Jump to content

Movement Serviced 2836-2 Runs perfect on Final Test Machine, but


Recommended Posts

Normally it is a positional error. Did you test the watch in all positions. Some wear a watch crown up some wear dial down some remove the watch at night etc etc. I have found the biggest culprit is the balance end shake is to great. If so and if you have the correct equipment you can adjust the lower jewel setting with fractions of a mm making a huge difference. Side shake is another head ache altogether. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes CB, on the timegrapher, is all six positions, the movement is running and been regulated and is well within COSC, and its this which is confusing.  I will wear the watch for a few days once I resize the bracelet.  Its a head scratcher for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, SSTEEL said:

Checked everything, nothing amiss, only issues are when worn.  Its a very strange issue for sure.

You need to verify first in person. There is a say, no head bandage before breaking it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/16/2018 at 9:20 AM, SSTEEL said:

Yes CB, on the timegrapher, is all six positions, the movement is running and been regulated and is well within COSC, and its this which is confusing.  I will wear the watch for a few days once I resize the bracelet.  Its a head scratcher for sure.

Check the end shake on the balance, very important. It must be perceptible to ensure that the balance is totally free. A touch of a good quality lubricant on the jewel holes and end stones is essential with regard to the balance.   Check the guard pin as well for correct length and operation. the Timegrapher should show any discrepancies up though. This sounds a little bit of a poser !!. I am probably teaching you to suck eggs !!.  Is the amplitude constant?  oldhippy gave me a tip not to oil the pallet arbors on an Everite watch and this improved the Bal amplitude from 140-190 to a steady 220deg !. Check the clearance on the pallet arbors  to be sure the pallet is quite Free. It`s rotational moment is so little that oil is not neccessary and was causing drag in my case. Hope this helps, Mike.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, ecodec said:

This sounds a little bit of a poser !!. I am probably teaching you to suck eggs !!

Mike, indeed SSTEEL is a professional watch repairer, check his previous postings. The good advice you gave applies when the timegrapher data is unsatisfying, but here we're discussing a different, and still unproven issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are two common problems that can cause this phenomenon of poor timekeeping.  What does the customer use to compare the watch to?  Specifically how does the customer know the watch is fast or slow. Sometimes customers will look at a variety of time sources none of which are on time and or use time sources that are less accurate than the watch.

Then this is an automatic the problem with automatics are they need movement to stay wound up. Not all customers are active enough to keep their watch wound up. As people get older they're not necessarily as active as they once were or the lifestyle changes variety of reasons they keep automatic watches from getting enough movement to stay wound up.

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

There are two common problems that can cause this phenomenon of poor timekeeping.  What does the customer use to compare the watch to?  Specifically how does the customer know the watch is fast or slow. Sometimes customers will look at a variety of time sources none of which are on time and or use time sources that are less accurate than the watch.

Then this is an automatic the problem with automatics are they need movement to stay wound up. Not all customers are active enough to keep their watch wound up. As people get older they're not necessarily as active as they once were or the lifestyle changes variety of reasons they keep automatic watches from getting enough movement to stay wound up.

 

I agree to a certain extent but I am under the impression this is a large error. Watches run at different rates depending on their position but with a healthy watch the differences over 24hrs will be seconds not minutes. SSTEEL is going to have to wear the watch for a few days to see the true error.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, jdm said:

Mike, indeed SSTEEL is a professional watch repairer, check his previous postings. The good advice you gave applies when the timegrapher data is unsatisfying, but here we're discussing a different, and still unproven issue.

Indeed jdm. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will be wearing the watch over the next few days, so will report my findings.  I wear a Rolex Submariner as my daily watch, and it auto winds perfectly with my day to day activity working, and whatnot, so I will at least know if the issue is related to the owner not being active enough.  I have come across a few customers who work at a desk, and they are not active enough to auto wind their watch movements.  On more than one occasion, I have had to instruct the owner how to manually wind their watch movement, quite surprising, some customers were not even aware they could manually wind their watch. :blink:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

just a quick note to your last post SSTEEL, i have just serviced a job lot of watches for a family friend,one was her childhood watch, she's 48 and didn't know it was a manual/mechanical watch and i had to tell her how to wind it etc, couldn't believe I had to explain that point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello and welcome from Leeds. 
    • Unfortunately I'm not that lucky. I started on the train side and after I noticed the binding I pulled everything out except the driving wheel to rule everything else out. It still binds. I'm going to double check that the pinion is fully seated on the staff first, then if no joy I'll push the bridge jewel up a fraction of a mm. Fingers crossed!
    • Happy to have helped, great way to start the day with a win! 🥳
    • Thank you for the advise!! It worked. The setting screw was a lock/unlock to remove the rotor. 
    • I have that French tech sheet too, it is a little different than the English one (eg, it doesn't have the auto works diagram). BTW, it looks like you are looking up the case number in the 1979 ABC supplement. The 1974 ABC catalog does have the 3093 case. As you determined it takes the 1222-5 crystal.  When I serviced my President 'A' (which also takes that crystal), I was able to fit a 29.8 crystal from my DPA crystal assortment. Those are, in my opinion, a great deal. The assortment comes with 10 sizes each from 27.8mm to 32.4mm in 0.2 increments. I pretty much use them for any non-armored crystal that takes a high dome crystal. I think they no longer make them but Cousins has still has some in stock but when I bought them they were around $40 for the set and now they are around $100. Still, at 40 cents a crystal it's still a good deal. For the large driving wheel, I remember I once assembled the keyless/motion works first and when I placed the large driving wheel it was interfering with the setting wheel on the dial side as the teeth were not fully meshing and it wouldn't fully seat. If that isn't the issue I got nothing and am looking forward to see how you solve it 🙂
×
×
  • Create New...