Jump to content

Renata vs Energizer Batteries which is better?


Recommended Posts

I use nothing but Renata as I've yet to have one leak and ruin a watch.  Not that that means anything.  It just has not happened to me yet.  I have had however, several watches with Energizers and others, that have leaked in the watch.  It would be nice if some of you who are in the watch repair field could weigh in on this.    Personally, it's totally unacceptable for a watch battery to leak.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Khronos said:

 Personally, it's totally unacceptable for a watch battery to leak.

When the charge is exhausted, chemicals become acid and may corrode case and leak. I have never seen any battery manufactured promise in writing a protection for that.

Solution, do not leave discharged batteries in watches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, JDM, I totally agree, but the reality is people leave dead batteries in watches and some battery manufactures really do things on the cheap that make the problem way worse.  But yes, it's going to be a continuous problem.  The down side of batteries.  On a side note, I've had problems with AA and AAA batteries but since switching to Lithium the problem is gone.  The point is, I suspect the problem could be solved and yes, I'd be happy to pay twice or three times the price for such a quality battery. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Khronos said:

The point is, I suspect the problem could be solved and yes, I'd be happy to pay twice or three times the price for such a quality battery. 

For the most common sizes, Renata now offers a Premium type. Among the features they list:

State of the art leak proofness thanks to a new sophisticated sealing process

So I have to stand corrected about makers not making claims in this area.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To  put my 5 eggs in,  I use Renata, Sony and Maxell and have never had a problem. I recently had a Ladies Rotary that the battery had leaked in. A local franchised shoe repairer had forced the battery out and  lost the insulator,  then told the owner that it was BER !. I gave it the treatment and it left me OK. I do not know what the original battery make was. (All made in China I believe) He was probably OK with boots and shoes !!!.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...
On 6/2/2018 at 12:53 PM, Khronos said:

I use nothing but Renata as I've yet to have one leak and ruin a watch.  Not that that means anything.  It just has not happened to me yet.  I have had however, several watches with Energizers and others, that have leaked in the watch.  It would be nice if some of you who are in the watch repair field could weigh in on this.    Personally, it's totally unacceptable for a watch battery to leak.

they both leak, the problem is to leave the dead battery inside to long, or if the watch is not sealed and moisture manages to get inside the watch that would also cause the battery to leak

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've seen many brands of batteries leak. But the question is whether they were original or fakes?

I suspect that some repairers are sourcing for the best bargains online. If you take a look at AliExpress and Amazon, there are batteries that are ridiculously cheap. Once it is out of its packaging, it would be really difficult to tell its authenticity. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Searching on Google according to them Renata are the best. They are also the battery of choice fitted by premier Swiss watch houses including Tag HEUER, Breitling, Chopard and even Rolex for their quartz collections.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Renata are part of the Swatch Group so I assume would have a vested interest in quality required for watches.  I always use Renata and have had no problems with leakage.  Leakage problems encountered usually due to low quality batteries or not silver oxide type fitted. Similarly I would expect Seizaiken (Seiko) batteries would be ok.

Edited by canthus
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

It depends, if you ask Americans they will tell you renata because Americans hate anything made in the USA, if you ask a outside the US people will tell you energizer because they like American stuff, in my own experience both batteries are good, same quality same battery, no difference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Having only just started watch repairing I don't have a long history to refer back to, but I have looked a quite a few Quartz watches for friends and neighbours that have been left in draws for in some cases many years, so all the batteries were long dead.  Not one of them showed any sign of leaking, and all sprang into life with a new battery.

I did have some selection packs of Kodak branded watch batteries bought before I knew better, and some of those leaked whilst still in their packaging, so these were never used in a watch, but were used in other gadgets I had that needed small batteries.

I tend to buy Maxell for watches now.

On a side note in the electronic repair world Duracell and Energizer AA batteries are well know for their fondness to leak so don't risk anything from them these days.

Paul

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think if you want to play Billy big b.ollocks then you have to have something up your sleeve, anyone that knows how to fight, plays dirty. Lets face it a lot of folk that voted for Brexit just rolled uk their sleeves to say up yours EU hoping for good changes. We have idiots for leaders and probably none of them clever enough to clean the shitty stick they were given. I didnt vote, what will be will be.
    • I voted leave too, my reasoning was the the EU is undemocratic, no elected officials. I don't regret it but I  am sad that both sides acted like petulant toddlers.  Shameful.  I'm not on other forums but if I was and left this site, would you shun me? Of course not, we aren't petulant toddlers.  
    • This is a type of tool that may be suitable to remove the bezel - though note that I'm pretty sure the watch should be face down - not face up, as in some of the photos of these tools on amazon & ebay! If you try one one of those, put the movement screws back in first to avoid accidents. https://www.amazon.co.uk/Removal-Professional-Remover-Watchmaker-Diameter/dp/B09XCH4QVN?source=ps-sl-shoppingads-lpcontext&ref_=fplfs&smid=A296NCMMFVXSDN&th=1  
    • Hi, I’m constantly asking my wife to help me with removing the stem in order to complete casing. To expand, this is not a challenge for me when the setting lever is secured by a screw (older calibers). However when the setting lever is attached to a spring loaded setting lever axel, like on more modern calibers, I simply don’t see how to apply enough pressure on the button to get the stem out short of putting the movement face down with the dial and hands attached, which I’m loath to do in order to avoid damaging the dial/hands? what technique should I be using? thanks  
    • Many thanks for your advice (being borne in mind at present) & offer Dell. When I was given the clock the plastic anchor was loose on the arbour (it had split at the 'hole') &, after repairing this, I have been trying to determine whether the spindle (pin) should be perpendicular when the pallet is sitting on a flat surface; or whether, when installed, its L-R extremes (or alternatively its tick & tock points) should lie at equal angles from the vertical when moved with spring absent. I can get the clock to run but in every such configuration the top block has to be turned anti-clockwise (from above) by quite a bit in order to be 'in beat' & it always runs fast (despite the pendulum being set to as slow as possible). This makes me wonder if there is any particular feature of/fault in a torsion spring clock which determines which turn direction (if any) is necessary to get it 'in beat'; & whether there would be a different set of settings that would get it running nearer to time at somewhere around the mid timing/inertia position which would then allow tweaking of the fast/slow setting.
×
×
  • Create New...