Jump to content

Shortt–Synchronome clock


Tmuir

Recommended Posts

The Perth Observatory has in their possession a Shortt–Synchronome clock, this clock used to be the clock that provided the time for Western Australia.

For those that have never heard of it, this is the most accurate pendulum clock ever made. When it was made in the 1920s and 30s it was believed to have an error of 1 second a year, but in 1984 one of these clocks was compared to an atomic clock and found to have an error of only 1 second every 12 years.

It achieves this by having 2 pendulums, one that swings in a vacuum which is the master and via magnetic sensors it sends pulses to a slave clock that displays the time.

I was just wondering is anyone here ever has had the chance to see or touch one of these clocks?

Currently the observatory is looking to get this repaired, I have no involvement in this, but I do know people that are tendering to repair the clock and should they be successful I will be asking if I can atleast come up and see the clock whilst they service it. Just stressing I won't be working on the clock, but to get a chance to see a clock like this serviced would be too good an opportunity to miss.

For those that would like to do some more reading on this clock it has a wiki page.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shortt–Synchronome_clock

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Tmuir said:

I was just wondering is anyone here ever has had the chance to see or touch one of these clocks?

I have seen them before there are various ones on display in museums in the U.K, I have seen one at the Greenwich Observatory and the science museum has one in its collection and quite surprisingly they do turn up in auctions I have a Christies catalogue for a specialist horology sale in which one is listed.

As for touching one I always heed the signs that say "Do not touch the exhibits":)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Steel has some funny properties, or at least counterintuitive. The modulus of elasticity is effectively (not exactly, but close enough) the same for steel that is annealed and hardened. What changes is the point of plastic deformation* . If the movement of your spring doesn't pass that, it should work fine. It looks a little thick, I would thin it a bit maybe from the main body out about halfway, maybe 10-20% thinner (not in thickness, along its form). But if it works it works!   *So- if you have two bars of the same steel, one annealed, one at 600 Vickers (general hardness watch arbors might be), clamp them to a table so the same length is hanging out, and put a weight on the ends, they will bend the same amount. But if you continue to add weight, then remove it, at a point the annealed bar won't return to its original straightness. That's the point of plastic deformation. But up to that point, as springs, they are the same. However- their wear characteristics will be very very different.
    • @JohnR725 now that you've mentioned it. This is actually the second aftermarket spring (same place and brand) I ordered as the first one broke. The eye on which the arbor pulls on, broke off on the first spring after the first wind, and also it was a bit to large for the arbor. Looked like on one the second picture in the 2nd group. The second one was exactly the same, I had to bend it a bit, to give it a more prominent curve to the end of the spring so that the arbor catches the eye.  Also I believe both were 5-10mm shorter. Not that I writing that, I feel a bit dumb, as the spring might actually been the problem all along, although its advertised as a substitute to the original...     
    • The CS70 is the only one they show as annealed.  A further search on ebay, I found CS75 and CS100 annealed carbon steel strips  e.g. https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/314072784422
    • Aloha and thanks for catching all these small but important details, John.  I'm going to give it a shot. The good news is I have a parts movement here with a perfect complete balance.  I will place them side by side for visual reference when doing what you outlined.  It's been a while were I've had a hobby in which I joined a forum.  I forgot just how helpful everyone can be. Mahalo. Frank.
    • Mike if you wanna drop me your address I'll send you a strip of this cs 100 in an envelope . I'd like your opinion of its workability  The cs100 might be better carbon is 1%
×
×
  • Create New...