Jump to content

Balance wheel truing


Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

 

Working on an old Pierce movement that initially needed a new balance staff. Got that sorted just to find that the wheel has a severe wobble. As far as I can judge it’s not my riveting that’s faulty but more likely the arms that were a bit skewed.

 

Have been thinking to get a truing caliper (or whatever the tool is called) and just laid hands on one of the dual versions.

 

As far as I can judge one of the sides has tiny holes that seems suited for the staff pivots and the other side allows a deeper setting that holds the staff on the ”shoulders”, minimizing the risk to break the pivots while truing.

 

There’s also a small ”handle” that I assume can be used for bending and twisting.

 

If there’s any know how with these operations I’d really appreciate some feedback on what to do and what to avoid.

 

What I’m primarily worried about is the risk of breaking the riveting when applying the needed force to the wheel and arms. As far as I can understand the rivet has to withstand all the force applied.

 

Photos are attached.

 

3fd652156bcad32bd45c9c48f10d79e6.jpgfc08c28df0eac23017378bba6fce3bee.jpg

 

 

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I usually bend the individual arms (assuming a split temperature-compensating balance) by holding the opposite arm and twisting. I thinking supporting by the staff is asking for trouble. The tool is for observing true-ness, but I'm not aware of it ever being used for bending the wheel itself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Makes sense...

My balance wheel is of the closed type but I guess the process shoudn’t be that different?

To hold the opposite arm firmly without gripping the wheel, I guess I could modify a pair of pliers to go over the wheel and just grip the arm?

And the ”handle” with slots could then slide onto the arm to be bent and use as a lever to bend the arm? The narrowest slot fits nicely on the arm of my wheel.

I was hoping that I could do all this with the wheel in the tool to get quick feedback but it may be asking for trouble...






Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

because balance wheels  truing can get complicated I have a link. go to the bottom of the page Joseph School of Watch Making you'll see a section on balance wheel truing.

I have an image from the book to understand the key feature of the tool. Notice how the staff is resting on the conical  or cone part of the staff as the book calls it? then the tool needs to be adjusted so it's holding really tight. That means there is a zero danger of breaking the pivots off your supposed to true the balance wheel in the truing caliper. other things to watch out for sometimes truing calipers have holes on both ends for different size balance wheels. If you don't have that clearance you'll break the pivots off. So you have to be on the cone of the pivots. then not all the schools will have a double set of holes. Sometimes the other end is used for truing wheels. Other things you want to check on make sure your holes really are clear and that somebody didn't break something off before you.

then just to review things you may want to look the other sections on staffing.

http://www.mybulova.com/vintage-bulova-catalogs

bwtc.JPG

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi and thanks for this interesting article (and website).

It seems my initial thoughts on the usage of the tool were not that far off. The explanation for the through-holes in the pivot holders make sense, I just wonder why my tool only has them on one side?

After ensuring that the wheel is resting on the pivot shoulder the truing operation is done by finger-force and there’s no mentioning about issues with breaking the staff rivet from this so I guess it should be fairly safe, assuming I got the riveting done properly.

I will find a couple of scrap balances to practise on and see how it goes....

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I've remained silent on this thread, and at the risk of upsetting everyone, the thing that worries me the most the the apparent absence of Mark. The moderators do a great job and the members also pitch in, and the site seems to run itself, but it is a concern for the future of this forum when the owner is absent for all intents and purposes. Like many of the comments above I would hate to log in one day and things be closed down as I rely on this site for ideas and knowledge and also cheer me up. maybe the Moderators could reach out to him, assuming he does not read this thread, and express our concerns and let us know the plans going forward? some kind of WRT ark
    • That was the exact reason for me starting this thread watchie. Still we haven't worked out how the regulars are going to hook up if it goes tits up. I honestly think something should be arranged to stay in contact, we all help each other so much. 
    • Yeah ive watched that a few times before,  i couldnt find my old school dividers to scribe it up 😅 Yep thats the guy i bought a roll from . Thanks Nicklesilver that answers that perfectly and more or less what i thought an experiment over time would prove . The jumper arm is quite thick along its length, i left it that way intentionally, i thought the original was probably very thin, i didnt see that it was already missing. Setting isn't particularly stiff as such just positive, i still need to take it out and polish where it mates with the stem release. 
    • Yes, "Sold out" is difficult to understand. There doesn't seem to be a lot going on. It's been nine months since any new video was published on the Watch Repair Channel. The Level 4 course on watchfix.com has been in progress for what feels like forever (several years!?). Maybe Mark's enterprises aren't doing well or perhaps already so profitable there's nothing much to motivate him for more material. Or, perhaps these days he's more into crochet. The real reason is probably something entirely different but it would be nice/interesting to know. I don't mean to sound gloomy or pessimistic, but I wouldn't be surprised to be met by an HTTP 404. Every day feels like a gift. Speaking of watchfix.com I've been postponing the "Level 5: Servicing Chronograph Watches" course for a very, very long time. Anyway, I just enrolled on it so it's going to be very interesting to see the videos. I must say, IMO there's nothing really that can compete with Mark's courses when it comes to presentation and video quality. It's simply world-class and makes me associate with some really expensive BBC productions.
    • Steel has some funny properties, or at least counterintuitive. The modulus of elasticity is effectively (not exactly, but close enough) the same for steel that is annealed and hardened. What changes is the point of plastic deformation* . If the movement of your spring doesn't pass that, it should work fine. It looks a little thick, I would thin it a bit maybe from the main body out about halfway, maybe 10-20% thinner (not in thickness, along its form). But if it works it works!   *So- if you have two bars of the same steel, one annealed, one at 600 Vickers (general hardness watch arbors might be), clamp them to a table so the same length is hanging out, and put a weight on the ends, they will bend the same amount. But if you continue to add weight, then remove it, at a point the annealed bar won't return to its original straightness. That's the point of plastic deformation. But up to that point, as springs, they are the same. However- their wear characteristics will be very very different. And getting the hardened bar past its point of plastic deformation takes a lot more effort.
×
×
  • Create New...