Jump to content

Rolex Datejust 1601 replacement hands


Recommended Posts

Hey guys, I've recently bought a grey replacement sigma dial for my Datejust and I'm having trouble finding hands to go with it. The dial is a service dial with white gold markers so would that mean the hands should be white gold? The lume is also superluminova so preferably the hands would be the same but if I had to redo the lume on the hands it wouldn't be the end of the world. I've attached a picture of the dial and the watch has a cal 1575 movement. Thanks 

31086EA9-9FCF-46D4-9E95-A0BA6A109B87.png

4505387C-C151-4D8C-918B-7DD6A74BEED8.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, oldhippy said:

 

Hello cgasgarth,

On this friendly forum before making a post for help or advice. We like new members to introduce themselves. So tell us a little about yourself. 

Welp I'm in high school so my budget is a bit tight. My Grail watch is a white gold day date 1803 with a slate dial but those will be near impossible to find when I get to the point where I can afford one. Right now my Grail was a grey dial Datejust but with the prices going up I just bought one the I liked but wasn't perfect so this project is to just fill the hole for it. Hope that helps :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Welcome.

Yes, the "sigma" dial was used to indicate the change to white gold hands and indicies, over the former stainless steel used prior. This change was due to the corrosion of the hands mainly. This dial would probably have the classic straight hands with the lume tracks in their centers. Many sellers have aftermarket ones, but for white gold you may have to wait for a genuine set to come along, and they would most certainly be (non-glowing) Tritium lume material.

What is interesting is that I've never seen a sigma dial using anything other than Tritium, as indicated on the bottom of your dial...

Is this a re-lume perhaps? You indicated it as a service dial, but I've never seen a sigma marked service dial. A luminova replacement would have "SWISS" only at 6 o'clock. I have seen "T<25" marked dials with luminova, (early service dials) but never sigma dials before. I suspect it is an original one that was re-lumed in the past. And from what I can see, it was done very well!

Please correct me, if I'm off base, with some supporting information that lead you to the conclusion it is an original service dial. I'm quite curious...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Tudor said:

Welcome.

Yes, the "sigma" dial was used to indicate the change to white gold hands and indicies, over the former stainless steel used prior. This change was due to the corrosion of the hands mainly. This dial would probably have the classic straight hands with the lume tracks in their centers. Many sellers have aftermarket ones, but for white gold you may have to wait for a genuine set to come along, and they would most certainly be (non-glowing) Tritium lume material.

What is interesting is that I've never seen a sigma dial using anything other than Tritium, as indicated on the bottom of your dial...

Is this a re-lume perhaps? You indicated it as a service dial, but I've never seen a sigma marked service dial. A luminova replacement would have "SWISS" only at 6 o'clock. I have seen "T<25" marked dials with luminova, (early service dials) but never sigma dials before. I suspect it is an original one that was re-lumed in the past. And from what I can see, it was done very well!

Please correct me, if I'm off base, with some supporting information that lead you to the conclusion it is an original service dial. I'm quite curious...

From the info I have from the seller the dial was relumed by RSC which based on how well done it is I can believe. From what I know the Singapore RSC did this for some time instead of outright replacing the dial which makes me very happy if true. Once I get the dial in hand I'll be able to confirm if the markers are white gold or not but I think for the price I paid I got a great deal on a rare dial. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tudor said:

Well unless the markers were changed for some reason, the sigma indicates they are white gold. 

I'm more saying that because of the slight possibility it could be fake but I just got it in hand and it looks good to me. Anyways back to my problem, do you know where I can source the hands for it? It seems like the cost of the hands isn't much but every Watchmaker I've talked to wants to preform a full service on the watch which for me is too expensive and isn't needed as it was serviced last year and runs perfectly. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Tudor said:

eBay and the Rolex forum are where I hunt for parts. 

If you want steel ones (though they might have white gold too) try ofrei 

I bought a set of steel ones as a backup but I'm trying to hold out until I get a set of white gold ones, thank you for the tips.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Put the movement in a movement holder and it will be supported as you push down on the setting lever post to release the winding stem. Make sure the post is over the shoulder of the movement holder so what you are pressing down on is supported. As a general rule, hold the movement and not the movement holder. Replace the hands when the movement isn't in the case and support the centre jewel (if it has one) on a hard surface or staking block when replacing the hands to stop the jewel accidentally moving or even coming out. A dedicated movement holder with a central jewel support is even better, but pricey
    • It might help us if we knew which watch like model number.
    • Hi, guys I have a bit of a predicament and hopefully, somebody can advise. I'm working on a Roamer MST 521 where the movement is extracted from the crystal side. I'm now at the final hurdle where I need to replace the movement back into its case but I'm not sure of the correct procedure. I still need to fit the hands but that's where the problem lies. If I insert the winding stem to test the hands for correct alignment I will need to turn the movement over to release the stem again it's the spring-loaded type and needs a small bit of force to push down but with the hands fitted, I don't think I can do this on a cushion without causing some damage to the hands and that's the last thing I want to do, this watch has already been a love-hate relationship and I'm so close to boxing this one off which I'm counting as my first major project.  The other option is to case the movement then fit the hands and hope everything is okay. I've already broken the original winding stem but managed to find a replacement, the last one in stock, so I'm a bit reluctant to keep removing it. Any suggestions would be appreciated. 
    • I would go for the dearer spring. You won't need to remove the spring from the carrier ring and then use a mainspring winder to get it into the barrel, for a start. Also that spring is closer to the needed dimensions, especially the length. The length plays a part in the mainsprings strength. If you double the length you will half the force (strength) of the spring and vice-versa. A spring with 20 mm less length would be about 7% shorter, so technically would be 7% more strength, but I find halving this number is closer to real-world findings, so the spring would be about 3 to 4% more strength/force. On a mainspring that ideally kicks out 300 degrees of amplitude, a 3% increase in amplitude would be 309 degrees. Increasing or decreasing the length of the mainspring will affect the power reserve to a greater or lesser degree. It depends how much shorter or longer it is. I've attached a lesson regarding mainsprings, focussing on the size and strength of the spring within the barrel, you might find helpful. Unfortunately it is a PDF converted from a PowerPoint presentation, but only a slide was lost that was originally a video of fitting a mainspring   Lesson 5 The mainspring.pdf
×
×
  • Create New...