Jump to content

Thomas Mudge would turn in his grave


oldhippy

Recommended Posts

54 minutes ago, Lenj said:

All the time that I have been collecting clocks, this is one clock that I must say I do not like..I think they are ugly..

I like the proper antique Lantern clocks providing they haven’t been converted to anchor escapement, and not housed in some daft case.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally I'm impressed that he managed to make another clock about 200 years after he died. :D

I love the key handle, just like a cheap alarm clock and that the movement is French (If you believe the writing) I'm sure one of the greatest English clock makers wouldn't have a problem having his name applied to a French clock.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Lenj said:

Looking at that movement, is that not from a carriage clock?? I know I keep on about Couaillet Freres, but is that not their markings?? around the winder with the 4 dots..???

Those markings are easy to fake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's pretty typical the Victorians where obsessed with reproducing the past, the lantern clock style had a revival in the arts and crafts period of design and the french produced a large number of clocks in that style the smaller ones using carriage clock movements in both timepiece and striking clocks. There where many quality English and German made examples that used double fusee movements such as Winterhalder and Elliot clocks.

These pastiche type Lantern clocks began to appear around the 1880's upto the 1920's but some manufactures persisted with the design up until the 1970's with smiths producing the "Knell Gwynn" lantern style clock in both 8 day and electric version.

A great deal more of these clock exist than genuine Lantern clocks.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • in general this shouldn't be any change. but in general questions like this it be nice to know the specifics of the watch in other words how was it performing before it was cased up and what is it doing now.
    • just as a reminder this watch is a Swatch group product. This will bring up a problem like spare parts and technical information. that I found some links to some information on when I talk about your watch and some of the technical and basically your watch is equivalent to 2834-2 for which I'm attaching the technical sheets. But equivalent does not mean exactly the same you want to do a search on the group for C07 as we discussed this watch before including the technical differences how it's supposed to be regulated and basically because it's watch group there is no parts availability. https://calibercorner.com/eta-caliber-c07-xxx/   https://www.chrono24.com/magazine/eta-movements-from-the-2824-2-to-the-powermatic-80-p_80840/ https://www.watchuseek.com/threads/h-10-movement-details.4636991/ eta CT_2834-2_FDE_481857_15.pdf
    • people be honest.... Swatch is evil for the watchmakers and repairers, BUT not everything in watches from Switzerland is from the Swatch-Group. As far as i know, Selitta got sacked by Swatch as a Movement-Assembler for them and they started to produce Movements in their own Name with slight Modifications. As far as i know, they sell Parts to the Market for their Movements. In most cases, if a ETA-Movement fails, it is a valid Option to replace it with a Selitta Movement, which i consider the Solution for this Mess with the Swatch-Group...... I have no Connection to anybody at Selitta, but being a Swiss-Guy, i still like to have Swiss-Made Watches, but not from the Swatch-Group.   ok ? regards, Ernst
    • Just one more greedy act by Swatch. They started a number of years ago here in the US..cutting off supplies to watchmakers that could build complications that many Swatch houses couldn't even touch. Old school masters who had gone through some of the most prestigious houses in the world. Otto Frei has some statements on their page about it. I tell all my customers to avoid new Swiss watches like the plague,..unless they just want an older one in their collection that still has some parts out on the market, or they have really deep pockets and don't mind waiting months and paying through the nose to get it back. Plenty of others to choose from..IE Seiko,..or other non-swiss brands Even a number of Chinese brands are catching up with the Swiss,..and I think that in time, their actions will be their downfall
    • Yes. If that's not what you are experiencing...start looking for something rubbing. A 1st guess is that one of the hands is rubbing against the hole in the center of the dial. Especially if you now have lower amplitude in face up/ face down positions.
×
×
  • Create New...