

I never repaired any Timex. I think this is right. After placing the parts and calendar, dial . To place the hands in the correct place, pull stem out to set hands and turn until the calender jumps over and fit hands at 12 o'clock.

44444.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

be sure you have the date wheel ass'y right side up.

1 hour ago, oldhippy said:

I never repaired any Timex. I think this is right. After placing the parts and calendar, dial . To place the hands in the correct place, pull stem out to set hands and turn until the calender jumps over and fit hands at 12 o'clock.

44444.jpg

dang - your spot on :)  would only add that the date wheel assembly goes in before cannon pinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Ianh said:

Yep that’s the one I have but on a M25 movement?

no you are working on a 105 and it does not make much difference.  You have the date wheel assembly upside down is my guess.

Take a look at it and note that one side has a tapered tip.  This is the side that goes in first.  Be-sure to place this in before inserting the cannon pinion too.  Speaking of which there are actually two parts there. So before you install anything else slip on the cannon pinion and pull the stem to set mode.  It should turn very freely will little to no resistance.  If it does than want you should do is split the two parts with the use of a very thin blade such as an xacto knife.  The one I use has been blunted to prevent cutting myself.  Once apart dot the inner tube with oil and refit the two parts.  Retest and they should be nice and smooth.  If you still feel it is tight or not just right have a look at the minute wheel assembly teeth as they may have worn due to the tight fit of the cannon pinion.

 

BTW:  I just happen to have one of these "Coke Bezel" divers on the bench and one was completed last week.  These are quite popular because Timex re-issued them as quartz with Indiglo about a year or two ago.

 

DSC08772.JPG

DSC08773.JPG

DSC08774.JPG

DSC08775.JPG

DSC08776.JPG

DSC08777.JPG

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

well now on second look that is a 25 which tells me the model you are working on was not sold in the US. No matter, the instructions are the same. check the date wheel and the fit of the canon pinion.  Another tip is to lube the area under the rocker and grease the stem tube and set lever too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

so quick history, Timex had the #24 and decided to add the date feature and thus the #25.  Which is built much like the 24 but with a few mods.

fast forward tot he 70's and they had the bright idea ( I blame the bean counters) that they could make the movement for less money by changing the click.  Yeah they changed it alright and made it out of a thin bit of spring steel and it is the first part to wear.

Also the they elongated the shaft of the fourth wheel.  This allowed for the movements to be fitted into deeper cases and other such changes they were making at the time.  All in all the method Timex used was to have a base model that could be added on to  add other features to the watch.  They even did did with the cases latter on.  Well you see I have too much Timex in my head.:)

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

it looks to me that the detent spring may not be engaged to the date ring.  Or the date wheel is not sitting properly on the four posts.

So first try it without the date ring in place.  Pull the crown and turn it to simulate time setting and while doing so you should see the date wheel turn.  That little pin on the wheel is what actually advances the ring.  got it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah ive watched that a few times before,  i couldnt find my old school dividers to scribe it up 😅 Yep thats the guy i bought a roll from .
    • Yes, "Sold out" is difficult to understand. There doesn't seem to be a lot going on. It's been nine months since any new video was published on the Watch Repair Channel. The Level 4 course on watchfix.com has been in progress for what feels like forever (several years!?). Maybe Mark's enterprises aren't doing well or perhaps already so profitable there's nothing much to motivate him for more material. Or, perhaps these days he's more into crochet. The real reason is probably something entirely different but it would be nice/interesting to know. I don't mean to sound gloomy or pessimistic, but I wouldn't be surprised to be met by an HTTP 404. Every day feels like a gift. Speaking of watchfix.com I've been postponing the "Level 5: Servicing Chronograph Watches" course for a very, very long time. Anyway, I just enrolled on it so it's going to be very interesting to see the videos. I must say, IMO there's nothing really that can compete with Mark's courses when it comes to presentation and video quality. It's simply world-class and makes me associate with some really expensive BBC productions.
    • Steel has some funny properties, or at least counterintuitive. The modulus of elasticity is effectively (not exactly, but close enough) the same for steel that is annealed and hardened. What changes is the point of plastic deformation* . If the movement of your spring doesn't pass that, it should work fine. It looks a little thick, I would thin it a bit maybe from the main body out about halfway, maybe 10-20% thinner (not in thickness, along its form). But if it works it works!   *So- if you have two bars of the same steel, one annealed, one at 600 Vickers (general hardness watch arbors might be), clamp them to a table so the same length is hanging out, and put a weight on the ends, they will bend the same amount. But if you continue to add weight, then remove it, at a point the annealed bar won't return to its original straightness. That's the point of plastic deformation. But up to that point, as springs, they are the same. However- their wear characteristics will be very very different. And getting the hardened bar past its point of plastic deformation takes a lot more effort.
    • @JohnR725 now that you've mentioned it. This is actually the second aftermarket spring (same place and brand) I ordered as the first one broke. The eye on which the arbor pulls on, broke off on the first spring after the first wind, and also it was a bit to large for the arbor. Looked like on one the second picture in the 2nd group. The second one was exactly the same, I had to bend it a bit, to give it a more prominent curve to the end of the spring so that the arbor catches the eye.  Also I believe both were 5-10mm shorter. Not that I writing that, I feel a bit dumb, as the spring might actually been the problem all along, although its advertised as a substitute to the original...     
    • The CS70 is the only one they show as annealed.  A further search on ebay, I found CS75 and CS100 annealed carbon steel strips  e.g. https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/314072784422
×
×
  • Create New...