Jump to content

Questions regarding crystal gasket sizing and compression

SQ19HRLGY
 Share

Recommended Posts

SQ19HRLGY New Member

SQ19HRLGY

Posted
Posted

I've read on another thread to not account for compression when changing crystals + gaskets and to simply follow the rule of

Case Inner Diameter = Gasket Outer Diameter and Gasket Inner Diameter = Crystal Outer Diameter

However the measurements of the original factory parts on my watch suggested otherwise

Case ID is 30.5mm
Crystal OD was 29.5mm
Gasket ID is 29.5mm
OD of crystal + gasket is 30.6mm (so I've noticed that .1 mm can be compressed)

Now I found a gasket with a ID of 29.35 and OD of 30.5.

Will the .15 difference compress for a snug fit or does compression only work for differences on the outer diameter (will my crystal break)?

Also, will a gasket with a matching ID of 29.5 and OD of 30.5 work better?

Many thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites
oldhippy Distinguished Member

oldhippy

Posted
Posted

I think you are being a little fussy, why because when it comes to gaskets you can buy assortments from suppliers, from that selection you can find one that fits. If the back doesn’t screw down properly you know you have the wrong size or shape. With crystals if it is  a high dome and you use one of these (see photo) you can squeeze it to fit, in other words if it is a size too big it will fit providing it doesn’t look stupid in height. Tension ring glasses are different if you do not have the right size they will not fit and you need the proper tool to enable them to fit correctly. The high grade watches you should be able to order the correct gasket and glass. When it comes to glasses there are to many types to mention.

 

original-bergeon-watch-crystal-lift-glass-remover-t50-1224-p.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SQ19HRLGY New Member

SQ19HRLGY

Posted
  • Author
Posted

So... can I use the 29.35 gasket without worrying about my crystal breaking? Or am i better off with the 29.5?

Apologies to you and other veterans if I come across as too fussy, but I'm a new hobbyist who is trying learn the general rule of thumb for sizing gaskets. I want to understand what I can get away with in terms of compression so I don't break expensive sapphire crystals on a regular basis. As mentioned before, even after reading multiple threads and sites, I am a bit confused.

I have done enough research to be well aware of the many crystals, tools, and assortments out there, and to know that with high grade watches it is much easier to order correct sizes. However that wasn't the question. This is not a high grade watch and the sizing is rather awkward. I've already found 2 gaskets that should work and I am simply asking which of the two will logically work better and if either will break my crystal.

Hoping you can shed some light for this newbie!

Many thanks again

 


 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
dadistic Distinguished Member

dadistic

Posted
Posted

It might help if you tell us what watch you are working with, there are many different methods of fixing a crystal, I think @oldhippy may be thinking of the wrong type. 

So, if you trying to mount a sapphire crystal into an l-gasket on a Seiko watch, then you are best off using the original l-gasket if it is serviceable.  If not, then purchasing the OEM replacement is the way to go I think. The replacement crystal should be the exact same diameter as the original.

There are other people here with more experience with this type of crystal than me, hopefully they will chime in. Ultimately, it is  experience that will determine whether or not you will break crystals. I just cracked one yesterday, it was an acrylic that needed finishing to fit properly, and I got a bit too enthusiastic :-) I've been doing this for a while, too.

Good Luck

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
oldhippy Distinguished Member

oldhippy

Posted
Posted

The smaller of the two gaskets should be fine. It is better to stretch it a little, then to have one bunched up when screwing the back on. Even if the back Is a press on a bigger gasket can become trapped.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SQ19HRLGY New Member

SQ19HRLGY

Posted
  • Author
Posted
On 5/21/2018 at 11:35 AM, dadistic said:

It might help if you tell us what watch you are working with, there are many different methods of fixing a crystal, I think @oldhippy may be thinking of the wrong type. 

So, if you trying to mount a sapphire crystal into an l-gasket on a Seiko watch, then you are best off using the original l-gasket if it is serviceable.  If not, then purchasing the OEM replacement is the way to go I think. The replacement crystal should be the exact same diameter as the original.

There are other people here with more experience with this type of crystal than me, hopefully they will chime in. Ultimately, it is  experience that will determine whether or not you will break crystals. I just cracked one yesterday, it was an acrylic that needed finishing to fit properly, and I got a bit too enthusiastic :-) I've been doing this for a while, too.

Good Luck

Ah I should've mentioned that its a wenger field watch that held a flat mineral crystal with straight sides. I did mention though that I just bought a domed sapphire of the same diameter to replace the flat mineral so I'm not sure why oldhippy keeps talking about casebacks.. :huh:

All I wanted to know is how much do crystal gaskets compress, if at all? And do I need to account for this (contrary to what another thread quoting esslinger said)? I wanted to know before I spend money on gaskets and crack an expensive crystal, but as you mentioned it seems to be the consensus that only experience will determine this :biggrin:

Related to sizing - the sidewalls of the seating for the crystal are 1.1mm high. Would I be able to use a gasket that is .9mm high as long as the width/diameters fit? Or are there problems that im not aware that i'll run into?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • RichardHarris123
      Without Our Forum

      By RichardHarris123 · Posted

      In the meantime whilst awaiting a better plan, please drop me a quick hello on my email. 
    • Neverenoughwatches
      Without Our Forum

      By Neverenoughwatches · Posted

      I looked at it like this, I've built a lot of stuff in my time, building structures and furniture,those are my creations and they will still be here way way after I'm gone. Traditional watchmakers felt the need to pass their knowledge on, ideas that they created . I assume with them as it is with me, leaving their mark on the earth, a way of being remembered. This creation of Mark's has brought thousands of people together to pass their knowledge around,  ideas that will continue to be used for lifetimes. Ideas that should continue to be procured. If for whatever reason the forum ceased to exist, not quite like Ranfft's, that didn't disappear but much less usable. Then that is sad, such a massive loss of communication between good people and a wealth of knowledge lost. There should be something in place for when that happens which could be next week, next year or in 10 years. Might not be a topical subject for a lot of folk or boardering on controversy, i did say i talk about stuff other people dont. But if you dont talk about it and something happens then you've lost it and you ain't gonna fix it .
    • Waggy
      Without Our Forum

      By Waggy · Posted

      I've remained silent on this thread, and at the risk of upsetting everyone, the thing that worries me the most the the apparent absence of Mark. The moderators do a great job and the members also pitch in, and the site seems to run itself, but it is a concern for the future of this forum when the owner is absent for all intents and purposes. Like many of the comments above I would hate to log in one day and things be closed down as I rely on this site for ideas and knowledge and also cheer me up. maybe the Moderators could reach out to him, assuming he does not read this thread, and express our concerns and let us know the plans going forward? some kind of WRT ark
    • Neverenoughwatches
      Without Our Forum

      By Neverenoughwatches · Posted

      That was the exact reason for me starting this thread watchie. Still we haven't worked out how the regulars are going to hook up if it goes tits up. I honestly think something should be arranged to stay in contact, we all help each other so much. 
    • Neverenoughwatches
      Setting lever spring

      By Neverenoughwatches · Posted

      Yeah ive watched that a few times before,  i couldnt find my old school dividers to scribe it up 😅 Yep thats the guy i bought a roll from . Thanks Nicklesilver that answers that perfectly and more or less what i thought an experiment over time would prove . The jumper arm is quite thick along its length, i left it that way intentionally, i thought the original was probably very thin, i didnt see that it was already missing. Setting isn't particularly stiff as such just positive, i still need to take it out and polish where it mates with the stem release. 
×
×
  • Create New...