Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The 400 series were 17 jewel movements made either by Laco or Hatori for Timex.  I'll wager $100 US that the seller can not show you a Timex document proving the 400 is a Marlin.  those sellers who are describing that as a Marlin are either dishonest or to lazy to research and verify what they are selling.  

 I'll post the information shortly - buy the watch if you want but know it is NOT A MARLIN.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pic 1. The model names of Timex watches from 1960 parts catalog.

Pic 2. 400 series were made from 1960 1961

Pic 3. My collection of all the known 400 models and two very rare display cases

Pic 4. The movements

Pic 5, 6, 7 . The 400 is dropped for the 21.  Timex developed the 21 jewels movement and thus was the end of the 400.

The cases are the same and the one 400 actually has a 21 movement inside.  It is common to find many 21's with a 400 case back as well.  Just Timex using up inventory.

 

 

DSC08274.JPG

DSC08275.JPG

DSC08276.JPG

DSC08277.JPG

DSC08278.JPG

DSC08279.JPG

DSC08280.JPG

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, oldhippy said:

You want to test one and see what happens. 

Prejudice aside, at one point in time the regulations have been changed to not allow anymore the word "waterproof", because that was deemed to be deceptive for the consumer. Since then, the term "water resistant" was introduced, with gradually more precise standards and definitions.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...
On 6/21/2018 at 12:22 AM, oldhippy said:

 

I don’t think any Timex will be waterproof. It might be water resistant.  

Have you seen the famous Timex ad in the 60s, where they strapped a Timex to the propeller of an outboard motor and ran it in a tank of water?

Yeah, It's just 12 inches of water. So it's not waterproof....🙃

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

I have a Timex 400 men’s watch with a 70-6 japan movement. How do you start searching for a stem/crown for a Japanese movement (or German movement for that matter) in a Timex branded watch?The movement is quite nice and should run great once cleaned and adjusted. Does this movement use a separate stem and screw-on crown ?

Thanks,

Keylessworks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh nice. I have a similar wedge style stump for my staking tool, so I'll give that a shot. Thanks!
    • Thank you all for the replies!  Very informative! True enough, the Gamsol took some time to evaporate and does leave a residue. So not all naphtha are created equal!  Need to find alternatives then. i was able to try Hexane recommended by Alex and it seems great.  I wonder what the cons are?
    • Yeah, I saw that in the tech sheet but I don't see how it can be adequately cleaned with the friction pinion still in place. I've accidentally pulled the arbor right out of the wheel once when I used a presto tool to try and remove it. Mark shows how he does it with the Platax tool. Those are a little too pricey for me so I got one of these from Aliexpress and I just push down on the arbor with the end of my brass tweezers. That usually gets it most of the way out and then I just grab the wheel with one hand the and the friction pinion with the other and gently rotate them until it pops off. Probably not the best way but it's seemed to work for me so far.    
    • Thanks, Jon Sounds like a plan. Obviously I'll have the face on so do you think gripping with the holder will create any problems, but I will check in the morning to see how feasible it is but I assume it only needs to be lightly held. As for holding the movement instead of the holder won't be possible in this scenario as one hand will be puling on the stem while the other pushes the spring down. That was my initial concern is how the hell can I do this with only one pair of hands. All the other times I've had to remove the stem hasn't been a problem, apart from the force required to release the stem from the setting lever, but now I need to fit the face and hands its sent me into panic mode. If it had the screw type release things would be a lot simpler but that's life 😀   Another thing I will need to consider is once the dial and hands are fitted and the movement is sitting in the case I will need to turn it over to put the case screws in. I saw a vid on Wristwatch revival where he lightly fitted the crystal and bezel so he could turn it over, is this the only option or is there another method?      
    • Hi Jon, do You think that relation spring torque - amplitude is linear? I would rather guess that the amplitude should be proportional to the square of the torque. I had once idea to check it, but still haven't.
×
×
  • Create New...