Jump to content

Shim under the balance cock


Recommended Posts

This is common in Russian watches and should be put back in place otherwise the balance will not have enough end shake and you will encounter poor balance amplitude, they are an absolute pain to put back sometimes they are hard to keep in place.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, p2n said:

Do you think this was put there during manufacture or repair?

Should I put it back in or try it without it first?

shim.JPG.51292181eb13d7eb383324384b5d331f.JPG

 

P5140026.thumb.JPG.61e95e127f5a4bca0649092688704dd7.JPG

Was this under the balance cock? If it was I have seen something like this before on an american watch . I believe it was to keep the balance stem up just a bit. I know the watch woulden't work without it. I doubt it was factory installed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can wholeheartedly recommend the Vostok 2409/2414 movements and the Poljot 2614.2H movement to any beginning watch repairer.

Oh yes, a shim is sometimes used, but it works and I consider that a lot more serious than making a "bump" in the main plate as the Chinese do.
 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, clockboy said:

I have serviced a few Sekonda watches and found them OK to service with good results.  I have had no experience with Poljot. 

The SEKONDA uses a Poljot 2614.2H.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Getting back to the original question I have found shims in a few vintage watches and in the occasional pocket watch. I think some Russian watches have them fitted as standard. For others it is where a new staff has been fitted and it is a bit tight. The correct method is to hone the staff to the correct length but some revert to the shim method to save time

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On ‎5‎/‎25‎/‎2018 at 9:18 AM, TimFitz said:

Was this under the balance cock? If it was I have seen something like this before on an american watch . I believe it was to keep the balance stem up just a bit. I know the watch woulden't work without it. I doubt it was factory installed

   do the Russ factory or any country put  a shim under the bridge?  vin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can assure you these shims are indeed part of the movement. Back in the 70’s and 80’s all the Russian movements of that period had them.  They were machined to size and shape to fit under the balance cock.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...
On 5/25/2018 at 5:55 PM, p2n said:

Do you think this was put there during manufacture or repair?

Should I put it back in or try it without it first?

shim.JPG.51292181eb13d7eb383324384b5d331f.JPG

 

P5140026.thumb.JPG.61e95e127f5a4bca0649092688704dd7.JPG

Yes I have the same part only my problem is that my balance is loose and broken from the cock. I have three new balances but can't get it attached. Help

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Put the movement in a movement holder and it will be supported as you push down on the setting lever post to release the winding stem. Make sure the post is over the shoulder of the movement holder so what you are pressing down on is supported. As a general rule, hold the movement and not the movement holder. Replace the hands when the movement isn't in the case and support the centre jewel (if it has one) on a hard surface or staking block when replacing the hands to stop the jewel accidentally moving or even coming out. A dedicated movement holder with a central jewel support is even better, but pricey
    • It might help us if we knew which watch like model number.
    • Hi, guys I have a bit of a predicament and hopefully, somebody can advise. I'm working on a Roamer MST 521 where the movement is extracted from the crystal side. I'm now at the final hurdle where I need to replace the movement back into its case but I'm not sure of the correct procedure. I still need to fit the hands but that's where the problem lies. If I insert the winding stem to test the hands for correct alignment I will need to turn the movement over to release the stem again it's the spring-loaded type and needs a small bit of force to push down but with the hands fitted, I don't think I can do this on a cushion without causing some damage to the hands and that's the last thing I want to do, this watch has already been a love-hate relationship and I'm so close to boxing this one off which I'm counting as my first major project.  The other option is to case the movement then fit the hands and hope everything is okay. I've already broken the original winding stem but managed to find a replacement, the last one in stock, so I'm a bit reluctant to keep removing it. Any suggestions would be appreciated. 
    • I would go for the dearer spring. You won't need to remove the spring from the carrier ring and then use a mainspring winder to get it into the barrel, for a start. Also that spring is closer to the needed dimensions, especially the length. The length plays a part in the mainsprings strength. If you double the length you will half the force (strength) of the spring and vice-versa. A spring with 20 mm less length would be about 7% shorter, so technically would be 7% more strength, but I find halving this number is closer to real-world findings, so the spring would be about 3 to 4% more strength/force. On a mainspring that ideally kicks out 300 degrees of amplitude, a 3% increase in amplitude would be 309 degrees. Increasing or decreasing the length of the mainspring will affect the power reserve to a greater or lesser degree. It depends how much shorter or longer it is. I've attached a lesson regarding mainsprings, focussing on the size and strength of the spring within the barrel, you might find helpful. Unfortunately it is a PDF converted from a PowerPoint presentation, but only a slide was lost that was originally a video of fitting a mainspring   Lesson 5 The mainspring.pdf
×
×
  • Create New...