Jump to content

Movement Serviced 2836-2 Runs perfect on Final Test Machine, but


Recommended Posts

Normally it is a positional error. Did you test the watch in all positions. Some wear a watch crown up some wear dial down some remove the watch at night etc etc. I have found the biggest culprit is the balance end shake is to great. If so and if you have the correct equipment you can adjust the lower jewel setting with fractions of a mm making a huge difference. Side shake is another head ache altogether. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes CB, on the timegrapher, is all six positions, the movement is running and been regulated and is well within COSC, and its this which is confusing.  I will wear the watch for a few days once I resize the bracelet.  Its a head scratcher for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, SSTEEL said:

Checked everything, nothing amiss, only issues are when worn.  Its a very strange issue for sure.

You need to verify first in person. There is a say, no head bandage before breaking it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/16/2018 at 9:20 AM, SSTEEL said:

Yes CB, on the timegrapher, is all six positions, the movement is running and been regulated and is well within COSC, and its this which is confusing.  I will wear the watch for a few days once I resize the bracelet.  Its a head scratcher for sure.

Check the end shake on the balance, very important. It must be perceptible to ensure that the balance is totally free. A touch of a good quality lubricant on the jewel holes and end stones is essential with regard to the balance.   Check the guard pin as well for correct length and operation. the Timegrapher should show any discrepancies up though. This sounds a little bit of a poser !!. I am probably teaching you to suck eggs !!.  Is the amplitude constant?  oldhippy gave me a tip not to oil the pallet arbors on an Everite watch and this improved the Bal amplitude from 140-190 to a steady 220deg !. Check the clearance on the pallet arbors  to be sure the pallet is quite Free. It`s rotational moment is so little that oil is not neccessary and was causing drag in my case. Hope this helps, Mike.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, ecodec said:

This sounds a little bit of a poser !!. I am probably teaching you to suck eggs !!

Mike, indeed SSTEEL is a professional watch repairer, check his previous postings. The good advice you gave applies when the timegrapher data is unsatisfying, but here we're discussing a different, and still unproven issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are two common problems that can cause this phenomenon of poor timekeeping.  What does the customer use to compare the watch to?  Specifically how does the customer know the watch is fast or slow. Sometimes customers will look at a variety of time sources none of which are on time and or use time sources that are less accurate than the watch.

Then this is an automatic the problem with automatics are they need movement to stay wound up. Not all customers are active enough to keep their watch wound up. As people get older they're not necessarily as active as they once were or the lifestyle changes variety of reasons they keep automatic watches from getting enough movement to stay wound up.

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

There are two common problems that can cause this phenomenon of poor timekeeping.  What does the customer use to compare the watch to?  Specifically how does the customer know the watch is fast or slow. Sometimes customers will look at a variety of time sources none of which are on time and or use time sources that are less accurate than the watch.

Then this is an automatic the problem with automatics are they need movement to stay wound up. Not all customers are active enough to keep their watch wound up. As people get older they're not necessarily as active as they once were or the lifestyle changes variety of reasons they keep automatic watches from getting enough movement to stay wound up.

 

I agree to a certain extent but I am under the impression this is a large error. Watches run at different rates depending on their position but with a healthy watch the differences over 24hrs will be seconds not minutes. SSTEEL is going to have to wear the watch for a few days to see the true error.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, jdm said:

Mike, indeed SSTEEL is a professional watch repairer, check his previous postings. The good advice you gave applies when the timegrapher data is unsatisfying, but here we're discussing a different, and still unproven issue.

Indeed jdm. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will be wearing the watch over the next few days, so will report my findings.  I wear a Rolex Submariner as my daily watch, and it auto winds perfectly with my day to day activity working, and whatnot, so I will at least know if the issue is related to the owner not being active enough.  I have come across a few customers who work at a desk, and they are not active enough to auto wind their watch movements.  On more than one occasion, I have had to instruct the owner how to manually wind their watch movement, quite surprising, some customers were not even aware they could manually wind their watch. :blink:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

just a quick note to your last post SSTEEL, i have just serviced a job lot of watches for a family friend,one was her childhood watch, she's 48 and didn't know it was a manual/mechanical watch and i had to tell her how to wind it etc, couldn't believe I had to explain that point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hopefully if the issue is running costs, Mark would let us know and suggest ways of raising finance. If it's the other issue, which we are skirting around, sites can be passed onto others.   PS because I know you're all interested, I  had a bacon and mushroom sandwich for breakfast.  Hehe. 
    • Thank you for your introduction and welcome to this friendly forum. We all look forward to your contributions and continued involvement. 
    • Hello Nosh and welcome to the forum.   Enjoy
    • Hi guys, the question is what is a forum, a place for discussion and passing on information, idle chat and a bit of fun and I for one are the richer for it. When in Hospital last year with the Covid being force fed oxygen and feeling total sh1t and close to the pearly gates a daily look on the forum to see what was going down helped to keep me focused on the job in hand took my mind off the problem for a short while but it was a lifeline for sure. We chat to friends for that is what they become around the world read their posts help where we can post information where we can.  I like @Neverenoughwatches some times think of members past and wonder if they are still at the watches or given up, some drop in for advise and drop out again never to be heard of again. The forum reminds me of Yorkshire hospitality, The door is always open and the kettle on the stove. Long may it continue.   My two bobs worth.
    • Thanks all.   Movement is a Helvetia 800C. Don't know any history e.g. if the broken mainspring is original. Watch was bought recently as non-working. Really interesting piece that Jon, thanks. I'd only been thinking of length relating to power reserve. I don't have a mainspring winder (yet) so I'd like to avoid winding the spring into the barrel by hand. The old spring measures at 1.60 x .11 x ~290. Sorry, can't be exact on the length. The piece I still have is 275, but the second piece escaped during measurement. Best measurement I had for it was ~13. The micrometer does zero accurately so I'm pretty confident of the .11 Also, I'm getting the barrel ID at 9.5 on a vernier. I'm now wondering about going with a .11 spring? Given all of the above, maybe 1.60 x .11 x 300 x 9? Any thoughts? Cheers.
×
×
  • Create New...