Jump to content

New Project: Bracket Clock By Bryson


rodabod

Recommended Posts

It’s a big one! Didn’t realise until I collected it from the auction house. 

It will run, but definitely needs cleaning as it’s bone-dry. 

Escapement is either Deadbeat or semi-deadbeat as the pallets have individual impulse and “dead” faces. 

Silvered dial could do with a little cleaning, and I somehow need to find a new glass for it. The original glass is very thick and bevelled around the edge.

 

 

FAB3C5F8-9F5E-4962-ABBE-0232F8F0A6D9.png

3E0DE719-BC81-452B-AD75-F1BCF9D54EC9.png

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very nice clock like the case, you should leave the glass to an expert you will more than likely not find a replacement of the correct size and thickness better to have one made and fitted, it will probably cost a bit to do so. I wouldn't be tempted to clean the dial as is an old clock should look old, its probably lacquered so you would have to remove that then clean and re lacquer.

looks like you have quite a bit of rust to contended with as well.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thick glass is a sign of it being the original. 8 day English fusee movement, I expect it is an anchor escapement.  Looks a mahogany case with nice rich patina. I would leave the dial as it blends in well with the case. The hands style are spade decretive. It is a late movement because the back plate is plain, mid to late 1800’s. You should be able to find out more by the makers name on the dial. I wish I could get my hands on this. Do keep us up to date with this. I sure want to see how you get along. :woohoo-jumping-smiley-emoticon:    

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the comments. I actually own two Bryson bracket clocks. His name is mentioned in the book "Scottish Clockmakers":

BRYSON, ROBERT, F.R.S.E. 66 Princes Street, Edinburgh, 
1810-52. 

The escapement is definitely either deadbeat or half-dead.

I think the glass will be the only tricky bit. I'd like to get it cut from an older sheet of glass.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, rodabod said:

It’s a big one! Didn’t realise until I collected it from the auction house. 

It will run, but definitely needs cleaning as it’s bone-dry. 

Escapement is either Deadbeat or semi-deadbeat as the pallets have individual impulse and “dead” faces. 

Silvered dial could do with a little cleaning, and I somehow need to find a new glass for it. The original glass is very thick and bevelled around the edge.

 

 

FAB3C5F8-9F5E-4962-ABBE-0232F8F0A6D9.png

3E0DE719-BC81-452B-AD75-F1BCF9D54EC9.png

Beautiful clock..I believe Meadows and Passmore do thick glass, if you can't get the old glass..

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’ll check the inside and outside drop, and if it’s not excessive then I will just polish the faces of the pallets. 

My biggest problem is finding where to put the thing as it’s bloody massive and doesn’t fit on any of my mantelpieces. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Some more photos added below. I have re-bushed the bushing for the “watch” train fusee as the excess sideshake was causing the depthing with the centre wheel to give a slightly lumpy motion. I drifted the original hole in the opposite direction to the wear before broaching to correct the depthing. I’ve also filed the fusee pivot to make the sides parallel and will burnish it. 

011FA361-6A28-4757-88B4-54CABD3A685E.jpeg

C5AE6203-D134-4E5E-B1E3-F6602955C095.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Getting the correct depth for the fusee and center wheels are not easy, most depthing tools won’t tackle this, unless you make the runners. I had a setup of sorts using a lathe that sorted that. I would like to see the finished re-bushing of the fusee.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've got access to a depthing tool to check, but I was told not to rely too heavily on it. The bush that I've used is relatively modern brass, so the colour won't match. I need to get access to some thick CZ120 for re-bushing thick plates like these. This clock is not designed to have the movement visible (hence the rather plain design), so I'm focusing mainly on getting it running well, rather than looking pristine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 4 months later...

Sorry, not very regular updates. 
 

So, in order to use the unworn area of the pallets to reduce the escapement drop slightly (not that it was excessive), I’ve turned a small brass spacer which looks a little like a penny to move the pallets along by around 2mm or so. The pallet faces are also polished to a mirror finish. 
 

I do have one recent photo which is of the back plate. As it has significant scratches, I decided to re-grain the finish using 3M lapping film. This is prior to chalk brushing which gives a slightly softer finish. All of this has to be straight-grained from top to bottom, including the chalk brush action. There’s not a lot I can do about the previous hammer marks where someone has closed-down the going train fusee hole. But it’s not on display, so this is really a functional restoration. 
 

 

4ADED5B2-1909-4742-8FF5-18F1B1F8757D.jpeg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The rusty metal steel parts such as the bell mount which are made from steel rod have been rolled in a barrelling machine with some ball bearings. This is very effective at removing the softer rust without affecting the steel. The steel parts are grained to match the original, un-rusted parts. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The pallets should have been re-shod. Removing scratches or marks are all part of the clocks history. They should not have been removed. Leaving the hammer marks is the correct thing to do, again part of the history of the clock. Rust is easily removed by using emery cloth, ending with crocus paper which when done correctly leaves a high polish which it wold have had when new, the same goes for all steel parts. Avoid using power tools.

Please don’t take my comments the wrong way. When restoring a clock you have to consider what should be restored so you do not change the history of that clock you are working on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, rodabod said:

So, in order to use the unworn area of the pallets to reduce the escapement drop slightly (not that it was excessive), I’ve turned a small brass spacer which looks a little like a penny to move the pallets along by around 2mm or so. The pallet faces are also polished to a mirror finish.

Whether right or wrong I have to confess to doing this with a deadbeat escapement, I could not guarantee grinding and polishing the surface's to the exact angle so used a brass shim to move the faces of the pallets along to a good unworn area.:judge:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I won't change pallets while there is still 2/3rds of the faces which is unworn. I see the method of shimming them along as the best way to preserve the clock as the shim can be removed. I took advice from my clock tutor who is working on the clock's of the Houses Of Parliament this weekend, so he's knows his stuff. But I accept that people will always disagree , and that's fine.

I could leave the scratches on the main plate, but it's barely any material that I have to remove to tidy them up. I could take it to an extreme and also not remove material from the pivots by not polishing, but I think it's reasonable on a clock like this. I'm guessing it's maybe  a £1k clock and hardly a Tompion. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Regarding the glass Try bruce.davidson@btinternet,com  I have ad a few cut by him Ships clock flat, thick with beveled edges. I sent him the bezel and he did the rest and a good job. In your case send the bezel and the glass thats in it so he can match,,     worth an e-mail     cheers

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, watchweasol said:

Hi Regarding the glass Try bruce.davidson@btinternet,com  I have ad a few cut by him Ships clock flat, thick with beveled edges. I sent him the bezel and he did the rest and a good job. In your case send the bezel and the glass thats in it so he can match,,     worth an e-mail     cheers

Great. I’ll give them a shout. The glass does need to match. Looking forward to getting it complete and then I can sit it on top of my great grandfather’s bureau which is a similar colour.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thank you all for the replies!  Very informative! True enough, the Gamsol took some time to evaporate and does leave a residue. So not all naphtha are created equal!  Need to find alternatives then. i was able to try Hexane recommended by Alex and it seems great.  I wonder what the cons are?
    • Yeah, I saw that in the tech sheet but I don't see how it can be adequately cleaned with the friction pinion still in place. I've accidentally pulled the arbor right out of the wheel once when I used a presto tool to try and remove it. Mark shows how he does it with the Platax tool. Those are a little too pricey for me so I got one of these from Aliexpress and I just push down on the arbor with the end of my brass tweezers. That usually gets it most of the way out and then I just grab the wheel with one hand the and the friction pinion with the other and gently rotate them until it pops off. Probably not the best way but it's seemed to work for me so far.    
    • Thanks, Jon Sounds like a plan. Obviously I'll have the face on so do you think gripping with the holder will create any problems, but I will check in the morning to see how feasible it is but I assume it only needs to be lightly held. As for holding the movement instead of the holder won't be possible in this scenario as one hand will be puling on the stem while the other pushes the spring down. That was my initial concern is how the hell can I do this with only one pair of hands. All the other times I've had to remove the stem hasn't been a problem, apart from the force required to release the stem from the setting lever, but now I need to fit the face and hands its sent me into panic mode. If it had the screw type release things would be a lot simpler but that's life 😀   Another thing I will need to consider is once the dial and hands are fitted and the movement is sitting in the case I will need to turn it over to put the case screws in. I saw a vid on Wristwatch revival where he lightly fitted the crystal and bezel so he could turn it over, is this the only option or is there another method?      
    • Hi Jon, do You think that relation spring torque - amplitude is linear? I would rather guess that the amplitude should be proportional to the square of the torque. I had once idea to check it, but still haven't.
    • I did not. I thought about it, but I had cleaned it in my ultrasonic, and the tech sheet shows lubricating it in place already assembled, so I figured discretion was the better part of valor. Although since I have to depth the jewels anyway, maybe I pull the pinion off to rule it out 100% as part of the problem. Do you know if there's a safe way to do it? I don't want to use a puller because it would push down on the plane of the wheel, and that seems like a Bad Idea. I thought about using a roller table remover, but I don't think I have a hole stake pointy enough to push it down.
×
×
  • Create New...