Jump to content

Timegrapher microphone


Simonkitch

Recommended Posts

Hi

I'm looking to build a mic setup that will work with Watch O Scope software or similar software. I've tried playing around with a webcam mic and a cheap Piezo but I'm just not getting any reading. I don't fancy building a pre amp so can anyone recommend a microphone sensitive enough to hear a watch and that will plug into my PC via 3.5 or USB?

Thanks

Simon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, rogart63 said:

There is a thread in the forum about that. Can't remember the name of the thread right now. Homemade timegrapher or something like that. 

 

 

Thanks I've checked these out already but they seem to rely on you having a pre amp which I don't want to try and build.

I want a mic that will work out the box if pos.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Simonkitch said:

Thanks I've checked these out already but they seem to rely on you having a pre amp which I don't want to try and build.

I want a mic that will work out the box if pos.

https://tg.ciovil.li

Tg timegrapher is designed to work with conventional and noisy microscope. Just install the software and plug in your mic.

Works very well in a quiet room.

I tried to make a contact mic with a preamp and it totally failed...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, praezis said:

What do you want to tell us with your statement? :rolleyes:

Frank

I tried to use a piezo pickup for detecting watch ticks instead of the normal mic. The idea was that piezo only pick up vibrates and not noise from the room, so the signal should be very clean.

I used an old buzzer from a crappy step measure thingy, bought a piezo preamp for guitars, and hooked everything up. I originally bought a piezo pickup for instruments but it was useless. The signal turned out to be too weak for my laptop to work correctly. I needed a much stronger preamp or something else. It was a lot of hassle to wire everything and using a normal mic worked fine anyway...

So I just tape my mic to the movement holder, manually flip the holder over for positions, and see the results on my computer. It works 100% fine and I realized I completely wasted my time doing all that preamp crap.

Plus I just used my mic I had from my desktop so I didn't need to buy the preamp at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Software-based timing machines are quite nice but as some of you a found out getting a proper signal in is a challenge. There are quite a few challenges to get the software to work you need a proper microphone to pick up the tiny vibrations of the watch. The problem with most microphones are designed for audio pickups we want to pick up vibrations. Some of the music industries microphones work the only problem is there designed for a greater vibration. Then the popular piezo Discs have to be properly mounted to pick up the vibrations and still need to be shielded from audio because they will pick up audio. Then the preamp needs to be low noise and ideally should have some internal filtering. They are very specific frequency ranges for watch pickup versus the music industry.
Computer-based microphones that includes the microphones found in cell phones with apps for timing. They're designed for audio pick up picking up the rate of the watch relatively easy getting the rest of the signals can be problematic at times. We've already had one discussion where the people trying to help were annoyed because the pickup was faulty and was giving false readings.work the software-based machines are nice.

Then one of the reasons software-based timing machines are popular is they range from free to relatively cheap for the most part. That's because originally hardware-based timing machines were very expensive. To buy a decent Swiss machine will cost you several thousand dollars for instance. But the Chinese make some really decent machines in particular theTimegrapher 1000 or 1900. Both machines are really decent 1900 has a slightly nicer screen. Pricewise the 1900 is just under $200 1000 is around $150 typically on eBay and there's a dealer that sells these in the US at $120. For an out-of-the-box solution for something that works with a microphone that rotates in multiple positions the price is very reasonable.

Then as a reminder especially because the person asking the question is new to the group a timing machine is used for more than timing it's a diagnostic tool. So even for hobbyists because of the affordable price the Chinese machines or the software if you get everything to work they have become must have tools.

http://www.acetimer.com/Timing-Machine/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree.

Diy microphones are a problem if you think, you need no electronic skills to develop/ build one. If it does not work, blame the tinker, not the piezo. If a normal mic works: fine, but probably just by chance with your special equipment.

The mentioned thread has many good microphone concepts, simple and sumptuous ones.

Software TM are not only used because they are low cost,  but because some offer much more analyzing tools than the Chinese and don't show false results in certain situations. A reason why many professionals here use PCTM.

Frank

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, praezis said:

I agree.

Diy microphones are a problem if you think, you need no electronic skills to develop/ build one. If it does not work, blame the tinker, not the piezo. If a normal mic works: fine, but probably just by chance with your special equipment.

The mentioned thread has many good microphone concepts, simple and sumptuous ones.

Software TM are not only used because they are low cost,  but because some offer much more analyzing tools than the Chinese and don't show false results in certain situations. A reason why many professionals here use PCTM.

Frank

By the end of it, I learned that watch ticks are very different than instrument sounds. They are significantly quieter and that's why there are special purpose machines for these things. General mics work but noise is always going to be an noise and you can't see things like the unlocking tick because it's so quiet.

In the end, I don't really mind the fact I got nowhere, it's the life of DIY. Broken watches or broken electronics, same sort of fun.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I decided to have a go at using a pre amp with the web cam mic because i'm really interested in getting this working. I used a basic circuit from google search and bread boarded it. output is from a seiko 5. Works but obviously it would be impossible to work on the watch. This setup does not work with the guitar mic pic up i bought so i'm going to try and build the watch o scope amp next and make a clamp.

Thanks for all the input so far.

 

 

Watch-O-Scope pre amp 2.png

watch o scope 2.PNG

watch o scope.PNG

watch.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The reason your circuit does not work with the guitar mic pic up Is it's been designed for a capacitive microphone which has a built in amplifier. I have a image below of what capacitive microphone circuit looks like internally. Then the reality is you don't need the circuit because computers have that built as it was designed for capacitive microphone. Guitar pickups are typically piezo it require a different type of preamplifier to work with the computer.

Then regarding the computer they're all different. The last link I have below is a US patents for a different kind a microphone not relevant for this discussion. The relevant part of the patent for this discussion is different input circuitry or specifically the bias voltages. This becomes relevant if you're trying to power your microphone off the biased voltage of the computer. The voltages are all conceivably different. If you start looking at the integrated circuits found in computers circuitry microphones a lot of them will supply different voltages. Then regarding the computers audio processing some computers it's almost an afterthought they weren't designed for audio high fidelity others are better. So if you have everything else works right you may have a crappy computer input. One of the ways around that is to get a USB sound device. Another advantage of USB devices is you can steal 5 V off the power four your circuitry.

then below I've listed out some of the software-based timing machines there are or were others. Because were discussing microphones and some of these sell the microphones separate or they will convert microphones for their software. In other words there relevant for this discussion.

So software ranges from free to costing some money the pickup is what were concerned about. Watch Escapement Analyser - eTimer if you look at the eBay link you can see the microphone a clip on microphone is really nice unfortunately it's not sold separately. Also notice they're using a USB device. But if you go to the UK source he will convert older watch timing machines by adding in new circuitry. So that's an option you get a microphone that rotates it just not cheap.

PCTM s interesting if you look at the discussion the circuitry for the microphone is given. Plus the person who wrote the software is in this discussion I was hoping he could try an experiment for us? if you look at the price list a variety of microphones are available separately I'm curious as to whether the microphone works with the other free software out there?

Another option for a DIY microphone is to start with something that we know that works? the Chinese on eBay sell their microphone separate from the timing machines it runs around $80. It looks like they've loosely copied witschi there is a Bimorph sensor with a dual op amp which should supply enough signal to the computer. this is on my list of projects to do which is one of the reasons I bought a cheap slightly used 1000 machine off of eBay was to hack the microphone. Unfortunately my list of things to do is rather long and it's not at the top of the list.
 

Windows Software Timing Machine PCTM

https://www.watchrepairtalk.com/topic/6333-windows-software-timing-machine-pctm/?tab=comments#comment-63918

https://c.web.de/@337134913998293880/YuEh_TobSjaCfyBDix_1gg

 

Open source timing software

https://forums.watchuseek.com/f6/open-source-timing-software-2542874.html

https://github.com/vacaboja/tg

 

Watch Escapement Analyser - eTimer

https://www.ebay.com/itm/112473962615?ul_noapp=true

http://www.delphelectronics.co.uk/products.html

 

Watch-O-Scope  - D. I. Y. Watch Timing Machine

http://www.watchoscope.com/

https://www.watchrepairtalk.com/topic/3002-d-i-y-watch-timing-machine/


Amplifier circuit for electret microphone with enhanced performance

https://patents.google.com/patent/US6580797B1/en?oq=6580797

 

mc-2.JPG

mc-1.JPG

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

PCTM s interesting if you look at the discussion the circuitry for the microphone is given. Plus the person who wrote the software is in this discussion I was hoping he could try an experiment for us? if you look at the price list a variety of microphones are available separately I'm curious as to whether the microphone works with the other free software out there?

Another option for a DIY microphone is to start with something that we know that works? the Chinese on eBay sell their microphone separate from the timing machines it runs around $80. It looks like they've loosely copied witschi there is a Bimorph sensor with a dual op amp which should supply enough signal to the computer. 

Hi,

I feel adressed and like to reply:
- PCTM microphones can be used for other TM software, too. They all use the buffered data that was recorded by the soundcard. Difference is where they put the limit of minimum sound level that can still be evaluated. PCTM works satisfying with very low levels.

- The Chinese mics need a rather high voltage (12V) for their internal amp. It is not direct available from a PC.  I thought about offering them with adapted electronics that needs no extra supply, like my other mics, but did not yet find a seller. 
Do you have link to the ones you mentioned?

Frank

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Hi I made mine as per the instructions. Like a movement holder with the disc mounted at the rear, the front was screwed in and held the watch crown against the disc but it did need the amplifier.  Where did you get the capsule , salvaged from the head phones I am Interested.  What sort of volume do you get through the PC speakers.      a novel and practical soloution . Brill

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Hi guys. I’m pretty new to all these. Tried building my own mic and preamp using a piezo disc and the PCTM schematics however I’ve had so much difficulty trying to get my iPhone X to detect that I have a microphone plugged in. I am using a 3.5mm TRSS plug which I then had to plug into an adaptor which splits the mic from the speaker, and then to my lightning cable adaptor to my iPhone X. However no matter what I do, my phone won’t detect this as a mic. My adaptors are all working fine as when I plug a normal pc mic, it gets detected on the phone. Anyone has any ideas please? Would love some help. Thank you!

Jameson


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have you verified that your pre-amp does indeed work?
You can achieve this by plugging into any aux/line input
I suspect you are in danger of destroying your I-phone

You are right. I plugged it in and there was no sound. Omg. I have no idea what I’m doing now. [emoji2357]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I remember when I was in school the instructor would use whale oil on some problematic little tiny ladies watches because he felt it was a better oil. then for my birthday on my friends gave me a bottle of vintage nye watch oil. Complete with the advertisement inside which I have scanned below and what I find interesting is it hasn't gone bad in the model and it is super super thin I'm guessing the viscosity of water basically. then somewhere in the discussion group within the last year or so somebody purchased one of these bottles off of eBay and was using it on their watch. After all a bottle watch oil is? Apparently it was an expensive I'm guessing or it's what they had or something no idea what the final outcome was other than I found it amusing. then somewhere in the Internet somewhat it made up this interesting chart down below. I believe the first natural oil is there 8000 oil. Notice the friction properties in the first two columns in other words it's really good at reducing friction better than anything else.  But it does have additional specifications like contact angle which is almost never found in any spec sheet which has to do with how likely it is to spread. Big numbers are bad in those two columns and you can see spreading test it's very bad. So basically it's a really outstanding oil for a short period of time before it spreads away and of course being natural it has a habit of probably going bad very soon the best oil of course is Elgin oil at least the second version of their oil very good at reducing friction and very good at staying wherever you place it and still very fluid oil viscosity wise. then one of the most famous oils of all Swiss 9010 that I personally don't like and don't use quite a ways down on the chart personally prefer 9020 which unfortunately is not listed on this chart. It slightly heavier viscosity and has a little nicer contact angle those more likely to stay wherever you put it versus 9010 which universally requires epilam if you would like to stay wherever you putting it. then if you're in the viscosities here's an interesting chart that I found on the discussion group. ou will note there some minor variations between the viscosities listed here and the chart up above which may be attributed to the difference in temperature  universally everything is supposed to be at 20° C and the chart up above is at 40° C. Because what becomes interesting on the chart is 8000 is listed out of viscosity of 95 which does agree with their technical information and the PDF for the oil lists at 40° it is 41 where up above the chart everything is either listed as 50 or light whatever that means? Then Elgin oil is listed on the chart in a clever interesting way. you look on the chart at a viscosity of 125 you'll find Dr. Tillwich LGN oil which is the synthetic version of Elgin oil. Many years ago they had a request and gathered up a whole bunch of samples and synthesize the oil and for a while it was available for sale although it was rather expensive I had seen a bottle for about $100. and as far as viscosities go it does appear to be right in both charts in other words at 20° it's 125 and at 40° it's 50. So unfortunately it brings up the problem of viscosity or better yet contact angle determines the spread ability of your lubrication unfortunately we typically don't get contact angle we just get viscosity. So the casual trend is a heavier oil tends to not spread although as we can see from looking at the chart that isn't hundred percent true. As far as reducing friction goes viscosity doesn't necessarily come into play here either. Or basically we don't have enough of the right tech sheets to make a real proper comparison.
    • Somewhere in the back of my mind i thought you had the jewelled seitz pivot gauge, i was just asking if you had this scaled pin gauge as well. I might have just made up that thought  H. 😅
    • Yes, but the idea was that the OP wanted to be able to measure the diameter of the jewel holes in his collection of unordered jewels. Also, depending on the type of micrometre used one has to be careful not to dent the very small pivots (< 0.12mm) when pinching them in the micrometre. In my experience, the JKA Feintaster is safe to use also when measuring very small pivots. I don't understand your question, which I think was for me, no?
    • I didn't think there were any gauges under 0.1  .  I do like the old art deco tanks which are small sizes. My staff stash amounts to around half a mil. So i think I probably have that base covered. This 0.1mm set seems to be the most expensive, larger 100 piece set are about half the price. For around a 100 quid you can have sizes from 0.1 up to 4mm. Bugs me that they charge shipping for each seperate item so no combined shipping fee available.  Do you have the variable pin gauge as well ?
    • Yes, I understand that indeed.   Which is exactly what I am lacking, as I said. That's why the ring diameter matters to me.   That matches my anecdotal observation indeed. It could be the material or the modern backward curve that provides more power.   This is an interesting topic!  While these old oils were maybe thinner, their friction-reducing effect may still actually be lower than modern (even thicker oils), no? I man, some old, thin, organic oil may be less effective in reducing friction than a modern, thick HP1300 or so. What do you think?
×
×
  • Create New...